The COVID-19 pandemic generated tremendous journalistic attention, and occurred during a period of increasing politicization and polarization in America’s news media. This study considers the intersection of both phenomena, and the extent of politicization in recent and historical pandemic-related reporting. Results suggest that political topics, actions and actors have frequently been the focus of COVID-19-related reporting, and that such political content has grown more substantial over time.
AntillaL. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338–352.
4.
ArceneauxK.JohnsonM. (2015). More a symptom than a cause: Polarization and Partisan News media in America. In ThurberJ.YoshinakaA. (Eds.), American gridlock: The sources, character, and impact of political polarization (pp. 309–336). Cambridge University Press.
5.
BakerJ. P. (2008). Mercury, vaccines, and autism: One controversy, three histories. American Journal of Public Health, 98(2), 244–253.
6.
BarryC. L.BrescollV. L.BrownellK. D.SchlesingerM. (2009). Obesity metaphors: How beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 7–47.
7.
BauerM.GaskellG. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(2), 163–186.
8.
BennettJ. T.DiLorenzoT. J. (2000). From pathology to politics: Public health in America. Transaction Publishers.
9.
BerelsonB. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. The Free Press.
10.
BerryT. R.Wharf-HigginsJ.NaylorP. J. (2007). SARS wars: An examination of the quantity and construction of health information in the news media. Health Communication, 21(1), 35–44.
11.
BolsenT.DruckmanJ. N.CookF. L. (2014). How frames can undermine support for scientific adaptations: Politicization and the status-quo bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 1–26.
12.
BoykoffM. T.BoykoffJ. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125–136.
13.
BoykoffM. T.BoykoffJ. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190–1204.
14.
BoykoffM. T.RajanR. (2007). Signals and noise: Mass-media coverage of climate change in the USA and the UK. EMBO Reports, 8(3), 207–211.
15.
BriggsC. L.HallinD. C. (2010). Health reporting as political reporting: Biocommunicability and the public sphere. Journalism, 11(2), 149–165.
16.
Brown-DeanK. L. (2019). Identity politics in the United States. John Wiley.
17.
CallaghanK.SchnellF. (2001). Assessing the democratic debate: How the news media frame elite policy discourse. Political Communication, 18(2), 183–213.
18.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
19.
CarlsonM. (2017). Journalistic authority. Columbia University Press.
20.
CarlsonM. (2018). The information politics of journalism in a post-truth age. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1879–1888.
21.
CarlsonM. (2020). What do we do when journalism stops working?Political Communication, 37(4), 582–584.
22.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1986). On the structure and sequence of issue evolution. American Political Science Review, 80(3), 901–920.
23.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton University Press.
24.
CarminesE. G.WagnerM. W. (2006). Political issues and party alignments: Assessing the issue evolution perspective. Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), 67–81.
ChinnS.HartP. S.SorokaS. (2020). Politicization and polarization in climate change news content, 1985-2017. Science Communication, 42(1), 112–129.
27.
ChoiM.McKeeverB. W. (2019). News framing of avian flu: Media advocacy and response to a public health crisis. Newspaper Research Journal, 40(4), 451–466.
28.
CiagliaA.MazzoniM. (2015). The politicization of entertainment media: A study of the Italian tabloid Chi during the 2013 electoral campaign. Journalism, 16(6), 812–829.
29.
Connolly-AhernC.AhernL. A.BortreeD. S. (2009). The effectiveness of stratified constructed week sampling for content analysis of electronic news source archives: AP Newswire, Business Wire, and PR Newswire. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 862–883.
30.
CrossS. (2014). Mad and bad media: Populism and pathology in the British tabloids. European Journal of Communication, 29(2), 204–217.
31.
DorfmanL.WallackL.WoodruffK. (2005). More than a message: Framing public health advocacy to change corporate practices. Health Education & Behavior, 32(3), 320–336.
32.
DudoA. D.DahlstromM. F.BrossardD. (2007). Reporting a potential pandemic: A risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in U.S. newspapers. Science Communication, 28(4), 429–454.
33.
