This article investigates one aspect of scientific style in French: the use of tenses. It investigates the claims made in the literature that the verb system of scientific French is a temporal. The frequency of tensed finite forms in 10 French language journal articles on biological sciences is examined. The rhetorical function of past and future tenses is examined and six functions of tense choice are isolated. This analysis suggests that tense marking is actually more complex than previous claims have maintained and that tense choice serves to encode (a) temporal, (b) rhetorical, and (c) structural processes in the scientific text. Tense choice is therefore part of the communicative repertoire of the scientific writer, which writers use to create and communicate information, and which is responsive to the rhetorical demands of communicating about science.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2002). Examining present tense conventions in scientific writing in the light of reader reactions to three Dutch-authored discussions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 5-24.
4.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Curnow, T. J. (1995). The functions of voice in scientific writing in Spanish. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 33-64.
6.
Fossat, J.-L., & Maurand, G. (1976). Les lexiques techniques français [French technical lexicons]. Toulouse, France: University of Toulouse.
7.
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8.
Givón, T. (1990). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9.
Grévisse, M. (1993). Le bon usage [Good usage] (13th ed.). Paris: Duculot.
10.
Gross, A. G. (1990). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Gross, A. G., Harmon, J. R., & Reidy, M. (2002). Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
Grundstrom, A. W. (1983). L’analyse du français [The analysis of French]. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
13.
Guilbert, L. (1973). La specificité du terme scientifique et technique [The specificity of the scientific and technical term]. Français moderne, 17, 5-17.
14.
Jones, M. A. (1996). Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Kocourek, R. (1982). La langue française de la technique et de la science [French technical and scientific language]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Brandstetter.
16.
Lackstrom, J. E., Selinker, L., & Trimble, L. P. (1972). Grammar and technical English. English Teaching Forum, 10(5), 3-14.
17.
Lackstrom, J. E., Selinker, L., & Trimble, L. P. (1973). Technical rhetorical principles and grammatical choice. TESOL Quarterly, 7, 127-132.
18.
Le Bidois, G., & Le Bidois, R. (1971). Syntaxe du français moderne [Syntax of modern French]. Paris: Picard.
19.
Lerat, P. (1995). Les langues spécialisées [Specialized languages]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de la France.
20.
Liddicoat, A. J. (1992). The use of the active and passive in French scientific prose: Some examples from the biological sciences. Rassegna italiana di linguistica applicata, 14(2), 105-121.
21.
Liddicoat, A. J. (1997a). Communicating within cultures, communicating across cultures, communicating between cultures. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.), Academic literacy across disciplines and cultures (pp. 12-23). Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology.
22.
Liddicoat, A. J. (1997b). The function of the conditional in French scientific writing. Linguistics, 35, 767-780.
23.
Liddicoat, A. J. (1997c). Texts of the culture and texts of the discourse community. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.), Academic literacy across disciplines and cultures (pp. 38-41). Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology.
24.
Locke, D. (1992). Science as writing. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Malcolm, L. (1987). What rules govern tense usage in scientific articles?English for Specific Purposes, 6, 31-44.
26.
Monville-Burton, M., & Waugh, L. R. (1991). Multiple meanings in context: The French present tense. In J. Gvozdanovic & T. Janssen (Eds.), The function of tense in texts (pp. 183-196). Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.
27.
Oster, S. (1981). The use of tenses in reporting past literature. In L. Selinker, E. Tarone, & V. Hanzeli (Eds.), English for academic and technical purposes: Studies in honour of Louis Trimble (pp. 76-90). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
28.
Pawley, A. (1991). How to talk cricket: On linguistic competence in a subject matter. In R. Blust (Ed.), Currents in Pacific Linguistics: Papers on Austronesian languages and ethnolinguistics in honour of George Grace (pp. 339-368). Canberra, Australia: Pacific Linguistics.
29.
Pettinari, C. (1982). The function of a grammatical alternative in fourteen surgical reports. Applied Linguistics, 4, 55-76.
30.
Phal, A. (1968). De la language quotidienne à la langue des sciences et des techniques [From everyday language to the language of science and technology]. Le Français dans le monde, 61, 12-19.
31.
Phal, A. (1969). La recherche en lexicologie au CREDIF: La part du lexique commun dans les vocabulaires scientifique et technique [Lexicology research at the CREDIF: The share of the everyday lexicon in scientific and technical vocabularies]. Langue française, 2, 73-81.
32.
Phal, A. (1971). Vocabulaire général d’orientation scientifique [Ageneral vocabulary of scientific use]. Paris: Didier.
33.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Swales, J. (1992). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1981). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. ESP Journal, 1(2), 123-140.
36.
Trimble, L. (1985). English for science and technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Trimble, M. T., & Trimble, L. (1982). Rhetorical-grammatical features of scientific and technical texts as a major factor in ESP communication. In J. Hoedt, L. Lundquist, H. Picht, & J. Qvistgaard (Eds.), Pragmatics and LSP (pp. 199-216). Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen School of Economics.
38.
Vigner, G., & Martin, A. (1976). Le français technique [Technical French]. Paris: Didier.
39.
Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
