Studies of the economic well-being of women leaving welfare generally focus on the efforts of the welfare leaver herself. We argue that it is also important to take into account the employment and earnings of others in her household. Among women in Miami-Dade County (Florida) who left welfare between October 1999 and January 2000, our data show that households with multiple earners fared far better than others across several indicators of economic well-being. More detailed analysis indicates that the multiple-earner strategy was a likely option primarily for leavers whose sociodemographic characteristics already gave them labor market advantages. Important differences exist in welfare-leaving outcomes between Cuban and native-born African Americans, who together account for most of Miami’s welfare leavers.
Acle, A. (1999, December 3). Troubled welfare unit may be dissolved. Miami Herald, p. 1A, 24A.
2.
Allen, K., & Kirby, M. (2000). Unfinished business: Why cities matter to welfare reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved November 26, 2003, from www.brook.edu/es/urban/welfarecaseloads/wfrstdy.pdf
3.
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (2002). Summary of immigrant eligibility restrictions under current law as of October 15, 2003. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved November 26, 2003, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/immigration/restrictions-sum.htm
4.
Bavier, R. (2001). Welfare reform data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Monthly Labor Review, 124(7), 13-24.
5.
Beneckson, R. E. (2000, September). Successful welfare leavers in Florida: A study of racial and ethnic disparities in income levels and their relationship to the federal poverty level. Paper presented at the networking meeting of the Scholar-Practitioner Program of the W. K. Kellogg Devolution Initiative, University of Maryland at College Park. Retrieved November 26, 2003, from www.academy.umd.edu/scholarship/aali/spp2000networking/florida.htm
6.
Besharov, D. J. (2003). The past and future of welfare reform. Public Interest, 150, 4-21.
7.
Botsko, C., Snyder, K., & Leos-Urbel, J. (2001, July). Recent changes in Florida welfare and work, child care, and child welfare systems (the New Federalism National Survey of America’s Families State Update No. 2). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/FL_update.pdf
8.
Brush, L. D. (2001). Poverty, battering, race, and welfare reform: Black-White differences in women’s welfare-to-work transitions. Journal of Poverty, 5, 67-89.
9.
Burnham, L. (2001). Welfare reform, family hardship, and women of color. Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 577, 38-48.
10.
Burt, M. R. (2002). The “hard-to-serve”: Definitions and implications. In A. W. Weil & K. Finegold (Eds.), Welfare reform: The next act (pp. 163-178), Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
11.
Cancian, M. (2001). Rhetoric and reality of work-based welfare reform. Social Work, 46, 309-314.
12.
Cancian, M., Haveman, R., Kaplan, T., & Wolfe, B. (1999, January). Post-exit earnings and benefit receipt among those who left AFDC in Wisconsin (Institute for Research on Poverty Special Report No. 75). Madison: University of Wisconsin. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.ssc.wisc.edu/irp/sr/sr75.pdf
13.
Cancian, M., & Meyer, D. R. (2000, June). Work after welfare: Women’s work effort, occupation, and economic well-being. Social Work Research, 24, 69-86.
14.
Cheng, T. (2002). Welfare recipients: How do they become independent?Social Work Research, 26, 159-170.
15.
Cherlin, A. J., Bogen, K., Quane, J. M., & Burton, L. (2002, September). Operating within the rules: Welfare recipients’ experiences with sanctions and case closings. Social Service Review, 76, 387-405.
16.
Corcoran, M., Danziger, S. K., Kalil, A., & Seefeldt, K. S. (2000). How welfare reform is affecting women’s work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 241-269.
17.
Crew, R. E., & Eyerman, J. (1999). After WAGES: Results of the Florida study. Tallahassee: Florida State University. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/leavers99/state-rpts/fl/CrewLeaversStudy1999.pdf
18.
Danziger, S., Heflin, C. M., Corcoran, M. E., Oltmans, E., & Wang, H. (2002). Does it pay to move from welfare to work?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 671-692.
19.
Danziger, S. K., Corcoran, M., Danziger, S., Heflin, C., Kalil, A., Levine, J., et al. (2000). Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients. In R. Cherry & W. M. Rodgers III (Eds.), Prosperity for all? The economic boom and African Americans (pp. 245-278). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
Dunn, M., & Stepick, A. (1992). Blacks in Miami. In G. J. Grenier & A. Stepick III (Eds.), Miami now! Immigration, ethnicity, and social change (pp. 41-56). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
21.
Edin, K., & Harris, K. M. (1999). Getting off and staying off: Racial differences in the work route off welfare. In I. Brown (Ed.), Latinas and African American women at work (pp. 270-301). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
Fix, M., & Haskins, R. (2002). Welfare benefits for non-citizens (Welfare Reform and Benefits [WR&B] Policy Brief 15). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved November 27,2003, from www.brook.edu/es/research/projects/wrb/publications/pb/pb15.htm
23.
