Operating from a perspective suggested by Kenneth Burke's analyses of “scope and reduction,” in this response essay the authors begin by reconsidering the Aristotelian and Burkean rhetorical traditions that dominate contemporary organizational rhetoric research. They argue that both traditions can be applied in ways that reduce rhetoric to technique or to discourse. Both reductions slight the complex dialectical relationships among action, agency, and structure that define rhetorical action. Using this framework, the authors examine the core essays in this special issue, concluding that although they largely avoid problems related to discoursism, they are less successful in avoiding the other form of reductionism, treating rhetoric as technique and rhetor as magician. In a coda, the authors return to the assumptions of the Platonic/Aristotelian tradition, find that it contains ethical assumptions that are problematic in a world dominated by corporate power, and suggest an alternative approach.
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149.
2.
Atwill, J. (1998). Rhetoric reclaimed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
Aune, J.A. (1999). Rhetoric and Marxism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
4.
Aune, J.A. (2001). Selling the free market. New York: Guilford.
5.
Bach, B. (1989). Socialization turning points. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 273-293.
6.
Ballif, M. (1998). Writing the third Sophistic cyborg. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 28, 51-72.
7.
Bateson, G., Sluzki, C., & Ransom, D. (1976). Double-bind. Palo Alto, CA : Psychological Corporation.
8.
Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
9.
Bitzer, L. (1980). Functional communication. In E. B. White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition (pp. 62-85). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press .
10.
Black, E. (1978). Rhetorical criticism: A study in method. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press .
11.
Boje, D., & Rosile, G.A. (2003). Life imitates art. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 85-125.
12.
Booth W.C. (2004). The rhetoric of rhetoric: The quest for effective communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell .
13.
Bullis, C., & Tompkins, P. (1989). The forest ranger revisited. Communication Monographs, 56, 287-306.
14.
Burke, K. (1931). Counter-statement. Berkeley : University of California Press.
15.
Burke, K. (1935). Permanence and change. Berkeley : University of California Press.
16.
Burke, K. (1937). Attitudes toward history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Burke, K. (1941). Philosophy of literary form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley : University of California Press.
19.
Burke, K. (1950). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley : University of California Press.
20.
Burke, K. (1961). Rhetoric of religion. Berkeley : University of California Press.
21.
Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Burke, K. (1993). Auscultation, creation, and revision. In J. Chesbro (Ed.), Extensions of the Burkeian system (pp. 42-172). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Campbell, P. (1972). Rhetoric-ritual: A study of the communicative and aesthetic dimensions of language. Belmont, CA: Dickinson.
25.
Cheney, G. (1995). Democracy in the workplace. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 167-200.
26.
Clegg, S. (1989). Frameworks of power. London : Sage .
27.
Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London : Sage.
28.
Conrad, C. (1993). Rhetorical/communication theory as an ontology for structuration research. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 16 (pp. 197-208). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Conrad, C. (2004a). The illusion of reform. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 7, 311-338.
30.
Conrad, C. (2004b). Organizational discourse analysis: Avoiding the determinism-voluntarism trap. Organization, 11, 427-439.
31.
Dacin, T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W.R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 45-56.
32.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Detienne, M., & Vernant, J.-P. (1978). Cunning intelligence in Greek culture and society (J. Lloyd, Trans.). Sussex, UK: Harvester Press.
34.
Foss, S., Foss, K., & Trapp, R. (1991). Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
35.
Fox, M. (2005, October 11). Wayne C. Booth, critic who analyzed rhetoric dies at 84. The New York Times. Retrieved October 12, 2005, from www.nytimes.com.
36.
Frank, D. (2003). After the new rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89, 253-260.
37.
Garver, E. (1994). Aristotle's rhetoric. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
38.
Gergen, K., & Gergen, M. (1987). Narratives of relationship. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee , & P. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships (pp. 269-288). New York: Methuen.
39.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
Gordon, D. (1996). Fat and mean. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
Gordon, M. (2008, January 16). Investor advocates fear tide turning against shareholders. Houston Chronicle, p. D6.
42.
Green, S., Jr., Babb, M., & Alpasian, C.M. (2008). Institutional field dynamics and the competition between institutional logics: The role of rhetoric in the evolving control of the modern corporation. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 40-73.
43.
Grint, K., & Case, P. (1998). The violent rhetoric of re-engineering. Journal of Management Studies, 5, 557-577.
44.
