This article examines the ways in which Latino immigrants’ use of news media from their home countries influences their likelihood of participating in politics in the United States. Using data from the 2015 Latino National Health and Immigration Survey of 1,005 Latino adults in the United States, I run a set of multivariate analyses to determine whether home-country media use affects the likelihood that Latino immigrants, 52% of whom use home-country media at least a few times per week, will vote, participate in political protests, attend meetings, sign a petition, or make a donation to political causes. I find that home-country media use has a significant, independent effect on the likelihood of protesting and signing petitions. This article bridges our understanding of media effects on participation for Latino immigrants and the importance of transnational political behavior to civic participation and incorporation of immigrants in the United States.
ArceneauxK.JohnsonM. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BarretoM. A.MuñozJ. A. (2003). Reexamining the “politics of in-between”: Political participation among Mexican immigrants in the United States. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 427-447.
4.
BowlerS.SeguraG. (2012). The future is ours: Minority politics, political behavior, and the multiracial era of American politics. Los Angeles, CA: CQ Press.
5.
BrantonR.DunawayJ. (2008). English- and Spanish-language media coverage of immigration: A comparative analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 89, 1006-1022.
CroucherS. L. (2003). Perpetual imagining: Nationhood in a global era. International Studies Review, 5, 1-24.
8.
DaltonR. J. (2002). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (2nd ed.). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
9.
de la GarzaR. O.LowellB. L. (Eds.). (2002). Sending money home: Hispanic remittances and community development. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
EscobarC. (2007). Extraterritorial political rights and dual citizenship in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 42, 43-75.
11.
EscriváA.Santa CruzU.BermúdezA. (2010). Migration, gender, and politics: The 2006 Peruvian elections abroad. Latin American Perspectives, 37, 106-120.
12.
Estévez LópezA. (2009). La relación estructural entre la globalización y la migración: Implicaciones para una ciudadanía universal (The structural relationship between globalization and migration: Implications for universal citizenship). Foro Internacional, 49, 559-594.
13.
FélixA.GonzálezC.RamírezR. (2008). Political protest, ethnic media, and Latino naturalization. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 618-634.
14.
GershonS. A.PantojaA. D. (2013). Pessimists, optimists, and skeptics: The consequences of transnational ties for Latino immigrant naturalization. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 328-342.
15.
GoodmanG. L.HiskeyJ. T. (2008). Exit without leaving: Political disengagement in high migration municipalities in Mexico. Comparative Politics, 40, 169-188.
16.
GuarnizoL. E.PortesA.HallerW. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 1211-1248.
17.
Jones CorreaM. (1998). Between two nations: The political predicament of Latinos in New York City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
Jones CorreaM. (2001a). Institutional and contextual factors in immigrant citizenship and voting. Citizenship Studies, 5, 41-56.
19.
Jones CorreaM. (2001b). Under two flags: Dual nationality in Latin America and its consequences for naturalization in the United States. International Migration Review, 35, 997-1029.
LuskinR. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 331-361.
22.
Medina VidalD. X. (2017). Immigration politics and group consciousness for newcomers to southern US politics. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5, 679-706.
23.
MerollaJ. L.PantojaA. D.CargileI. A. M.MoraJ. (2013). From coverage to action: The immigration debate and its effects on participation. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 322-335.
24.
Nolan GarcíaK. A. (2011). Transnational advocates and labor rights enforcement in the North American Free Trade Agreement. Latin American Politics and Society, 53, 29-60.
25.
PantojaA. (2005). Transnational ties and immigrant political incorporation: The case of Dominicans in Washington Heights, New York. International Migration, 43, 123-146.
26.
PortesA. (2007). Migration, development, and segmented assimilation: A conceptual review of the evidence. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610, 73-97.
27.
PortesA.RumbautR. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
RamírezR. (2013). Mobilizing opportunities: The evolving Latino electorate and the future of American politics. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
29.
SánchezG. R.PedrazaF. I.VargasE. D. (2015). National Latino health and immigration survey. Albuquerque: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Center for Health Policy at the University of New Mexico.
30.
Santamaría GómezA. (2003). Politics without borders of postmodern nationality: Mexican immigration to the United States. Latin American Perspectives, 30, 66-86.
31.
SchmidtR.Sr.Alex-AssensohY. M.AokiA. L.HeroR. E. (2009). Newcomers, outsiders, and insiders: Immigrants and American racial politics in the early twenty-first century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32.
StillermanJ. (2003). Transnational activist networks and the emergence of labor internationalism in the NAFTA countries. Social Science History, 27, 577-601.
33.
Subervi-VélezF. A. (2008). The mass media and Latino politics: Studies of U.S. media content, campaign strategies and survey research, 1984-2004. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
Vargas RamosC. (2011). Caribbeans in New York: Political participation, strategic cooperation and the prospect for pan-ethnic political mobilization in the diaspora. Caribbean Studies, 39, 65-103.
35.
WalsS. C. (2011). Does what happens in Los Mochis stay in Los Mochis? Explaining postmigration political behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 600-611.
36.
Zepeda MillánC. (2014). Perceptions of threat, demographic diversity, and the framing of illegality: Explaining (non)participation in New York’s 2006 immigrant protests. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 880-888.
