Using a method of topical rhetorical analysis, inspired by K. Burke, to discuss the Ebonics debate, this article demonstrates that conversations about education, particularly writing instruction, have adopted a market rhetoric that limits teachers’ agency. However, reappropriation of this market rhetoric can help writing teachers to imagine and actuate a more empowered and long-sighted agency for themselves. Rhetorical analysis can therefore help educators to understand how local language practices shape their interaction with the rapidly changing material environment of fast capitalism.
Althusser, L. & Balibar, E. (1997). Reading capital(B. Brewster, Trans.). New York: Verso.(Original work published 1968)
2.
Aronowitz, S. (2000). The knowledge factory: Dismantling the corporate university and creating true higher learning. Boston: Beacon.
3.
Barron, N. (2003). Dear saints, dear Stella: Letters examining the messy lines of expectations, stereotypes, and identity in higher education. College Composition and Communication, 55(1), 11-37.
4.
Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison’s light. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
5.
Berger, W. (2001). Advertising today. London: Phaidon.
6.
Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Burke, K. (1973). The philosophy of literary form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Bush, G. W. (2004, September). Education: The promise of America. Retrieved June 7, 2005, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/education/educ_policy_book.pdf
10.
Cleaver, E. (1997, February 4). Ebonics belongs in the streets. Washington Post, p. A36-A36.
11.
Faber, B. (2003). Creating rhetorical stability in corporate university discourse: Discourse technologies and change. Written Communication, 20(4), 391-425.
12.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
13.
Formento, D. (1997, January 17). Black English is not slang. Times-Picayune, p. B6-B6.
14.
Garay, M. S. (1999). Toward a working English for twenty-first century schools and colleges. In M. S. Garay & S. A. Bernhardt (Eds.), Expanding literacies: English teaching and the new workplace(pp. 21-53). Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
16.
Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Gilyard, K., & Richardson, E. (2001). Students’ right to possibility: Basic writing and African-American rhetoric. In A. Greenbaum (Ed.), Insurrections: Approaches to resistance in composition studies(pp. 37-51). Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
Graham, M. B., Birmingham, E., & Zachry, M. (1999). A new way of doing business: Articulating the economics of composition. JAC, 19(4), 679-697.
19.
Henry, J. (2001). Writing workplace cultures. College Composition and Communication Online, 53(2). Available from http://archive.ncte.org/ccc/
20.
Herrnstein Smith, B. (1988). Contingencies of value: Alternative perspectives for critical theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Hitchcock, P. (1997). The value of. In A. Kumar (Eds.), Class issues: Pedagogy, cultural studies and the public sphere(pp. 117-124). New York: New York University Press.
22.
Horner, B. (2001). “Students’ right,” English only, and re-imagining the politics of language. College English, 63, 741-758.
23.
Horner, B., & Trimbur, J. (2002). English only and U.S. college composition. College Composition and Communication, 53, 594-629.
24.
Kennedy, J. (1997, March 14). Ebonics debate has wrought a miracle. Rocky Mountain News, p. 55A-55A.
25.
Kuttner, R. (1996). Everything for sale: The virtues and limits of markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Leff, M. (1983). The topics of argumentative invention in Latin rhetorical theory from Cicero to Boethius. Rhetorica, 1(1), 23-44.
27.
Lu, M. Z. (2004). An essay on the work of composition: Composing English against the order of fast capitalism. College Composition and Communication, 56(1), 16-50.
28.
Marback, R. (2001). Ebonics: Theorizing in public our attitudes toward literacy. College Composition and Communication, 53, 11-32.
29.
Marback, R., & Bruch, P. (1997). Race, identity, writing, and the politics of dignity: Reinvigorating the ethics of “students’ right to their own language.”Journal of Advanced Composition, 17, 266-281.
30.
Marx, K. (1981). Capital: Vol. 3. A critique of political economy(D. Fernbach, Trans.). New York: Penguin. (Original work published 1894)
31.
McCloskey, D. N. (1998). The rhetoric of economics(2nd ed.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. (Original work published 1985)
32.
Palacas, A. (2001). Liberating American Ebonics from Euro-English. College Composition and Communication, 63, 326-352.
33.
Perkins, B. (1997, January 12). Perspective on Black English. Los Angeles Times, p. B17-B17.
34.
Perry, T. (1998). “I ‘on know why they be trippin’”: Reflections on the Ebonics debate. In T. Perry & L. Delpit (Eds.), The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African-American children(pp. 3-16). Boston: Beacon.
35.
Pratt, E. (1996, December 28). Ebonics is not the answer. Advocate, p. 7B-7B.
36.
Reich, R. (2000). The future of success: Working and living in the new economy. New York: Vintage.
37.
Rickford, J. (1998). Holding onto a language of our own: An interview with John Rickford. In T. Perry & L. Delpit (Eds.), The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African-American children(pp. 59-66). Boston: Beacon. (Original work published 1997)
38.
Scott, J. B. (2002). The public policy debate over newborn HIV testing: A case study of the knowledge enthymeme. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 32(2), 57-83.
39.
Scott, J. B. (2003). Extending rhetorical-cultural analysis: Transformations of HIV home testing. College English, 65(4), 349-367.
40.
Secret, C. (1998). Embracing Ebonics and teaching standard English: An interview with Oakland teacher Carrie Secret. In T. Perry & L. Delpit (Eds.), The real Ebonics debate: Power, language, and the education of African-American children(pp. 79-88). Boston:Beacon.
41.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor.
42.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
Smith, C. (2000). Market values in higher education: The pitfalls and promises. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
Smitherman, G. (1999a). African-American student writers in the NAEP, 1969-88/89. In, Talkin that talk: Language, culture, and education in African America(pp. 163-176). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1992)
45.
Smitherman, G. (1999b). The blacker the berry, the sweeter the juice. In, Talkin that talk: Language, culture, and education in African America(pp. 176-191). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1994)
46.
Smitherman, G. (1999c). Ebonics, King, and Oakland: Some folk don’t believe fat meat is greasy. In, Talkin that talk: Language, culture, and education in African America(pp. 150-162). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1998)
47.
Steger, L. P. (1997, January 11). Ebonics, Cajonics, and English. Advocate, p. 7B-7B.
48.
United States Department of Labor Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1992). Skills and tasks for jobs: A SCANS report for America 2000. U.S. Department of Labor: Washington D.C.
49.
Watkins, E. (1993). Throwaways: Work culture and consumer education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
Watkins, E. (1998). Everyday exchanges: Marketwork and capitalist common sense. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51.
Wess, R. (1996). Kenneth Burke: Rhetoric, subjectivity, postmodernism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Wilford, J. C. D. (1997, August 25). Ebonics is absurd, degrading. Advocate, p. 6B-6B.