Gross, A.G., & Dearin, R.D. (2003). Chaim Perelman. Albany: State University of New York Press.
45.
Gross, A.G., & Dearin, R.D. (2003). Chaim Perelman. Albany: State University of New York Press.
46.
Guthrie, W.K.C. (1977). The Sophists. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press.
47.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
48.
Hartelius, E.J., & Browning, L.D. (2008). The application of rhetorical theory in managerial research: A literature review. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 13-39.
49.
Hill, F. (1983). The Rhetoric of Aristotle. In J. J. Murphy (Ed.), A synoptic history of classical rhetoric (pp. 19-76). Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press.
50.
Houston Chronicle Editorial Board. (2008, January 18). Caveat investor: Why protect fraudulent companies from lawsuits. Houston Chronicle, p. B8.
51.
Jarratt, S. (1991). Rereading the Sophists. Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press.
52.
Kahn, V. (1994). Machiavellian rhetoric: From the counter-reformation to Milton. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
Kennedy, G. (1980). Classical rhetoric and its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
54.
Kennedy, G. (Trans.). (1991). Aristotle on rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
Kuhn, T., & Ashcraft, K. (2003). Corporate scandal and the theory of the firm. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 20-57.
56.
Kuhrana, R. (2002). Searching for a corporate savior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Lammers, J., & Barbour, J. (2006). An institutional theory of organizational communication . Communication Theory, 16, 356-377.
58.
Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg (Ed.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 115-154). London: Sage.
59.
Lentricchia, F. (1981). After the new criticism. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
60.
Lentricchia, F., & DuBois, A. (Eds.). (2003). Close reading. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
61.
Louis, M.R. (1980). Surprise and sense-making in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
62.
Louis, M.R. (1990). Acculturation in the workplace. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 107-142). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63.
Neel, J. (1988). Plato, Derrida, and writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
64.
Palmer, B. (1990). Descent into discourse. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
65.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1968). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
66.
Perrow, C. (2002). Organizing America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
Pocock, J.G.A. (1975). The Machiavellian moment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
Popper, K. (1962). The open society and its enemies (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
69.
Poulokas, J. (1995). Sophistical rhetoric in classical Greece. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
70.
Pratt, M. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456-493.
71.
Reed, M. (1999). Organizational analysis as discourse analysis: A critique. In D. Grant, T. Keenoy, & C. Oswich (Eds.), Discourse and organization (pp. 193-213). London: Sage.
72.
Reed, M. (2000). The limits of discourse analysis in organization analysis. Organization, 7, 524-530.
73.
Reeve, C.D.C. (1994). Philosophy, politics, and rhetoric in Aristotle . In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle's Rhetoric (pp. 191-205). Berkeley: University of California Press.
74.
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory. Ft. Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
75.
Rorty, A.O. (1994). Structuring rhetoric. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle's Rhetoric (pp. 1-33). Berkeley : University of California Press.
76.
Rosen, M. (1991). Breakfast at Spiro's. In P. Frost, L. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. Lundberg , & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture (pp. 77-89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
77.
Rosenfield, L. (1968). The anatomy of critical discourse. Speech Monographs, 35, 109-119.
78.
Rueckert, W. (1963). Kenneth Burke and the drama of human relations . Berkeley: University of California Press.
79.
Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
80.
Shotter, J. (1984). Social accountability and selfhood. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
81.
Shotter, J., & Gergen, K. (1989). Preface and introduction. In J. Shotter & K. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of identity (pp. ix-xi). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
82.
Soros, G. (1998). The crisis of global capitalism: Open society endangered. New York: Public Affairs Press.
83.
Soros, G. (2000). Open society: Reforming global capitalism. New York: Public Affairs Press.
84.
Steffy, L. (2008a, January 1). Enron-driven reforms are unraveling . Houston Chronicle, p. 1D.
85.
Steffy, L. (2008b, March 20). Law can't stop failure. Houston Chronicle on the Web. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from www.chron.com
86.
Symon, G. (2008). Developing the political perspective on technological change through rhetorical analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 74-98.
87.
Tourish, D. & Vatcha, N. (2006). Charismatic leadership and corporate cultism at Enron. Cultic Studies Review, 5, 455-480.
88.
Walker, J. (2000). Rhetoric and poetics in antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press.
89.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.
90.
Whittle, A., Mueller, F., & Mangan, A. (2008). "In search of subtlety": Discursive devices and rhetorical competences. Management Communication Quarterly , 22(1), 99-122.
