This article presents a rhetorical analysis of a Mexican woman's oral narrative performance using a discourse studies and interactional sociolinguistics framework. The results of the analysis suggest that the discursive practice of the oral narrative and that of academic discourse share certain rhetorical features. These features are (a) the fashioning of an authoritative voice, (b) the presentation of evidence for support of a claim, (c) the allusion to authorities for support of claims, and (d) the reaching of a general statement concerning the significance of the account. Given the parallels drawn out between this particular nonmainstream oral performance and the discourse of the academy, the assumptions concerning the link between form of expression and cognition must be reassessed to better understand the nature of constrative rhetorics, especially as this affects students of nonmainstream linguistic backgrounds in mainstream writing classrooms.
Ball, A. (1996). Expository writing patterns of African American students. English Journal, 85(1), 27-36.
2.
Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal art as performance. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
3.
Bizzell, P. (1986). What happens when basic writers come to college ? College Composition and Communication, 37(3), 294-301.
4.
Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness . Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5.
Bizzell, P., & Herzberg, B. (2001). The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical times to the present. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's Press.
6.
Briggs, C.L. (1988). Competence in performance: The creativity of tradition in Mexicano verbal art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
Cayer, R.L., & Sacks, R.K. (1979). Oral and written discourse of basic writers: Similarities and differences. Research in the Teaching of English, 13(2), 121-128.
8.
Cintron, R. (1997). Angels' town: Chero ways, gang life, and rhetorics of the everyday. Boston: Beacon .
9.
Corbett, E.P.J., & Connors, R.J. (1999). Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Cran, W. (Producer & Director). (2005). Do you speak American ? Princeton, NJ: Films for the Humanities & Sciences.
11.
Domínguez Barajas, E. (2002). Reconciling cognitive universals and cultural particulars: A Mexican social network's use of proverbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago.
12.
Domínguez Barajas, E. (2005). Sociocognitive aspects of proverb use in a Mexican transnational social network. In M. Farr (Ed.), Latino language and literacy in ethnolinguistic Chicago (pp. 67-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Farr, M. (1993). Essayist literacy and other verbal performances . Written Communication, 10(1), 4-38.
14.
Farrell, T.J. (1983). IQ and standard English. College Composition and Communication, 34(4), 470-484.
15.
Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter memory, practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
Gee, J.P. (1988). Discourse systems and aspirin bottles: On literacy . Journal of Education, 70(1), 27-40.
17.
Gilbert, J.R. (1987). Patterns and possibilities for basic writers. Journal of Basic Writing, 6(2), 37-52.
18.
Guerra, J. (1998). Close to home: Oral and literate practices in a transnational Mexicano community. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
22.
Hymes, D. (1975/1981). Breakthrough into performance . In D. Hymes (Ed.), “ In vain I tried to tell you”: Essays in Native American ethnopoetics (pp. 79-141). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23.
Labov, W. (1969). The study of nonstandard English. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, by special arrangement with the Center for Applied Linguistics.
24.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
Lindquist, J. (2002). A place to stand: Politics and persuasion in a working-class bar. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
MacDonald, S.P. (2002). Prose styles, genres, and levels of analysis. Style, 36(4), 618-639.
27.
Moss, B. (2003). A community text arises: A literate text and a literacy tradition in African-American churches. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
28.
Ong, W.J. (1977). Interfaces of the word. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Peirce, C.S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce (Justus Buchler, Ed.). New York: Dover.
30.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.B. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). Unpacking literacy. In M. F. Whiteman (Ed.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication (pp. 71-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Street, B.V. (1985). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Villanueva, V. (1993). Bootstraps: From an American academic of color . Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