DunlapR. E.McCrightA. M.YaroshJ. H. (2016). The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment. Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58(5), 4–23.
34.
DunwoodyS.GriffinR. (1999). Structural pluralism and media accounts of risk. In DemersD.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Mass media, social control and social change, a macrosocial perspective (pp. 139–158). Iowa State University Press.
35.
Dutta-BergmanM. J. (2004). Primary sources of health information: Comparisons in the domain of health attitudes, health cognitions, and health behaviors. Health Communication, 16(3), 273–288.
36.
Dutta-BergmanM. J. (2005). Theory and practice in health communication campaigns: A critical interrogation. Health Communication, 18(2), 103–122.
37.
EntmanR. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27.
38.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
39.
FeldmanL.HartP. S.MilosevicT. (2015). Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading US newspapers’ coverage of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 481–497.
40.
FidlerD. P. (2001). The return of “microbialpolitik.”Foreign Policy, 122, 80–81.
41.
FisherD. R.WaggleJ.LeifeldP. (2013). Where does political polarization come from? Locating polarization within the U.S. climate change debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 70–92.
42.
FogartyA. S.HollandK.ImisonM.BloodR. W.ChapmanS.HoldingS. (2011). Communicating uncertainty: How Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 181–189.
43.
FowlerE. F.GollustS. E.DempseyA. F.LantzP. M.UbelP. A. (2012). Issue emergence, evolution of controversy, and implications for competitive framing: The case of the HPV vaccine. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(2), 169–189.
GarlarceE. M.RamandhanS.ViswanathK. (2011). Health information seeking. In ThompsonT. L.ParrottR.NussbaumJ. F. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (pp. 167–180). Routledge.
47.
GerbnerG. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication and Society, 1(3–4), 175–194.
48.
GerbnerG.GrossL. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199.
49.
GolanG. (2006). Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage: Assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 323–333.
GranelloD. H.PauleyP. S. (2000). Television viewing habits and their relationship to tolerance toward people with mental illness. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22(2), 162–174.
52.
GuessA. M.BarberáP.MunzertS.YangJ. (2021). The consequences of online partisan media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14), 1–8.
53.
HallinD. C.BriggsM.BrandtC. L. (2010, June22–26). Health and the public sphere: The politicization of health reporting, 1960S-2000s. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Singapore.
54.
HartP. S.ChinnS.SorokaS. (2020). Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42(5), 679–697.
55.
HartleyJ. (1992). Impartiality. In O’SullivanT.HartleyJ.SaundersD.MontgomeryM.FiskeJ. (Eds.), Key concepts in communication and cultural studies (pp. 144–145). Routledge.
56.
HartzJ.ChappelR. (1997). Worlds apart—How the distance between science and journalism threatens America’s future. First Amendment Center.
57.
HellmuellerL.VosT. P.PoepselM. A. (2013). Shifting journalistic capital? Transparency and objectivity in the twenty-first century. Journalism Studies, 14(3), 287–304.
58.
HeltzelG.LaurinK. (2020). Polarization in America: Two possible futures. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 179–184.
59.
HetheringtonM. J.RoushC. E. (2013, April). Perceiving the other side: Toward a new understanding of mass polarization [Paper presentation]. The Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, United States.
60.
HetheringtonM. J.RudolphT. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. The University of Chicago Press.
61.
HilesS. S.HinnantA. (2014). Climate change in the newsroom: Journalists’ evolving standards of objectivity when covering global warming. Science Communication, 36(4), 448–463.
62.
HiltonS.HuntK. (2010). UK newspapers’ representations of the 2009–10 outbreak of swine flu: One health scare not over-hyped by the media?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(1), 941–946.
63.
InfanteD. A.RancerA. S.WomackD. F. (1997). Building communication theory (3rd ed.). Waveland.
64.
JenkinsJ. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 527–553.
65.
JohnsonJ. D. (1997). Cancer-related information-seeking. Hampton.
66.
JotterandF. (2006). The politicization of science and technology: Its implications for nanotechnology. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(4), 658–665.
67.
