Evaluation is a powerful tool for improvement yet is often perceived as simply a rearview mirror into the past. A two-tier qualitative method was used to uncover the practice and understanding of evaluation among youth pastors in Illinois. Reliance on indicators, such as stories and observation, tended to reinforce assumptions in practice. Evaluation was pervasive, powerfully guided perception, and primarily implicit.
LeeM. R. (2003). Korean evangelical parachurch leaders (Doctoral dissertation). Trinity International University.
21.
LinhartT. D. (2005). Planting seeds: The curricular hope of short-term mission experiences in youth ministry.Christian Education Journal, Series 3, 2(2), 256–272.
PlueddemannJ. (1981). Curriculum improvement through evaluation.Christian Education Journal, 8(1), 55–60.
36.
RobbinsD. (1990). Youth ministry nuts and bolts: Mastering the ministry behind the scenes.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
37.
RoenW. (1989). The inward ear: A sermon evaluation method for preachers and hearers of the Word.Washington DC: Alban.
38.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.New York, NY: Basic Books.
39.
SchönD. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
SengeP. M. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education.New York, NY: Doubleday
41.
SetranD., & RamlerN. (2012). Re-imagining Frankena: Toward a holistic model for philosophy of ministry.Christian Education Journal, 9(1), 7–26.
42.
SevereM. (2006). The Pac-man syndrome: The missing congruence of philosophy and practice in youth ministry.The Journal of Youth Ministry, 4(2), 75–104.
43.
SevereM. (2010). Epistemological assumptions in evaluation: The intersection between philosophy and practice in youth ministry.Christian Education Journal, 7(1), 6–29.
44.
ShavelsonR. J., McDonnellL., & OakesJ. (1991). What are educational indicators and indicator systems?Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2(11) Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=11.
45.
ShavelsonR. J., Ruiz-PrimoM. A., & WileyE. W. (2005). Windows into the mind.Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 49(4), 413–430.
46.
ShimamuraA. P. (2000). Toward a cognitive neuroscience of metacognition.Consciousness and Cognition, 9(1) 313–323.
47.
SmithM. (2001). Chris Argyris: Theories of action, double-loop learning and organizational learning.The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. Retrieved from www.infed.org/thinkers/argyris.htm.
48.
StrommenM. (1968). Evaluation and Christian growth.Review and Expositor, 65(2), 195–207.
49.
StrommenM., JonesK., & RahnD. (2001). Youth ministry that transforms: A comprehensive analysis of the hopes, frustrations, and effectiveness of today's youth workers.Grand Rapids, MI: Youth Specialties/Zondervan.
50.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WengerE., & SnyderW. (1998). Are you ready for communities of practice?Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.
52.
WestingH. (1984). Evaluate and grow.Wheaton, IL: Victor.
53.
WigginsG., & McTigheJ. (1998). Understanding by design.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
54.
ZoharA. (2006). The nature and development of teachers’ metastrategic knowledge in the context of teaching higher order thinking.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 331–377.