Fix, M., & Passel, J. S. (2002). The scope and impact of welfare reform’s immigrant provisions (Assessing the New Federalism Discussion Paper 02-03). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410412
24.
Fix, M. E., & Capps, R. (2002). Immigrant well-being in New York and Los Angeles (Immigrant Families and Workers: Facts and Perspectives Brief 1). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=310566
25.
Goldberg, C. (1999, May 2). Welfare’s missing in action. New York Times, p. 4-4.
26.
Gooden, S. T. (2000). Race and welfare: Examining employment outcomes of White and Black welfare recipients. Journal of Poverty, 4, 21-41.
27.
Harris, K. M. (1996). Life after welfare: Women, work, and repeat dependency. American Sociological Review, 61, 407-426.
28.
Hofferth, S. (2002, Spring). Did welfare reform work? Implications for 2002 and beyond. Contexts; Understanding People in Their Social Worlds, 1, 45-51.
29.
Holcomb, P. A., Flores, K., Pernas, M., Herbig, C., Tumlin, K. C., & Botsko, C. A. (1999, February). Income support and social services for low-income people in Florida (Assessing the New Federalism, State Report 308027). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=308027
30.
Jensen, L. (1988). Poverty and immigration in the United States: 1960-1980. In G. D. Sanfur & M. Tienda (Eds.), Divided opportunities: Minorities, poverty and social policy (pp. 117-137). New York: Plenum.
31.
Jensen, L. (1991). Secondary earner strategies and family poverty: Immigrant-native differentials, 1960-1980. Immigration and Migration Review, 25(1), 113-159.
32.
Johnson, R. C., & Corcoran, M. E. (2003). The road to self-sufficiency: Job quality and job transition patterns after welfare reform. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(4), 615-639.
33.
Kim, R. Y. (2000, December). Factors associated with employment status of parents receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Social Work Research, 24, 211-222.
34.
Kim, R. Y. (2001). Welfare reform and “ineligibles”: Issues of constitutionality and recent court rulings. Social Work, 46, 315-323.
35.
Lee, B. J., & Lewis, D. A. (2001, December). The importance of transitional benefits: Who loses Medicaid and food stamps, and what does it mean for staying off welfare? (Illinois Families Study, Policy Brief 1). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.northwestern.edu/ipr/research/transition.pdf
36.
Loprest, P. J. (1999). Families who left welfare: Who are they and how are they doing? (Assessing the New Federalism Report 99-02). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/discussion99-02.pdf
37.
Loprest, P. J. (2002). Who returns to welfare? (Assessing the New Federalism Report B-49). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/310548_B49.pdf
38.
Loprest, P. J. (2003a). Fewer welfare leavers employed in weak economy (Snapshots of America’s Families III Report 5). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27,2003, from www.urban.org/urlprint.cfm?ID=8550
39.
Loprest, P. J. (2003b). Disconnected welfare leavers face serious risks (Snapshots of America’s Families III Report 7). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=310839
40.
Lower-Basch, E. (2000). “Leavers” and diversion studies: Preliminary analysis of racial differences in caseload trends and leaver outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Human Services Policy. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/leavers99/race.htm
41.
Mauldin, M. D. (2002, September). Legislature improves welfare reform in Florida (Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability [OPPAGA] Progress Report 02-48). Tallahassee: Florida Legislature. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.oppaga.state.fl.us/reports/pdf/0248rpt.pdf
42.
Moffitt, R. (2002). From welfare to work: What the evidence shows (Policy Brief 13). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.brook.edu/printme.wbs?page=/es/research/projects/wrb/publications/pb/pb13.htm
43.
Moffitt, R., & Rolf, J. (2000, October). The diversity of welfare leavers (Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three-City Study, Background Paper to Policy Brief 00-02, Working Paper 00-01). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.jhu.edu/welfare/leav1a_all.pdf
44.
Moffitt, R., & Winder, K. (2003, January). The correlates and consequences of welfare exit and entry: Evidence from the Three-City Study (Welfare, Children and Families: A Three-City Study Working Paper 03-01). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.jhu.edu/welfare/WebPub.pdf
45.
Muschkin, C. G., & Sandoval, J. M. (1993, September). Secondary earner strategies among Mexican, Cuban, and Puerto Rican families in the United States. Paper presented at the PSID/LNPS Latino Data Conference at University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
46.
Neubeck, K. J., & Cazenave, N. A. (2001). Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America’s poor. New York: Routledge.
47.
Nightingale, D. S. (2002). Work opportunities for people leaving welfare. In A. Weil & K. Finegold (Eds.), Welfare reform: The next act (pp. 103-120). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
48.
Pérez, L. (1986). Immigrant economic adjustment and family organization: The Cuban success story reexamined. Immigration and Migration Review, 20(1), 4-20.