Kaiser Health. (2004). Health care priorities. Kaiser Family Foundation.
68.
KimS. H.ScheufeleD. A.ShanahanJ. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 7–25.
69.
KlemmC.DasE.HartmannT. (2016). Swine flu and hype: A systematic review of media dramatization of the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Journal of Risk Research, 19(1), 1–20.
70.
KlemmC.DasE.HartmannT. (2019). Changed priorities ahead: Journalists’ shifting role perceptions when covering public health crises. Journalism, 20(9), 1223–1241.
71.
KrippendorffK. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed). SAGE.
LawrenceR. G. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 17(2), 93–114.
74.
LawrenceR. G. (2004). Framing obesity: The evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(3), 56–75.
75.
LeeY.ParkS. A.LeeH.WillisE.CameronG. T. (2019). Resources aren’t everything, but they do help: Assessing local TV health news to deliver substantive and useful health information. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 12(1), 13–22.
76.
LemkeJ. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex.
77.
LindamanK.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2002). Issue evolution, political parties, and the culture wars. Political Research Quarterly, 55(1), 91–110.
MacPhailT. (2009). The politics of bird flu: The battle over viral samples and China’s role in global public health. Journal of Language and Politics, 8(3), 456–475.
80.
MarlengaB.BergR. L.GallagherS. S. (2017). News reports and their role in child agricultural injury prevention. Journal of Agromedicine, 22(2), 71–77.
81.
McCombsM. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Policy Press.
82.
McCombsM. E.GhanemS. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In ReeseR. S.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum.
83.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
84.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499–522.
85.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194.
86.
McHughM. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
87.
McKernsJ. P. (1976). The history of American journalism: A bibliographical essay. American Studies International, 15(1), 17–34.
88.
McManusJ. H. (1992). What kind of commodity is news?Communication Research, 19(6), 787–805.
89.
MillerM. M.RiechertB. P. (2001). The spiral of opportunity and frame resonance: Mapping the issue cycle in news and public discourse. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 107–121). Routledge.
90.
MindichD. T. Z. (1998). Just the facts: How “objectivity” came to define American journalism. New York University Press.
91.
MottF. L. (1962). American journalism: A history, 1690-1960. Macmillan.
92.
NeuendorfK. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE.
93.
NiederdeppeJ.HornikR. C.KellyB. J.FroschD. L.RomantanA.StevensR. S.BargF. K.WeinerJ. L.SchwartzJ. S. (2007). Examining the dimensions of cancer related information seeking and scanning behavior. Health Communication, 22(2), 153–167.
94.
NordenstrengK. (1995). The journalist: A walking paradox. In LeeP. (Ed.), The democratization of communication (pp. 114–129). University of Wales Press.
95.
OreskesN.ConwayE. M.ShindellM. (2008). From chicken little to Dr. Pangloss: William Nierenberg, global warming, and the social deconstruction of scientific knowledge. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 38(1), 109–152.
PollardJ. E. (1947). The presidents and the press. Macmillan.
100.
RaeijmaekersD.MaeseeleP. (2017). In objectivity we trust? Pluralism, consensus, and ideology in journalism studies. Journalism, 18(6), 647–663.
101.
RainsS. A. (2007). Perceptions of traditional information sources and use of the world wide web to seek health information: Findings from the health information national trends survey. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 667–680.
102.
RiffeD.AustC. F.LacyS. R. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 133–139.
SchlessingerA. M. (1958). Prelude to independence: The newspaper war on Britain, 1764-1776. Knopf.
105.
SchudsonM. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149–170.
106.
SchwitzerG. (2004). A statement of principles for health care journalists. The American Journal of Bioethics, 4(4), 9–13.
107.
SchwitzerG.MudurG.HenryD.WilsonA.GooznerM.SimbraM.SweetM.BaverstockK. A. (2005). What are the roles and responsibilities of the media in disseminating health information?PLOS Medicine, 2(7), 576–582.
108.
ShuchmanM.WilkesM. S. (1997). Medical scientists and health news reporting: A case of miscommunications. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(12), 976–982.
109.
