The New York Times “streamlined” its editing process in 2017 and reduced the editing staff by nearly half. Through content analysis on corrections (N = 1,149), this research examines the effects of these cuts. Analysis revealed the Times published more corrections before the changes, but that corrections appeared more quickly after the original error occurred and there were more corrections for content in the A section following the staffing cuts. The A section includes national and international news and thus often contains political content, which is rife for heightened scrutiny in an age of media distrust. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.
AppelmanA.HettingaK. E. (2019). Error message: Creation of a revised codebook for analysis of newspaper corrections. Newspaper Research Journal, 40(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532918814452
DelucchiK. L. (1993). On the use and misuse of chi-square. In KerenG.LewisC. (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Statistical issues (pp. 295–320). Lawrence Erlbaum.
EgelhoferJ. L.LechelerS. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
15.
HeimK.CraftS. (2020). Transparency in journalism: Meanings, merits, and risks. In WilkinsL.ChristiansC. G. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of mass media ethics (2nd ed., pp. 308–320). Routledge.
16.
HettingaK. (2011). Cultivating accountability through the use of corrections in online newspapers [Doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University.
17.
HettingaK.AppelmanA.OtmarC.PosadaA.ThompsonA. (2018). Comparing and contrasting corrected errors at four newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(2), 155–168.
18.
HettingaK. E. (2013). Experiencing error: How journalists describe what it’s like when the press fails. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2012.746529
19.
HettingaK. E.AppelmanA. (2014). Corrections of newspaper errors have little impact. Newspaper Research Journal, 35(1), 51–63.
20.
KarlssonM.ClerwellC.NordL. (2014). You AIN’T seen nothing yet. Transparency’s (lack of) effect on source and message credibility. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 668–678.
21.
LacyS.RiffeD. (1996). Sampling error and selecting intercoder reliability samples for nominal content categories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300414
MartinJ. D.MartinsR. J. (2018). Outsourced credibility? A quasi-experimental study of corrections at newspapers pre- and post-outsourcing of copy editing. Journalism Studies, 19(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1178594
SiegalA. M.ConnollyW. G. (1999). The New York Times manual of style and usage: The official style guide used by the writers and editors of the world’s most authoritative newspaper. Three Rivers Press.
37.
SilvermanC. (2007). Regret the error: How media mistakes pollute the press and imperil free speech. Sterling Publishing.
