This study examined the psychometric properties of the Feminist Identity Development Scale (FIDS) and the Attitudes Toward Feminism and the Women’s Movement Scale (FWM) with 389 Mexican American 11th-grade and 12th-grade women. Results indicated internal consistency coefficients of .61, .62, .76, and .77 for the FIDS Passive Acceptance, Revelation, Embeddedness-Emanation, and Active Commitment subscales, respectively, and .67 for the FWM. Mexican American high school women scored significantly differently on the feminism scales when compared to samples from previously published studies. Results from factor analyses failed to support the previously published FIDS factor structure. A two-factor model of feminist attitudes was identified with the factors being labeled Feminist Orientation and Traditional Orientation. Implications for the assessment of feminist attitudes and feminist identity with Mexican American adolescent women are discussed.
Bargad, A., & Hyde, J. (1991). A study of feminist identity development in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 181-201.
2.
Beere, C. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
3.
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for Windows user’s guide: Version 5. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4.
Cash, T. F., Ancis, J. R., & Strachan, M. D. (1997). Gender attitudes, feminist identity, and body images among college women. Sex Roles, 36, 433-447.
5.
Cuellar, I., Arnold, B., & Maldonado, R. (1995). Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans: II. A revision of the original ARSMA Scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 17, 275-304.
6.
de Rios, M. D. (2001). Brief psychotherapy with the Latino immigrant client. New York: Haworth.
7.
DeVaney, S. B., & Hughey, A. W. (2000). Career development of ethnic minority students. In D. A. Luzzo (Ed.), Career counseling of college students: An empirical guide to strategies that work (pp. 233-252). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
Downing, N. E., & Roush, K. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 695-709.
9.
Enns, C. Z., & Hackett, G. (1990). Comparison of feminist and nonfeminist women’s reactions to variants of nonsexist and feminist counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 33-40.
10.
Falicov, C. J. (1998). Latino families in therapy: A guide to multicultural practice. New York: Guilford.
11.
Fassinger, R. E. (1994). Development and testing of the Attitudes Toward Feminism and the Women’s Movement (FWM) scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 389-402.
12.
Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A. (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development: Studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 15-29.
13.
Flores, L. Y., & O’Brien, K. M. (2002). The career development of Mexican American adolescent women: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 14-27.
14.
Fouad, N. A., Smith, P. L., & Enochs, L. (1997). Reliability and validity evidence for the Middle School Self-Efficacy Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 17-31.
15.
Fouad, N. A., & Spreda, S. L. (1996). Translation and use of a career-decision making self-efficacy assessment for Hispanic middle school students. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 21(4), 67-83.
16.
Galambos, N. L., Petersen, A. C., Richards, M., & Gitelson, I. B. (1985). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles, 13, 343-356.
17.
Gerstmann, E. A., & Kramer, D. A. (1997). Feminist identity development: Psychometric analyses of two feminist identity scales. Sex Roles, 36, 327-348.
18.
Ginorio, A. B., Gutierrez, L., Cauce, A. M., & Acosta, M. (1995). Psychological issues for Latinas. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp.241-263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
20.
Landrine, H. (1995). Introduction: Cultural diversity, contextualism, and feminist psychology. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-25). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
Lundberg, D. J., Osborne, W. L., & Miner, C. U. (1997). Career maturity and personality preferences of Mexican-American and Anglo-American adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 23, 203-213.
22.
McNeill, B. W., Prieto, L. R., Niemann, Y. F., Pizarro, M., Vera, E. M., & Gomez, S. P. (2001). Current directions in Chicana/o psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 5-17.
23.
Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002). Feminist identity development measures: Comparing the psychometrics of three instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 66-86.
24.
Moradi, B., Subich, L. M., & Phillips, J. C. (2002). Revisiting feminist identity development theory, research, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 6-43.
25.
Myaskovsky, L., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37, 861-883.
26.
Neimann, Y. F. (2001). Stereotypes about Chicanas and Chicanos: Implications for counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 55-90.
27.
O’Brien, K. M., & Fassinger, R. E. (1993). A causal model of the career orientation and career choice of adolescent women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 456-469.
28.
Rickard, K. M. (1989). The relationship of self-monitored dating behaviors to level of feminist identity on the Feminist Identity Scale. Sex Roles, 20, 213-226.
29.
Robitschek, C. (2003). Validity of personal growth initiative scale scores with a Mexican American college student population. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 496-502.
30.
Salgado de Snyder, V. N. (1999). Latina women: Constructing a new vision from within. Hispanic Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 21, 229-235.
31.
Smith, E. R., Ferree, M. M., & Miller, F. D. (1975). A short scale of attitudes toward feminism. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6, 51-56.
32.
Snyder, R., & Hasbrouck, L. (1996). Feminist identity, gender traits, and symptoms of disturbed eating among college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 593-598.
33.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66-67.
34.
Stephenson, M. (2000). Development and validation of the Stephenson Multigroup Acculturation Scale (SMAS). Psychological Assessment, 12, 77-88.
35.
Unger, R. (1995). Conclusion: Cultural diversity and the future of feminist psychology. In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 413-431). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
Vandiver, B. J. (2002). What do we know and where do we go?The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 96-104.
