For two decades, it has been recommended that assessment of literacy for preschool children be conducted in a child’s primary language. However, only a few literacy assessments have been validated with a preschool, Spanish-speaking population. The purpose of the present study was to test the latent structure of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening for Preschool (PALS-PreK) Español with a sample of Spanish-speaking children in the southwestern United States. Children who could recognize at least 16 uppercase and nine lowercase letters were included in the analyses. Subscales of the PreK Español included Name Writing, Letter/Sound Association, Print Concepts, and Rhyme Awareness. Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a two-factor model of alphabet knowledge (upper and lowercase letter recognition, letter sounds) and print and phonological awareness (name writing, print and rhyme awareness, letter sounds) with letter sounds loading on both factors. We found that the structure of PALS-PreK Español is similar to the English version and discussed implications.
AugustD.HakutaK. (1998). Educating language minority children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (2008). Developing reading and writing in second-language learners: Lessons from the report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BarruecoS.LopezM.OngC.LozanoP. (2012). Assessing Spanish-English bilingual preschoolers: A guide to best approaches and measures. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
4.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5.
BentlerP. M.WuE. J. C. (2002). EQS 6 for Windows guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
6.
BialystokE. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 3-11.
7.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
8.
CimettaA. C.MarxR. W.YadenD. B.Jr.AlkhadimG. S.CutshawC. A. (in press). Latent variable structure and measurement invariance of a modified early literacy assessment. Manuscript under review. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology.
9.
ComfreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
FordK. L.InvernizziM. A.HuangF. (2014). Predicting first grade reading achievement for Spanish-speaking kindergartners: Is early literacy screening in English valid?Literacy Research and Instruction, 53, 269-286.
11.
GiamboD. A.SzecsiT. (2015). Promoting and maintaining bilingualism and biliteracy: Cognitive and biliteracy benefits and strategies for monolingual teachers. Open Communication Journal, 9(1), 56-60.
12.
GraueM. E. (1993). Ready for what? Constructing meanings of readiness for kindergarten. Albany: State University of New York Press.
13.
GraueM. E. (2006). The answer is readiness—Now what is the question?Early Education and Development, 17, 43-56.
14.
GuadagnoliE.VelicerW. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.
15.
HairJ. F. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
17.
HuangF. L.FordK.InvernizziM.FanX. (2013). Measuring early Spanish literacy: Factor structure and measurement invariance for the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening for Kindergartners in Spanish (PALS Español K). Unpublished manuscript. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virgina, Curry School of Education.
18.
HuangF. L.KonoldT. R. (2014). A latent variable investigation of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening-Kindergarten assessment: Construct identification and multigroup comparisons between Spanish-speaking English-language learners (ELLs) and non-ELL students. Language Testing, 31, 205-221.
19.
HuangF. L.TortorelliL. S.InvernizziM. A. (2014). An investigation of factors associated with letter-sound knowledge at kindergarten entry. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 182-192.
20.
InvernizziM.MeierJ.JuelC. (2009). Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening (PALS) grades 1-2. Charlottesville: Curry School of Education, University of Virginia.
21.
InvernizziM.SullivanA.MeierJ.SwankL. (2004). Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening PreK. Charlottesville: Curry School of Education, University of Virginia.
22.
KaganS. L.MooreE.BredekampS. (1995). Reconsidering children’s early learning and development: Toward shared beliefs and vocabulary (ED 391576, pp. 1-56). Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel. Retrieved from the ERIC database.
23.
LesauxN. K.GevaE.KodaK.SiegelL. S.ShanahanT. (2008). Development of literacy in second-language learners. In AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Developing reading and writing in second-language learners: Lessons from the report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
LuriaA. R. (1998). The development of writing in the child. In Kohl de OliveiraM.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Literacy in human development (pp. 15-56). Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Company. (Originally published 1929).
25.
MilfontT.FischerR. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111-121.
26.
MulliganG. M.McCarrollJ. C.FlanaganK. D.PotterD. (2015). Findings from the second-grade rounds of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2012–11 (ECLS-K: 2011) (NCES 2015-077). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
27.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Where we stand on assessing young English language learners. Washington, DC: Author.
28.
National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement. (2014). Increasing provider engagement in quality rating and improvement systems. Retrieved from http://qirsnetwork.org
Scott-LittleC.KaganS. L.FrelowV. S. (2006). Conceptualization of readiness and the content of early learning standards: The intersection of policy and research?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 153-173.
35.
ShahR.GoldsteinS. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 148-169.
36.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
37.
SnowK. (2006). Measuring school readiness: Conceptual and practical considerations. Early Education and Development, 17, 7-41.
38.
SnowK. (2011). Developing kindergarten readiness and other large-scale assessment systems: Necessary considerations in the assessment of young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
39.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
40.
TerryN. P.BinghamG.HartR. (2011). Read right from the start: Georgia pre-K Professional Development Project: Year 2 Evaluation. Atlanta: Georgia State University.
41.
TolchinskyL. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being. New York: Psychology Press.
42.
TownsendM.KonoldT. R. (2010). Measuring early literacy skills: A latent variable investigation of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening for Preschool. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 115-128.
43.
YadenD. B.CimettaA.MarxR. W.TarenD.PerryN.EnzB.GallagherL. (2011). Arizona Kindergarten Readiness Study (Technical Report No. 1). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, College of Education.
44.
YadenD. B.Jr.RuedaR.TardibuonoJ.MartinezC.MirzaeiA.Scott-WeichB.TsaiT. (2014). Interviewing young children using psycho- and micro-genetic design methodology to assess understandings of reading and writing: The promise and challenge. In SarachoO.SpodekB. (Eds.), Review of Research Methodologies: Vol. II. Handbook of research methods in early childhood education (pp. 309-348). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
