The current literature review highlights the need for a two-dimensional rating system for Mexican American acculturation. It demonstrates increased attention to acculturation issues over time despite ongoing lack of the two-dimensional acculturation analysis. Although creators of the Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans–II (ARSMA-II) originally stated that the measure’s Mexican Orientation and Anglo Orientation subscales were orthogonal, they combined the two into a unidimensional acculturation score. A review of usage of the ARSMA-II from 1995 to 2013 revealed that 56% of studies collapsed the two subscales into a single acculturation score. Additional analysis revealed an increase in studies using the ARSMA-II across time, while showing that there was neither a difference in the usage of unidimensional and bidimensional scoring methods nor a shift in choosing scoring methods across time. We recommend that future studies use both the Mexican Orientation and the Anglo Orientation subscales to increase the accuracy of their acculturation research.
AndrewsA. R.BridgesA. J.GomezD. (2013). A multi-study analysis of conceptual and measurement issues related to health research on acculturation in Latinos. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 24, 134-143. doi:10.1177/1043659612472199
2.
BaumanS. B. (2005). The reliability and validity of the Brief Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II for children and adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 426-441. doi:10.1177/0739986305281423
3.
BroeschJ.HadleyC. (2012). Putting culture back into acculturation: Identifying and overcoming gaps in the definition and measurement of acculturation. The Social Science Journal, 49, 375-385. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2012.02.004
4.
ChirkovV. (2009). Critical psychology of acculturation: What do we study and how do we study it, when we investigate acculturation?International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 94-105. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.12.004
5.
CuéllarI.BastidaE.BraccioS. M. (2004). Residency in the United States, subjective well-being, and depression in an older Mexican-origin sample. Journal of Aging and Health, 16(4), 447-466.
6.
CuéllarI.HarrisL. C.JassoR. (1980). An acculturation scale for Mexican American normal and clinical populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2, 199-217.
7.
CuéllarI.MaldonadoR.ArnoldB. (1995). Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II: A revision of the original ARSMA scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17, 275-304. doi:10.1177/07399863950173001
8.
EddyJ.WilsonD.McClureH.MartinezC. (2011). Time in U.S. residency and the social, behavioral, and emotional adjustment of Latino immigrant families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33, 323-349. doi:10.1177/0739986311411281
9.
GormanB. K.Jen’nanG. R.KruegerP. M. (2010). Gender, acculturation, and health among Mexican Americans. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, 440-457. doi:10.1177/0022146510386792
10.
JadallaA.LeeJ. (2012). The relationship between acculturation and general health of Arab Americans. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 23, 159-165. doi:10.1177/1043659611434058
11.
KoneruV. K.Weisman de MamaniA. G.FlynnP. M.BetancourtH. (2007). Acculturation and mental health: Current findings and recommendations for future research. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 12, 76-96.doi: 10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.016
12.
LeeR.YoonE.Liu-TomH. (2006). Structure and measurement of acculturation/enculturation for Asian Americans using the ARSMA-II. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 39, 42-55.
13.
MarinG. (1992). Issues in the measurement of acculturation among Hispanics. In GeisingerK. F. (Ed.), Psychological Testing of Hispanics (pp. 235-251). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
PageR. (2007). Differences in health behaviors of Hispanic, White, and Black childbearing women: Focus on the Hispanic paradox. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 29, 300-312. doi:10.1177/0739986307304179
15.
RudminF. W. (2003). Critical history of the acculturation psychology of assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Review of General Psychology, 7, 3-37. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.3
16.
RudminF. W. (2009). Constructs, measurements and models of acculturation and acculturative stress. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 106-123.
17.
RyderA. G.AldenL. E.PaulhusD. L. (2000). Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 49-65. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.49
18.
SamD. L. (2006). Acculturation: Conceptual background and core components. In BerryJ. W.SamD. L. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 11-26). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
SamD. L.BerryJ. W. (2010). Acculturation: When individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds meet. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 472-481. doi:10.1177/1745691610373075
20.
SchwartzS. J.UngerJ. B.ZamboangaB. L.SzapocznikJ. (2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research. American Psychologist, 65, 237-251. doi:10.1037/a0019330
21.
TaylorV. L.HurleyE.RileyM. T. (1986). The influence of acculturation upon the adjustment of preschool Mexican-American children of single-parent families. Family Therapy, 13, 249-256.
22.
ThomsonM.Hoffman-GoetzL. (2009). Defining and measuring acculturation: A systematic review of public health studies with Hispanic populations in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 983-991.
VegaW.KolodyB.Aguilar-GaxiolaS.AldereteE.CatalanoR.Caraveo-AnduagaJ. (1998). Lifetime prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders among urban and rural Mexican Americans in California. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 771-778. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.55.9.771
25.
WallaceP. M.PomeryE. A.LatimerA. E.MartinezJ. L.SaloveyP. (2010). A review of acculturation measures and their utility in studies promoting Latino health. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32, 37-54. doi:10.1177/0739986309352341
