Weaver compared the work attitudes of Mexican Americans and Euro-Americans with data from 19 nationwide public opinion surveys. He found Mexican Americans productive, cooperative, and networking with a strong sense of work ethic and job satisfaction. Since 2000, the Mexican American population has grown by 57% to 32.9 million. It is more native born, more proficient in English, better educated, more often in important jobs, and has spread across the country. Yet, many live in poverty, and their labor force participation and median household income have declined. To investigate whether their work attitudes have been affected, Weaver’s study was replicated with data from three recent nationwide public opinion surveys to compare 326 Mexican Americans and 2,166 Euro-Americans. The results showed Mexican American work attitudes had become even more favorable. The findings placed beyond doubt the question of whether the work attitudes of Mexican Americans limit their contributions to organizational effectiveness.
DadeC. (2011). How Latinos are reshaping communities. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
2.
DavisJ. A.SmithT. W.MarsenP. V. (2011). General Social Surveys, 1972-2010: Cumulative codebook. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
3.
FreemanR. (1953). The Detroit area study: A training and research laboratory in the community. The American Journal of Sociology, 59, 30-33.
4.
GarciaA. M. (2002). The Mexican Americans. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
5.
GoodmanC. J.ManceS. M. (2011). Employment loss and the 2007-2009 recession: An overview. Monthly Labor Review, 134(4), 3-12.
6.
GreblerL.MooreJ. W.GuzmanR. C. (1970). The Mexican-American people: The nation’s second largest minority. New York, NY: Free Press.
7.
HellerC. S. (1966). Mexican American youth: Forgotten youth at the crossroads. New York, NY: Random House.
8.
KohutA.SuroR. (2006). American’s immigration quandary: No consensus on immigration problem and proposed fixes. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
9.
LenskiG. (1961). The religious factor. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
10.
MaslowA. H. (1943). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper.
11.
MasseyD. S.MagalyS. R. (2010). Broken boundaries: Creating immigrant identity in anti-immigrant times. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
12.
MotelS.PattenE. (2012). Changes in the characteristics of the Hispanic population, 2000 to 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
13.
OlmedoE. L.PadillaA. M. (1978). Empirical and construct validation of a measure acculturation for Mexican Americans. Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 179-187.
14.
SmithT. W. (1990). Ethnic images [GSS Topical Report 19]. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
15.
SmithT. W. (2001). Intergroup relations in a diverse America: Data from the 2000 General Social Survey. New York, NY: American Jewish Committee.
16.
Survey Research Center. (1960). Patterns of family change study. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
17.
TaylorP.Gonzalez-BarreraA.PasselJ.LopezM. H. (2012). An awakened giant: The Hispanic electorate is likely to double by 2030. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
18.
TellesE. E.OrtizO. (2008). Generations of exclusion: Mexican Americans, assimilation, and race. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1981). 1980 census of population, classified index of industries and occupations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990). 1990 census of population: Persons of Hispanic origin in the U. S. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
21.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993). We the Americans . . . Hispanics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
22.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Statistical abstracts of the United States: 2001 (121st ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
23.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2004). We the people: Hispanics in the United States—Census 2000 Special Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
24.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2012a). Current population survey: Annuals social and economic supplement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
25.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2012b). Statistical abstracts of the United States: 2012-2013 (131st ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
26.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2013). Mexican population. Profile America: Facts for Features. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
27.
ValdezB. (1963). Contrast between Spanish folk and Anglo urban cultural values. Denver, CO: Department of Institutions, Department of Social Welfare.
28.
WeaverC. N. (1968). A comparative study of the Mexican-American maintenance employees at the San Antonio Housing Authority. Business Studies,2, 1-4.
29.
WeaverC. N. (1969). A comparative study of the job performance of Spanish-surnamed police officers in San Antonio, Texas. Phylon, 30, 27-33.
30.
WeaverC. N. (1970). Accidents as a measure of the cultural adjustment of Mexican-Americans. The Sociological Quarterly, 11, 119-125.
31.
WeaverC. N. (1971). A comparison of the job performance of Mexican American and Anglo American employees with similar levels of education. California Journal of Educational Research, 22, 26-33.
32.
WeaverC. N. (2000). Work attitudes of Mexican Americans. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22, 275-295.
33.
WeaverC. N. (2008). Social distance as a measure of prejudice among ethnic groups in the United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 779-795.
34.
WeaverC. N. (2011). Hispanic prejudice in the United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2723-2738.
35.
WeaverC. N.GlennN. D. (1970a). Job performance comparisons: Mexican-Americans and Anglo employees. California Management Review, 13, 27-30.
36.
WeaverC. N.GlennN. D. (1970b). The job performance of Mexican-Americans. Sociology and Social Research, 54, 477-494.
