This article examines the effect of exposure to post-9/11 stigmatization on various types of Muslim political engagement, using a mixed-methods approach that combines propensity score matching analysis of data from the Muslims in the American Public Square (MAPS) survey administered immediately after 9/11 with experimental data of the U.S. Muslim population. I find that increased discrimination results in increased political interest but has a neutral or dampening effect on political participation. I use experimental data to argue that group identification acts as a partial mediator in this relationship, especially in accounting for the increase in political interest in response to discrimination.
BakalianAnnyBozorgmehrMedhi. 2009. Backlash 9/11: Middle Eastern and Muslim Americans Respond. University of California Press.
2.
BloemraadIrene. 2006. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
3.
BranscombeNyla R.SchmittMichael T.HarveyRichard D.1999. “Perceiving Pervasive Discrimination among African Americans: Implications for Group Identification and Well-Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(1):135–49.
4.
BullockJohn G.GreenDonald P.HaShang E.2010. “Yes, but What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer).” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(4):550–58.
5.
CampbellAngus. 1954. The Voter Decides. New York: Row, Peterson.
6.
CongePatrick J.1988. “The Concept of Political Participation: Toward a Definition.” Comparative Politics20(2):241–49.
7.
ConnellyGordon M.1945. “The Questions the Polls Ask: Now Let’s Look at the Real Problem: Validity.” Public Opinion Quarterly9(1):51–60.
8.
CooleyCharles Horton. 1983. Human Nature and the Social Order. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
9.
DawsonMichael C.1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
DeSipioLouis. 2002. Immigrant Organizing, Civic Outcomes: Civic Engagement, Political Activity, National Attachment, and Identity in Latino Immigrant Communities. St. Mary’s City, MD: Center for the Study of Democracy.
DionKenneth L.DionKaren K.PakAnita W.1992. “Personality-Based Hardiness as a Buffer for Discrimination-Related Stress in Members of Toronto’s Chinese Community.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement24(4):517–36.
13.
DishaIlirCavendishJames C.KingRyan D.2011. “Historical Events and Spaces of Hate: Hate Crimes against Arabs and Muslims in Post-9/11 America.” Social Problems58(1):21–46.
14.
FleischmannFenellaPhaletKarenKleinOlivier. 2011. “Religious Identification and Politicization in the Face of Discrimination: Support for Political Islam and Political Action among the Turkish and Moroccan Second Generation in Europe.” British Journal of Social Psychology50(4):628–48.
15.
GallegoAinaOberskiDaniel. 2012. “Personality and Political Participation: The Mediation Hypothesis.” Political Behavior34(3):425–51.
16.
GoffmanErving. 1986. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Reissue ed. New York: Touchstone.
17.
GurinPatriciaEppsEdgar. 1975. Black Consciousness, Identity, and Achievement: A Study of Students in Historically Black Colleges. New York: Wiley.
18.
GurrTed Robert. 2011. Why Men Rebel. London: Routledge.
19.
HabermanAlexander Burns MaggieParkerAshley. 2016. “Donald Trump’s Confrontation with Muslim Soldier’s Parents Emerges as Unexpected Flash Point.” The New York Times, July31.
20.
HarderValerie S.StuartElizabeth A.AnthonyJames C.2010. “Propensity Score Techniques and the Assessment of Measured Covariate Balance to Test Causal Associations in Psychological Research.” Psychological Methods15(3):234–49.
21.
KarpJeffrey A.BanducciSusan A.2008. “Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science38(2):311–34.
22.
KlandermansBertvan der ToornJojannekevan StekelenburgJacquelien. 2008. “Embeddedness and Identity: How Immigrants Turn Grievances into Action.” American Sociological Review73(6):992–1012.
23.
LaGuminaSalvatore John. 1999. Wop!: A Documentary History of Anti-Italian Discrimination in the United States. Montreal: Guernica Editions.
24.
LamontMichèle. 2014. “Reflections Inspired by Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks by Andreas Wimmer.” Ethnic and Racial Studies37(5):814–19.
25.
LamontMicheleWelburnJessica S.FlemingCrystal. 2013. “Responses to Discrimination and Social Resilience Under Neo-Liberalism: The United States Compared.” Pp. 129–57 in Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Age, edited by HallP. A.LamontM.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
MannH. B.WhitneyD. R.1947. “On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables Is Stochastically Larger than the Other.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics18(1):50–60.
28.
MattilaMikkoPapageorgiouAchillefs. 2017. “Disability, Perceived Discrimination and Political Participation.” International Political Science Review38(5):505–19.
29.
McKnightPatrick E.NajabJulius. 2010. “Mann-Whitney U Test.” Pp. 960-961in The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, edited by WeinerIrving B.CraigheadW. Edward. New York: Wiley.
30.
McLeodJackScheufeleDietramMoyPatricia. 1999. “Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation.” Political Communication16(3):315–36.
31.
MettlerSuzanne. 2002. “Bringing the State Back in to Civic Engagement: Policy Feedback Effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II Veterans.” The American Political Science Review96(2):351–65.
32.
MilbrathLester W.1977. Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?2nd ed. Edited by GoelM. L.Chicago: Rand McNally.
33.
MillerArthur H.GurinPatriciaGurinGeraldMalanchukOksana. 1981. “Group Consciousness and Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science25(3):494–511.
34.
PeekLori. 2005. “Becoming Muslim: The Development of a Religious Identity.” Sociology of Religion66(3):215–42.