SkovsgaardM.AlbækE.BroP.de VreeseC. (2013). A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism, 14(1), 22–42.
110.
SlopenN. B.WatsonA. C.GraciaG.CorriganP. W. (2007). Age analysis of newspaper coverage of mental illness. Journal of Health Communication, 12(1), 3–15.
111.
SlothuusR.de VreeseC. H. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630–645.
112.
SoontjensK.Van ErkelP. F. (2022). Finding perceptions of partisan news media bias in an unlikely place. The International Journal of Press/politics, 27(1), 120–137.
113.
SpeedE.MannionR. (2017). The rise of post-truth populism in pluralist liberal democracies: Challenges for health policy. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(5), 249–251.
114.
SpeersT.LewisJ. (2004). Journalists and jabs: Media coverage of the MMR vaccine. Communication and Medicine, 1(2), 171–181.
115.
SpencerE. A.RealK.CrossA. (2019). Health care coverage is the toughest beat to cover: A multi-method analysis of rural newspaper coverage of county health rankings. Kentucky Journal of Communication, 38(1), 4–27.
116.
StrykerJ. (2003). Articles media and marijuana: A longitudinal analysis of news media effects on adolescents’ marijuana use and related outcomes, 1977–1999. Journal of Health Communication, 8(4), 305–328.
117.
SundbladE. L.BielA.GärlingT. (2009). Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons. Environment and Behavior, 41(2), 281–302.
118.
ThomasR. J.TandocE. C.HinnantA. (2017). False balance in public health reporting? Michele Bachmann, the HPV vaccine, and “mental retardation.”Health Communication, 32(2), 152–160.
119.
UngarS. (2008). Global bird flu communication: Hot crisis and media reassurance. Science Communication, 29(4), 472–497.
120.
VastermanP. L.RuigrokN. (2013). Pandemic alarm in the Dutch media: Media coverage of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic and the role of the expert sources. European Journal of Communication, 28(4), 436–453.
121.
WagnerW.KronbergerN.SeifertF. (2002). Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledge, images and public discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 323–343.
122.
WaisbordS. (2018). Truth is what happens to news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866–1878.
123.
WallingtonS. F.BlakeK.Taylor-ClarkK.ViswanathK. (2010). Antecedents to agenda setting and framing in health news: An examination of priority, angle, source, and resource usage from a national survey of US health reporters and editors. Journal of Health Communication, 15(1), 76–94.
124.
WangZ.GantzW. (2010). Health content in local television news: A current appraisal. Health Communication, 25(3), 230–237.
125.
WaplesD.BerelsonB.BradshawF. R. (1940). What reading does to people: A summary of evidence on the social effects of reading and a statement of problems for research. The University of Chicago Press.
126.
WasherP. (2004). Representations of SARS in the British newspapers. Social Science and Medicine, 59(12), 2561–2571.
127.
WinettL. B.LawrenceR. G. (2005). The rest of the story: Public health, the news, and the 2001 anthrax attacks. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(3), 3–25.
128.
YangJ.RojasH.WojcieszakM.AalbergT.CoenS.CurranJ.HayashiK.IyengarS.JonesP. K.MazzoleniG.PapathanassopoulosS.RheeJ.RoweD.SorokaS.TiffenR. (2016). Why are “others” so polarized? Perceived political polarization and media use in 10 countries. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 349–367.
129.
YusufI.YahayaS.QabliS. (2015). Role of media in portraying Ebola in and outside Africa. Journal of Tropical Diseases & Public Health, 3(1), 152.
130.
ZhangX.BieB.BillingsA. C. (2017). Newspaper Ebola articles differ from Twitter updates. Newspaper Research Journal, 38(4), 497–511.
131.
ZhangY.JinY.StewartS.PorterJ. (2016). Framing responsibility for depression: How US news media attribute causal and problem-solving responsibilities when covering a major public health problem. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44(2), 118–135.
132.
ZingherJ.FlynnM. (2018). From on high: The effect of elite polarization on mass attitudes and behaviors, 1972–2012. British Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 23–45.
