In this study, we argue that nonverbal racial/ethnic cues can activate one’s empathy toward disadvantaged out-groups, particularly when such cues resonate with one’s own in-group cultural experiences with discrimination. To explain this phenomenon, we propose Group Empathy Theory and test our expectations via a national survey experiment on undocumented immigration. We find trait-level group empathy is strongly linked with empathic reactions to vignettes depicting immigrant detainees in distress, which in turn affect immigration policy attitudes. We also find African Americans and Latinos are considerably more likely than Anglos to exhibit empathy for disadvantaged groups other than their own and oppose deportation policies aimed at undocumented immigrants.
AlsultanyE. A. (2006). From ambiguity to abjection: Iraqi-Americans negotiating race in the United States. In SalhiZ. S.NettonI. R. (Eds.), The Arab diaspora: Voices of an anguished scream (pp. 127-142). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
BatsonC. D.AhmadN. Y. (2009). Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3, 141-177.
5.
BatsonC. D.ChangJ.OrrR.RowlandJ. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656-1666.
6.
BatsonC. D.CokeJ. (1981). Empathy: A source of altruistic motivation for helping. In RushtonJ.SorrentinoR. (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 167-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
BowersJ. (2011). Making effects manifest in randomized experiments. In DruckmanJ. N.GreenD. P.KuklinskiJ. H.LupiaA. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 459-480). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BraderT.ValentinoN. A.RyanT. J.JardinaA. E. (2010, September). The racial divide on immigration opinion: Why African Americans are less threatened by immigrants. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
10.
BrantonR.CasseseE. C.JonesB. S.WesterlandC. (2011). All along the watchtower: Acculturation fear, anti-Latino affect, and immigration. Journal of Politics, 73, 664-679.
11.
BuieD. H. (1981). Empathy: Its nature and limitations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 29, 281-307.
12.
CallegaroM.DiSograC. (2008). Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 1008-1032.
13.
CaoX. (2010). Pathways to eliciting aid: The effects of visual representations of human suffering on empathy and help for people in need. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
14.
ChangL.KrosnickJ. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the Internet comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 641-678.
15.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85-102.
16.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
17.
DavisM. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18.
de la GarzaR. O.FalconA.GarciaF. C. (1996). Will the real Americans please stand up: Anglo and Mexican-American support of core American political values. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 335-351.
19.
DuanC.HillC. E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 261-274.
20.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In EisenbergN.DamonW. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional and personality development (pp. 701-778). New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2010). Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 627-660.
22.
HoffmanM. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In IzardC. E.KaganJ.ZajoncR. B. (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 103-131). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
KinderD. R.SandersL. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
MasuokaN.JunnJ. (2013). The politics of belonging: Race, public opinion, and immigration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
O’BrienE.KonrathS. H.GrühnD.HagenA. L. (2012). Empathic concern and perspective taking: Linear and quadratic effects of age across the adult life span. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 168-175.
28.
PeffleyM.HurwitzJ. (2010). Justice in America: The separate realities of blacks and whites. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PulosS.ElisonJ.LennonR. (2004). Hierarchical structure of the interpersonal reactivity index. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 355-360.
30.
RichardsonD. R.HammockG. S.SmithS. M.GardnerW.SignoM. (1994). Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 275-289.
31.
RogersC. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184-256). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
32.
RumbleA. C.Van LangeP. A. M.ParksC. D. (2010). The benefits of empathy: When empathy may sustain cooperation in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 856-866.
33.
SawyerF. H. (1975). A conceptual analysis of empathy. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3, 37-47.
SchumanH.SteehC.BoboL.KrysanM. (1997). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
ScotlandE. (1969). Exploratory studies of empathy. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 271-314). New York, NY: Academic Press.
37.
SidesJ.GrossK. (2013). Stereotypes of Muslims and support for the War on Terror. Journal of Politics, 75, 583-598.
38.
SirinC. V.ValentinoN. A.VillalobosJ. D. (2016). Group Empathy Theory: The effect of group empathy on U.S. intergroup attitudes and behavior in the context of immigration threats. Journal of Politics, 78, 893-908.
SommersS. R.ApfelbaumE. P.DukesK. N.ToosiN.WangE. J. (2006). Race and media coverage of Hurricane Katrina: Analysis, implications, and future research questions. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 39-55.
41.
StephanW. G.FinlayK. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729-743.
42.
TruaxC. B.CarkhuffR. R. (1967). Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy: Training and practice. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
43.
VillalobosJ. D. (2011). Promises and human rights: The Obama Administration on immigrant detention policy reform. Race, Gender & Class, 18, 151-170.
WilhelmM. O.BekkersR. (2010). Helping behavior, dispositional empathic concern, and the principle of care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 11-32.
46.
ZillmannD. (2006). Empathy: Affective reactivity to other’s emotional experiences. In BryantJ.VordererP. (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 151-182). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