RedersdorffSandrineMartinotDelphineBranscombeNyla. 2004. “The Impact of Thinking about Group-Based Disadvantages or Advantages on Women’s Well-Being: An Experimental Test of the Rejection-Identification Model.” Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive22(2):203–22.
37.
RobinsonGreg. 2009. By Order of the President: FDR and the Internment of Japanese Americans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
RodgersHarrell R.1974. “Toward Explanation of the Political Efficacy and Political Cynicism of Black Adolescents: An Exploratory Study.” American Journal of Political Science18(2):257–82.
39.
RosenbaumPaul R.2002. Observational Studies, Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer.
40.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika70(1):41–55.
41.
RosenbergMorris. 1954. “Some Determinants of Political Apathy.” Public Opinion Quarterly18(4):349–66.
42.
RubinDonald. 1978. “Multiple Imputations in Sample Surveys: A Phenomenological [Bayesian] Approach to Nonresponse.” Pp. 20–28 in Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. Boston: AMSA.
43.
RubinDonald B.2001. “Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation.” Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology2(3–4):169–88.
44.
SalamonLester M.Van EveraStephen. 1973. “Fear, Apathy, and Discrimination: A Test of Three Explanations of Political Participation.” The American Political Science Review67(4):1288–306.
45.
SaundersClareGrassoMariaOlceseCristianaRainsfordEmilyRootesChristopher. 2012. “Explaining Differential Protest Participation: Novices, Returners, Repeaters, and Stalwarts.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly17(3):263–80.
46.
SchildkrautDeborah J.2004. “Identity, Perceptions of Discrimination and Political Engagement: The Causes and Consequences of Reactive Identity Among Latinos.” Pp. 1–31 in Conference Papers—American Political Science Association. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
47.
SchildkrautDeborah J.2005. “The Rise and Fall of Political Engagement among Latinos: The Role of Identity and Perceptions of Discrimination.” Political Behavior27(3):285–312.
48.
SchmittMichael T.BranscombeNyla R.2002. “The Meaning and Consequences of Perceived Discrimination in Disadvantaged and Privileged Social Groups.” European Review of Social Psychology12(1):167–99.
49.
SchmittMichael T.SpearsRussellBranscombeNyla R.2003. “Constructing a Minority Group Identity out of Shared Rejection: The Case of International Students.” European Journal of Social Psychology33(1):1–12.
50.
SellersRobert M.CaldwellCleopatra H.Schmeelk-ConeKaren H.ZimmermanMarc A.2003. “Racial Identity, Racial Discrimination, Perceived Stress, and Psychological Distress among African American Young Adults.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior44(3):302–17.
51.
SellersRobert M.SheltonJ. Nicole. 2003. “The Role of Racial Identity in Perceived Racial Discrimination.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(5):1079–92.
ShinglesRichard D.1981. “Black Consciousness and Political Participation: The Missing Link.” The American Political Science Review75(1):76–91.
54.
SimonBerndGrabowOlga. 2010. “The Politicization of Migrants: Further Evidence That Politicized Collective Identity Is a Dual Identity.” Political Psychology31(5):717–38.
55.
SimonBerndKlandermansBert. 2001. “Politicized Collective Identity: A Social Psychological Analysis.” American Psychologist56(4):319–31.
56.
SimonBerndRuhsDaniela. 2008. “Identity and Politicization among Turkish Migrants in Germany: The Role of Dual Identification.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95(6):1354–66.
57.
SpencerSteven J.ZannaMark P.FongGeoffrey T.2005. “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(6):845–51.
58.
StackLiam. 2015. “American Muslims under Attack.” The New York Times, December22.
59.
StokesAtiya Kai. 2003. “Latino Group Consciousness and Political Participation.” American Politics Research31(4):361–78.
60.
StoufferSamuel A.SuchmanEdward A.DeVinneyLeland C.StarShirley A.WilliamsRobin M.1949. The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C.1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Pp. 33–47 in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by AustinW. G.WorchelS.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
62.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C.2004. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” Pp. 276–93 in Political Psychology: Key Readings in social Psychology, edited by JostJ. T.SidaniusJ.New York: Psychology Press.
63.
ThoitsPeggy A.2011. “Resisting the Stigma of Mental Illness.” Social Psychology Quarterly74(1):6–28.
64.
TittleCharles R.HillRichard J.1967. “The Accuracy of Self-Reported Data and Prediction of Political Activity.” The Public Opinion Quarterly31(1):103–106.
65.
TraugottMichael W.KatoshJohn P.1979. “Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly43(3):359–77.
66.
UhlanerCarole J.CainBruce E.Roderick KiewietD.1989. “Political Participation of Ethnic Minorities in the 1980s.” Political Behavior11(3):195–231.
67.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedGroenendykEric W.GregorowiczKryshaHutchingsVincent L.2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics73(1):156–70.
68.
VerbaSidneyBurnsNancySchlozmanKay Lehman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics59(04):1051–72.
69.
VerbaSidneyNieNorman H.1987. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70.
VickersJillIsaacAnnette. 2012. The Politics of Race: Canada, the United States, and Australia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
71.
WalkerIainSmithHeather J.2002. Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
WimmerAndreas. 2013. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
73.
WrightStephen C.TroppLinda R.2002. “Collective Action in Response to Disadvantage: Intergroup Perceptions, Social Identification, and Social Change.” Pp. 200–36 in Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration, edited by WalkerI.SmithH. J.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
