The U.S. South has experienced rapid Latinx growth; yet, little is known about how Latinx residents are civically integrating into new communities. This article explores whether, where, and why Latinx in Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina, are civically engaged. Participants in a Latino Civic Engagement Project conducted 382 surveys with fellow Latinx residents in a county with Latinx growth rates over 1,800% from 1990 to 2014. Among respondents, 58.5% had volunteered in the past year and 47.0% were members of a faith-based or charitable organization. Household income, educational attainment, and English proficiency were most strongly correlated with civic engagement (r = .456, r = .453, and r = .464, respectively). The main reason for engagement was the betterment of the Latinx community. Main barriers were lack of information (37.1%), limited time (17.2%), disinterest (7.8%), and documentation status (4.3%). Findings can shape conversations about Latinx engagement in ways that include, but go beyond, voting and political representation.
American Community Survey. (2017). 2013-2017 estimates (Data). U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov
2.
BedollaL. G. (2012). Latino education, civic engagement, and the public good. Review of Research in Education, 36, 23-42.
3.
BeyerleinK.HippJ. R. (2006). From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, 53, 97-117.
FloresW. V.BenmayorR. (Eds.). (1997). Latino cultural citizenship: Claiming identity, space, and rights. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
7.
Foster-BeyJ. (2008). Do race, ethnicity, citizenship and socio-economic status determine civic-engagement? (CIRCLE Working Paper No. 62). Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. Retrieved from https://civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP62_Foster.Bey.pdf
8.
FragaL. R.FrostA. (2010). Democratic institutions, public engagement, and Latinos in American public schools. In OrrM.RogersJ. (Eds.), Public engagement for public education (pp. 117-138). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Gil de ZúñigaH.JungN.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals; social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319-336.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (n.d.). The international study of civic education instrument. Retrieved from www.terpconnect.umd.edu/~jtpurta/studentQ.htm
12.
JensenL. A. (2008). Immigrants’ cultural identities as sources of civic engagement. Applied Development Science, 12, 74-83.
13.
Jones-CorreaM. (1998). Different paths: Gender, immigration and political participation. International Migration Review, 32, 326-349.
14.
Jones-CorreaM. (2005). Bringing outsiders in: Questions of immigrant incorporation. In HeroR. E.WolbrechtC. (Eds.), The politics of democratic inclusion (pp. 75-101). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15.
LealD.HessF. (2000). The politics of bilingual education expenditures in urban school districts. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 1064-1072.
16.
MarceloK. B.LopezM. H.KirbyE. H. (2007). Civic engagement among minority youth (Fact sheet). Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
17.
MarrowH. B. (2005). New destinations and immigrant incorporation. Perspectives on Politics, 3, 781-799.
18.
MarrowH. B. (2009). Immigrant bureaucratic incorporation: The dual roles of professional missions and government policies. American Sociological Review, 74, 756-776.
19.
McDevittM.KiousisS. (2006). Experiments in political socialization: Kids voting USA as a model for civic education reform (Working Paper No. 49). Washington, DC: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
20.
NeimanM.ReyesB.FragaL. R.KrimmD. (2010). Examining Latino representation on California’s school boards: Its impact on perceptions of district problems, priorities, and policies. San Francisco, CA: César Chávez Institute Policy Research Series, San Francisco State University.
21.
OsterlingJ. P. (2001). Waking the sleeping giant: Engaging and capitalizing on the sociocultural strengths of the Latino community. Bilingual Research Journal, 25, 59-88.
22.
PriceP. L.LukinbealC.GioiosoR. N.ArreolaD. D.FernándezD. J.ReadyT.de los Angeles TorresM. (2011). Placing Latino civic engagement. Urban Geography, 32, 179-207.
23.
ReadyT.KnightR. A.Chang-ChunS. (2006). Latino civic and community involvement: Findings from the Chicago-area survey. Notre Dame, IN: Institute for Latino Studies, University of Notre Dame.
24.
SchuchJ. C.Vasquez-HuotL. (2019). Promoting Latinx leadership and representation: Findings from a civic engagement project. Latino Studies, 17 (4).
25.
ShahP. (2009). Motivating participation: The symbolic effects of Latino representation on parent school involvement. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 212-230.
26.
SmithB. E.WindersJ. (2008). “We’re here to stay”: Economic restructuring, Latino migration and place-making in the US South. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 60-72.
27.
WilkinH. A.KatzV. S.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2009). The role of family interaction in new immigrant Latinos’ civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 59, 387-406.
28.
WindersJ. (2012). Seeing immigrants: Institutional visibility and immigrant incorporation in new immigrant destinations. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 641, 58-78.
