This experimental study investigates the impact of short-messaging service (SMS)—text messaging—on social connectedness and group attitude in student technical communication projects. It also investigates message types and communication medium preferences. Using a between-subjects design, the experiment compares two student groups: SMS only and non-SMS. The results indicated several statistically significant differences. Compared to students in the non-SMS group, students in the SMS-only group (a) communicated more, (b) felt more connected, and (c) sent more questions, answers, and nonproject-related messages. These results provide empirical evidence for using SMS in team contexts.
AustinJ. L. (1955). How to do things with words (2nded). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BauerS.OkonE.MeermannR.KordyH. (2012). Technology-enhanced maintenance of treatment gains in eating disorders: Efficacy of an intervention delivered via text messaging. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Advance online publication. 80, 700–706
3.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
4.
CoyneS.StockdaleL.BusbyD.IversonB.GrantD. (2011). “I luv u :)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60, 150–162.
5.
DobkinL.KentC.KlausnerJ.McCrightJ.KohnR.LevineD. (2007). Is text messaging key to improving adolescent sexual health?Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, S14.
EkanjumeB. (2009). A sociolinguistic survey of the use of SMS-text messages among NUL academic staff. Nawa: Journal of Language & Communication, 3, 14–32.
8.
EvansN.JarvisP. (1986). The group attitude scale: A measure of attraction to group. Small Group Research, 17, 203–216.
9.
FaulknerX.CulwinF. (2005). When fingers do the talking: A study of text messaging. Interacting With Computers, 17, 167–185.
10.
FoxK. (2001). Evolution, alienation and gossip: The role of mobile telecommunications in the 21st century. Oxford, England: Social Issues Research Centre.
11.
GalushkinI. (2003). Text messages: A potentially rich medium in distributed organizations. Prism, 1, 1–13.
12.
GeraghtyM.GlynnF.AminM.KinsellaJ. (2007). Patient mobile telephone “text” reminder: A novel way to reduce non-attendance at the ENT out-patient clinic. Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1, 1–3.
13.
GoffmanE. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth, England: Allen Lane.
14.
GoldJ.LimM.HockingJ.KeoghL.SpelmanT.HellardM. (2010). Determining the impact of text messaging for sexual health promotion to young people. Sex Transmitted Diseases, 38, 247–252.
15.
GonzalesA. (2009). Validation of an inventory of social connectedness. In VoideS. (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 375–376). Sanibel Island, FL: Association for Computing Machinery.
16.
GrinterB.EldridgeM. (2003). Wan2tlk? Everyday text messaging. In CocktonG.KorhonenP. (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI2003 (pp. 441–448). New York, NY: ACM Press.
17.
HashimotoY. (2002). The spread of cellular phones and their influence on young people in Japan. In KimS. D. (Ed.), The social and cultural impact/meaning of mobile communication (pp. 102–112). Chunchon, Korea: School of Communication, Hallym University.
18.
HaugS.MeyerC.DymalskiA.LippkeS.UlrichH. (2012). Efficacy of a text messaging (SMS) based smoking cessation intervention for adolescents and young adults: Study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 12, 1–7.
19.
HjorthL. (2005). Locating mobility: Practices of co-presence and the persistence of the postal metaphor in SMS/MMS mobile phone customization in Melbourne. Fibreculture Journal, 6Retrieved fromhttp://journal.fibreculture.org/issue6.
20.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21.
HorstmanshofL.PowerM. (2005). Mobile phones, SMS, and relationships: Issues of access, control and privacy. Australian Journal of Communication, 32, 33–52.
22.
HowardJ.FriendD.ParkerT.StrekerG. (2010). Use of SMS to support parents who experience violence from their adolescents. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 16, 187–191.
23.
IjsselsteijnW.Van BarenJ.Van LanenF. (2003). Staying in touch: Social presence and connectedness through synchronous and asynchronous communication media. In JackoJ.StephanidisC. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Theory and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 924–928). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
IshiiK. (2005). The human side of the digital divide: Media experience as the border of communication satisfaction with email. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 35, 385–402.
25.
ItoM. (2003). Mobile phones, Japanese youth, and the replacement of social contact. In LingR.PedersenP. (Eds.), Front stage/back stage: Mobile communication and the renegotiation of the public sphere (pp. 331–366). Grimstad, Norway: Agder University College.
26.
ItoM.OkabeD. (2005). Intimate connections: Contextualizing Japanese youth and mobile messaging. In HarperR.PalenL.TaylorA. (Eds.), The inside text (pp. 127–145). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
KasesniemiE. L.RautiainenP. (2002). Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland. In KatzJ.AakhusM. (Eds.), Perpetual contact (pp. 170–192). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KatzJ.AakhusM. (Eds.). (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30.
KimH.KimG. J.ParkH. W.RiceR. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1183–1207.
31.
LamC. (2011). Linguistic politeness in student-team emails: Its impact on trust between leaders and members. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54, 360–375.
32.
LamC.MackiewczJ. (2007). A case study of coherence in workplace instant messages. In Proceedings of the International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC) 2007(pp. 1–6). Seattle, WA: IEEE.
33.
LaursenD. (2005). Please reply! The replying norm in adolescent SMS communication. In HarperR.PalenL.TaylorA. (Eds.), The inside text (pp. 53–73). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
34.
LeeZ.LeeY. (2009). Emailing the boss: Cultural implications of media choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52, 61–74.
35.
LinA.TongA. H. M. (2007). Text-messaging cultures of college girls in Hong Kong: SMS as resources for achieving intimacy and gift-exchange with multiple functions. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 21, 303–315.
36.
LingR. (2000). Direct and mediated interaction in the maintenance of social relationships. In SloaneA.RijnF. V. (Eds.), Kluwer home informatics and telematics: Information, technology and society (pp. 61–86). Boston, MA: ACM.
37.
LingR. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Kaufmann.
38.
LingR.YttriB. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In KatzE.AakhusM. (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139–169). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MackiewiczJ.LamC. (2009). Coherence in workplace instant messages. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 39, 417–431.
PendharkarP. C.YoungK. (2004). The development of a construct for measuring an individual's perceptions of email as a medium for electronic communication in organizations. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 130–143.
42.
PettigrewJ. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 45, 697–716.
PijnenborgG. H. M.WithaarF. K.BrouwerW. H.TimmermanM. E.Van den BoschR. J.EvansJ. J. (2012). The efficacy of SMS text messages to compensate for the effects of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 259–274.
45.
PlantS. (2001). On the mobile: The effects of mobile telephones on social and individual life. Motorola.
46.
ReidD. J.ReidF. J. M. (2005). Textmates and text circles: Insights into the social ecology of SMS text messaging. In HamillL.LasenA. (Eds.), Mobile world: Past, present and future (pp. 105–118). London, England: Springer-Verlag.
47.
ReidD. J.ReidF. J. M. (2010). The expressive and conversational affordances of mobile messaging. Behaviour and Information Technology, 29, 3–22.
48.
RettieR. (2003). A comparison of four new communication technologies. In JackoJ. A.StephanidisC. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Theory and practice (Part 1; pp. 686–690). Florence, KY: CRC Press.
49.
RodgersA.CorbettT.BramleyD.RiddellT.WillsM.LinR.-B.JonesM. (2005). Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging. Tobacco Control, 14, 255–261.
50.
SearleJ. (1976). The classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–24.
VolkemaR. J.FleckD.HofmeisterA. (2011). Getting off on the right foot: The effects of initial email messages on negotiation process and outcome. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54, 299–313.
53.
WallaceC.MundellD. (2003). Crafting a cyber assignment: The first cut. Business Communication Quarterly, 66, 102–106.
