Applying person perception theory, this research uses quantitative content analysis to analyze 1,183 newspaper photographs of the two leading candidates from the 2016 presidential election. Study findings show that there were statistically significant differences in the photographic presentations of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the 2016 election, with Clinton pictured more favorably than Trump.
BichardS. L. (2006). Building blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis of the distribution of frames on the 2004 presidential candidate web sites. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300207
CloreG. L.WigginsN. H.ItkinS. (1975). Gain and loss in attraction: Attributions from nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 706–712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.31.4.706
ColemanR.BanningS. (2006). Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 313–328.
EwbankM. P.BarnardP. J.CroucherC. J.RamponiC.CalderA. J. (2009). The amygdala response to images with impact. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(2), 127–133.
GriffinM. (2001). Camera as witness, image as sign: The study of visual communication in communication research. Communication Yearbook, 24, 433–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2001.11678997
KingC.LesterP. M. (2005). Photographic coverage during the Persian Gulf and Iraqi wars in three US newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(3), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200309
20.
KrippendorffK. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE.
MillerA.RobertsS. (2010). Visual agenda-setting & proximity after Hurricane Katrina: A study of those closest to the event. Visual Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 31–46.
24.
MoriartyS. E.GarramoneG. M. (1986). A study of newsmagazine photographs of the 1984 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 63(4), 728–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908606300408
25.
MoriartyS. E.PopovichM. N. (1991). Newsmagazine visuals and the 1988 presidential election. Journalism Quarterly, 68(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909106800307
PfauM.HaighM.FifrickA.HollD.TedescoA.CopeJ.NunnallyD.SchiessA.PrestonD.RoszkowskiP.MartinM. (2006). The effects of print news photographs of the casualties of war. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300110
SchillD. (2012). The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication, 12(2), 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2011.653504
35.
SchneiderD. J.HastorfA. H.EllsworthP. (1979). Person perception. Random House.
36.
TaylorS. E.FiskeS. T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(3), 439–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0077095
WaldmanP.DevittJ. (1998). Newspaper photographs and the 1996 presidential election: The question of bias. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500206
40.
WatermanR. W.WrightR.St ClairG. (1999). The image-is-everything presidency: Dilemmas in American leadership. Westview Press.
