At the start of their term, the Obama administration pledged to reform two failing policy systems in the United States: immigration and health care. The Latino populations’ attitudes toward these two critical policy areas are particularly relevant due to the large foreign born population in the Latino community and the large number of Latinos who lack health insurance. Yet studies have not examined what factors shape Latino approval ratings and whether support for health and immigration reform affect Latino approval ratings of the current administration. We use the 2009 Latino Decisions survey and find that the foundations of Latino approval ratings are political in nature, with support for health and immigration policy reform driving support of the current administration. Given the vital role the Latino electorate played during the 2008 election, the success of these two policy reform efforts may have major implications for the 2012 elections.
BarretoM.NuñoS. (2011). The effectiveness of co-ethnic contact on Latino political recruitment. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 448-459.
4.
BarretoM.CollingwoodL.ManzanoS. (2010). Measuring Latino political influence in national elections. Political Research Quarterly, 63(4), 1-14.
5.
BarretoM.FragaL.ManzanoS.Martinez-EbersV.SeguraG. (2008). Should they dance with the one who brung ‘em? Latinos and the 2008 Presidential election. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41, 753-760.
6.
BlendonR. J.BensonJ. M. (2001). Americans’ views of the uninsured: An era for hybrid proposals. Health Affairs, 2, 33-46.
7.
BowlerS.NicholsonS. P.SeguraG. (2006). Earthquakes and aftershocks: Race, direct democracy, and partisan change. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 146-159.
8.
BrantonR. (2007). Latino attitudes toward various areas of public policy: The importance of acculturation. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 293-303.
9.
BrewerM. B.BrownR. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 554-594). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
10.
CainB. E.KiewietD. R.UhlanerC. (1991). The acquisition of partisanship by Latinos and Asian Americans. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 390-422.
11.
CohenR. A.MartinezM. E. (2009). Health insurance coverage: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2008. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm
12.
DavidsonR. H.ParkerG. R. (1972). Positive support for political institutions: The case of Congress. Western Political Quarterly, 25, 600-612.
13.
de la GarzaR. O.MenchacaM.DeSipioL. (1994). Barrio ballots: Latino politics in the 1990 elections. Boulder, CO: Westview.
14.
de la GarzaR. O.CortinaJ. (2007). Are Latinos republicans but just don’t know it? The Latino vote in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. American Politics Research, 35, 202-223.
15.
DeSipioL. (1996). Counting on the Latino vote: Latinos as a new electorate. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
16.
DeSipioL. (2009, March 19). Close the gate behind me? Latino policy preferences on immigration reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
17.
DruckmanJ.JacobsL. R.OstermeierE. (2004). Candidate strategies to prime issues and image. Journal of Politics, 66, 1180-1202.
18.
DruckmanJ.HolmesJ. (2004). Does presidential rhetoric matter? Priming and presidential approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34, 755-778.
19.
DurrR. H.GilmourJ. B.WolbrechtC. (1997). Explaining congressional approval. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 175-207.
20.
EdwardsG. (1995). Explaining presidential approval: The significance of issue salience. American Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 108-134.
21.
EdwardsG. (1990). Presidential approval. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
EdwardsG.MitchellW.WelchR. (1995). Explaining presidential approval: The significance of issue salience. American Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 108-134.
23.
FennoR., (1975). If, as Ralph Nader says, Congress is “the broken branch,” how come we love our congressmen so much? In OrnsteinN. J. (Ed.), Congress in change: Evolution and reform (pp. 277-287). New York, NY: Praeger.
GarciaJ. (2010). Latino public opinion: Identity politics and policy preferences. In NorranderB.WilcoxC. (Eds.), Understanding public opinion (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: SAGE.
27.
GelmanA.LeeD.GhitzaY. (2010). Public opinion on health care reform. Forum, 8(1), Article 8.
28.
HuddyL.FeldmanS.CapelosT.ProvostC. (2002). The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. Political Psychology, 23, 485-509.
29.
HuddyL. (2003). Group identity and political cohesion. In SearsD.HuddyL.JervisR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 511-558). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
HeroR. (2003). Racial/Ethnic Diversity and States’ Public Polices, Social Policies as Context for Welfare Policies. In SchramS.SossJ.FordingR. (Eds.), Race and the Politics of Welfare Reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
IyengarS.PetersM.KinderD. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review, 76, 848-858.
32.
IyengarS.KinderD. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American public opinion. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
33.
JacobsL.ShapiroR. (2000). Politicians don’t pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
KesslerD.BradyD. (2010). Putting the public’s money where its mouth is. Health Affairs, 28, 917-925.
35.
MonroeK. R. (1984). Presidential popularity and the economy. New York, NY: Praeger.
36.
OstromC. W.SimonD. M. (1985). Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity. American Political Science Review, 79, 334-358.
37.
OstromC. W.SimonD. M. (1989). The president’s public. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 1096-1111.
38.
PageB. I.ShapiroR. (1992). The rational public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
PachonH.BarretoM.MarquezF. (2004). Latino politics comes of age in the golden state. In de la GarzaR.DesipioL. (Eds.), Muted voices: Latinos and the 2000 elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
40.
PantojaA.SeguraG. (2003). Does ethnicity matter? Descriptive representation in the statehouse and political alienation among Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 441-460.
41.
ParkerG. R. (1981). Can congress ever be a popular institution? In CooperJ.MackenzieG. C. (Eds.), The house at work (pp. 31-55). Austin: University of Texas Press.
SanchezG. R. (2006). The role of group consciousness in Latino public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 435-446.
44.
SanchezG. R.GoodinA. S.RouseA. A.SantosR. (2008). The impact of ethnicity on attitudes toward health care reform in New Mexico (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Center for Health, Policy Working Paper Series). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.
45.
SanchezG. R.MedeirosJ. (2009). Latinos’ views on health care reform in the midst of the historic congressional debates of 2009 (Research Brief). Albuquerque: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Center for Health Policy at the University of New Mexico.
ThomasD. B.SigelmanL.BaasL. R. (1984). Public evaluations of the president: Policy, partisan, and personal determinants. Political Psychology, 5, 531-554.
48.
TolbertC. J.SteuernagelG. A. (2003). Race/ethnicity and referenda on redistributive health care policy. In SchramS.SossJ.FordingR. (Eds.), Race and the politics of welfare reform (pp. 279-297). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
49.
UhlanerC. (1996). Latinos and ethnic politics in California: Participation and preference. In Yáñez-ChávezA. (Ed.), Latino politics in California (pp. 33-72). La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California San Diego.
50.
UhlanerC.GarciaF. C. (1998). Foundations of Latino party identification: Learning, ethnicity and demographic factors among Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Cubans and Anglos in the United States (Paper 98-06). Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California.
51.
UhlanerC. J.GarciaF. C. (2002). Latino Public Opinion. In NorranderBarberaWilcoxClyde (Eds.), Understanding Public Opinion (pp. 77-102). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
52.
WongJ. S. (2000). The effects of age and political exposure on the development of party identification among Asian American and Latino immigrants in the United States. Political Behavior, 22, 341-371.
53.
WongJ. S. (2005, March 1). Political parties and immigrant mobilization. Paper presented at the Challenges of Participatory Democracy Workshop, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