49.
Pérez-Stable, M., & Uriarte, M. (1993). Cubans and the changing economy of Miami. In R. Morales & F. Bonilla (Eds.), Latinos in a changing economy: Comparative perspectives on growing inequality (pp. 133-159). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
Portes, A. (1987, October). The social origins of the Cuban enclave economy of Miami. Sociological Perspectives, 30, 340-372.
51.
Portes, A., & Stepick, A. (1985). Unwelcome immigrants: The labor market experiences of 1980 (Mariel) Cuban and Haitian refugees in south Florida. American Sociological Review, 50, 493-514.
52.
Portes, A., & Stepick, A. (1993). City on the edge: The transformation of Miami. Los Angeles: University of Los Angeles Press.
53.
Quane, J., Rankin, B., & Jashi, P. (2002). Housing assistance, housing costs, and welfare reform (Welfare, Children and Families, A Three-City Study Policy Brief 02-4). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.jhu.edu/welfare/20012Brief_Jun02.pdf
54.
Queralt, M., Witte, A. D., & Griesinger, H. (2000). Changing policies, changing impacts: Employment and earnings of child-care subsidy recipients in the era of welfare reform. Social Service Review, 74, 588-619.
55.
Schram, S. F. (2002). Race and state welfare reform choices: A cause for concern. In G. Delgado (Ed.), From poverty to punishment: How welfare reform punishes the poor (pp. 89-107). Oakland, CA: Applied Research Center.
56.
Sherman, A., Amey, C., Duffield, B., Ebb, N., & Weinstein, D. (1998). Welfare to what: Early findings on family hardship and well-being. Washington, DC: Children’s Defense Fund and National Coalition for the Homeless. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.childrensdefense.org/pdf/wlfwhat.pdf
57.
Stagner, M., Kortenkamp, K, & Reardon-Anderson, J. (2002, September). Work, income, and well-being among long-term recipients: Findings from a survey of California’s “precarious” families (Assessing the New Federalism Discussion Paper 02-10). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/uploadedPDF/310559_DP02-10.pdf
58.
Stapulonis, R. A., Kovac, M. D., & Fraker, T. M. (1999, October). Surveying current and former TANF recipients in Iowa. Paper presented at the Twenty-First Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.mathematica-mpr.com/PDFs/surveying.pdf
59.
Stepick, A. (1992). The refugees nobody wants: Haitians in Miami. In G. J. Grenier & A. Stepick III (Eds.), Miami now! Immigration, ethnicity, and social change (pp. 57-82). Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
60.
Thomas-Breitfeld, S. (2002, September 10). Welfare reform 2002: Ensuring fair treatment and equal opportunity in TANF. Washington, DC: National Council of La Raza. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.nclr.org/policy/reports/fair_treatment.pdf
61.
Tienda, M., & Glass, J. (1985). Household structure and labor force participation of Black, Hispanic, and White mothers. Demography, 22, 381-394.
62.
Tienda, M., & Jensen, L. (1988). Poverty and minorities: A quarter-century profile of color and socioeconomic disadvantage. In G. D. Sanfur & M. Tienda (Eds.), Divided opportunities: Minorities, poverty, and social policy (pp. 23-62). New York: Plenum.
63.
Weil, A. (2002, May). Ten things everyone should know about welfare reform (New Federalism, Issues and Options for States, Series A, No. A-52). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/310484.pdf
64.
Weiss, C., & Bailar, B. A. (2002). High response rates for low-income population in-person surveys. In M. Ver Ploeg, R. A. Moffitt, & C. F. Citro (Eds.), Studies of welfare populations: Data collection and research issues (pp. 86-104). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
65.
Wood, R. G., & Rangarajan, A. (2003). What’s happening to TANF leavers who are not employed? (Issue Brief 6). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.mathematica-mpr.com/PDFs/tanfleave.pdf
66.
Yoo, J., & Slack, K. S. (2002, December). Putting food on the table after welfare reform: What protects families from food insecurity? (Illinois Families Study, Policy Brief 8). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.northwestern.edu/ipr/research/foodinsecurity.pdf
67.
Zedlweski, S. R. (2002). Family incomes: Rising, falling, or holding steady? In A. Weil & K. Finegold (Eds.), Welfare reform: The next act (pp. 53-77). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
68.
Zedlewski, S. R., Nelson, S., Edin, K., Koball, H. L., Pomper, K., & Roberts, T. (2003). Families coping without earnings or government cash assistance (Assessing the New Federalism Occasional Paper Number 64). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/uploadedPDF/410634_OP64.pdf
69.
Zimmermann, W., & Tumlin, K. C. (1999). Patchwork policies: State assistance for immigrants under welfare reform (Assessing the New Federalism Occasional Paper No. 24). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved November 27, 2003, from www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/occ24.pdf
