Empathy is assumed to be a universal human motivation to act altruistically toward others. Developmental models of empathy explaining when and how children acquire the capacity to empathize have been proposed. However, the existing knowledge is largely built upon studies conducted in the Western context. To fill this gap, a cross-culturally validated measure of empathy for children is needed. The purpose of this study was to assess the Japanese version of the Empathy Questionnaire (EmQue), a parent-reported measure of empathy in preschool children, including its construct validity, measurement invariance across genders, and reliability. A total of 550 children aged 1–6 years participated in this study (Mage = 4.17 years, SD = 1.21). Their mothers completed the Japanese EmQue. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the hypothesized three-factor structure (emotional contagion, attention to others’ feelings, and prosocial actions) in the 13-item Japanese EmQue. The internal consistencies of the three scales were high. Measurement invariance across gender groups was also supported. Overall, the results demonstrate that the Japanese EmQue is a reliable and valid measure of the empathy of Japanese preschool children. It can serve as a tool in future studies to elucidate the role of culture in shaping empathy in early childhood.
ArlotS.CelisseA. (2010). A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys, 4, 40–79. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS054
2.
AtkinsD.UskulA. K.CooperN. R. (2016). Culture shapes empathic responses to physical and social pain. Emotion, 16(5), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000162
3.
BallC. L.SmetanaJ. G.Sturge-AppleM. L. (2016). Following my head and my heart: Integrating preschoolers’ empathy, theory of mind, and moral judgments. Child Development, 88(2), 597–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12605
4.
BollenK. A. (1989). Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Applied probability and statistics section. Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
5.
BrislinR. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW.BerryJ. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Sage.
6.
BrownT. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
7.
ByrneM. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CasselsT. G.ChanS.ChungW. (2010). The role of culture in affective empathy: Cultural and bicultural differences. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853710X531203
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
10.
ChopikW. J.O’BrienE.KonrathS. H. (2017). Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 48(1), 23–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022116673910
DecetyJ.SvetlovaM. (2012). Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003
13.
de WaalF. B. M. (2009). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Harmony Books.
14.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
15.
EggumN. D.EisenbergN.KaoK.SpinradT. L.BolnickR.HoferC.KupferA. S.FabriciusW. V. (2011). Emotion understanding, theory of mind, and prosocial orientation: Relations over time in early childhood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.536776
16.
FloraD. (2020). Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates. Advances in Methods and Practice in Psychological Science, 3(4), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951747
17.
GrazzaniI.OrnaghiV.PepeA.BrazzelliE.RieffeC. (2016). The Italian Version of the Empathy Questionnaire for 18- to 36-months-old children: Psychometric properties and measurement invariance across gender of the EmQue-I13. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1140640
18.
HarknessJ. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In HarknessJ. A.van de VijverF. J. R.MohlerP. P. (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 35–56). Wiley.
19.
HoffmanM. L. (1987). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In EisenbergN.StrayerJ. (Eds.), Empathy and its development. University of Cambridge Press.
20.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
21.
ImutaK.HenryJ. D.SelcukB.SlaughterV. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000140
22.
IshiguroM.SakamotoY.KitagawaG. (1997). Bootstrapping log likelihood and EIC, an extension of AIC. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 49, 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003158526504
23.
KishtonB. M.WidamanK. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054003022
24.
LazdauskasT.NasvytienėD. (2021). Psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of empathy questionnaires for children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1772048
25.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford.
26.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
27.
LittleT. D.LindenbergerU. & NesselroadeJ. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.192
28.
Lucas-MolinaB.SarmentoR.QuintanillaL.Giménez-DasíM. (2018). The Spanish version of the Empathy Questionnaire (EmQue): Evidence for longitudinal measurement invariance and relationship with emotional regulation. Early Education and Development, 29(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2018.1427929
29.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130−149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
30.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224−253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
31.
MatsumotoD.YooS. H.NakagawaS. (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.925
32.
MatsunagaM. (2008). Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(4):260–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450802458935
MustanskiB. S. (2001). Getting wired: Exploiting the Internet for the collection of valid sexuality data. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490109552100
PonterottoJ. G.RuckdeschelD. E. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.105.7.997-1014
37.
PrestonC. C.ColmanA. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
38.
RajhansP.MissanaM.KrolK. M.GrossmannT. (2015). The association of temperament and maternal empathy with individual differences in infants’ neural responses to emotional body expressions. Development and Psychopathology, 27(4), 1205–1216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000772
39.
R Core Team. (2020). A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
40.
RieffeC.KetelaarL.WiefferinkC. H. (2010). Assessing empathy in young children: Construction and validation of an Empathy Questionnaire (EmQue). Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.046
41.
RobinsonJ. L.Zahn-WaxlerC.EmdeR. N. (1994). Patterns of development in early empathic behavior: Environmental and child constitutional influences. Social Development, 3(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1994.tb00032.x
42.
SallquistJ.EisenbergN.SpinradT. L.EggumN. D.GaertnerB. M. (2009). Assessment of preschoolers’ positive empathy: Concurrent and longitudinal relations with positive emotion, social competence, and sympathy. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902819444
43.
SchweizerK. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000001
44.
SpinradT. L.StifterC. A. (2006). Toddlers’ empathy-related responding to distress: Predictions from negative emotionality and maternal behavior in infancy. Infancy, 10(2), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in1002_1
45.
TelleN. T.PfisterH. R. (2016). Positive empathy and prosocial behavior: A neglected link. Emotion Review, 8(2), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915586817
46.
ThompsonR. A. (1991). Emotional regulation and emotional development. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 269–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01319934
47.
TrommsdorffG. (1995). Person context relations as developmental conditions for empathy and prosocial action: A cross-cultural analysis. In KindermannT. A.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Development of person-context relations (pp. 113–146). Lawrence Erlbaum.
TrommsdorffG. (2015). Development of moral values in cultural contexts. In JensenL. A. (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of human development and culture: An interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford University Press.
50.
VaishA.CarpenterM.TomaselloM. (2009). Sympathy through affective perspective-taking and its relation to prosocial behavior in toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014322
51.
Van der MarkI. L.Van IjzendoornM. H.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J. (2002). Development of empathy in girls during the second year of life: Associations with parenting, attachment, and temperament. Social Development, 11(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00210
52.
WellmanH. M.CrossD.WatsonJ. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304
53.
YoungS. K.FoxN. A.Zahn-WaxlerC. (1999). The relations between temperament and empathy in 2-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.35.5.1189
54.
Zahn-WaxlerC.Radke-YarrowM. (1990). The origins of empathic concern. Motivation and Emotion, 14, 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991639
55.
Zahn-WaxlerC.Radke-YarrowM.WagnerE.ChapmanM. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.126
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
