An experiment was conducted to determine whether perceptions of the newspaper and story differed by byline type. The findings not only indicate few participants know a story is native advertising, they rarely know the writer except a staff writer. Thus, perceptions mainly differed little. Other bylines were not detailed enough for readers to fully know the writer’s identity, and few read to the tagline. Stronger measures were recommended to fully inform readers about the writer.
AhmedR.YoonD.KimS.RonyN. (2017, March). Are native ads on online news media effective? Examining advertising’s dual mediation hypothesis in contexts of native ads[Paper presentation]. Competitively selected paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising, Boston, MA, United States.
3.
AmazeenM. A.MuddimanA. R. (2017). Saving media or trading on trust? The effects of Native advertising on audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers. Digital Journalism, 6, 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1293488
4.
AmazeenM.A.WojdynskiB. A. (2018). The effects of disclosure format on native advertising recognition and audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers. Journalism, 1–20. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464884918754829
5.
CampbellR.MartinC. R.FabosB. (2017). Media & culture: Mass communication in the digital age. Bedford/St. Martins.
6.
DorD. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 695–721.
7.
EckerU. K.LewandowskyS.ChangE. P.PillaiR. (2014). The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(4), 323–335.
8.
ElkinT. (2017, May12). More than 90% of publishers saw native ad revenue increase in Q1: More than half of publishers don’t believe that Google and Facebook “own” the digital advertising market. https://nativeadvertisinginstitute.com/blog/native-ad-revenue/
HolmqvistK.HolsanovaJ.BarthelsonM.LundqvistD. (2003). Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. In RadachR.HyonaJ.DeubelH. (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp, 657–670). Amsterdam: North Holland.
13.
IversenM. H.KnudsenE. (2019). When politicians go native: The consequences of political native advertising for citizens’ trust in news. Journalism, 20(7), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916688289
14.
JohnsonM.GoidelK.ClimekM. (2014). The decline of daily newspapers and the third-person effect. Social Science Quarterly, 95(5), 1245–1258.
15.
KimS. J.HancockJ. T. (2016). How advertorials deactivate advertising schema: MTurk-based experiments to examine persuasion tactics and outcomes in health advertisements. Communication Research, 44(7), 1019–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644017
16.
LiY.WangY. (2019). Brand disclosure and source partiality affect native advertising recognition and media credibility. Newspaper Research Journal, 40(3), 299–316.
NewmanN.FletcherR.LevyD. A. L.NielsenR. K. (2016). Digital news report 2016. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/
19.
StewartT. (2019, June18). Gaining on pain: Scientists break new ground with old techniques to find answers to arthritis. The Oklahoman, A8.
20.
WestleyB. H. (1989). The controlled experiment. In StempelG. H.IIIWestleyB. H. (Eds.), Research methods in mass communication (pp. 200–246). Prentice-Hall.
21.
WojdynskiB. W. (2016). The deceptiveness of sponsored news articles: How readers recognize and perceive native advertising. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(12), 1475–1491.
22.
WojdynskiB. W.EvansN. J. (2016). Going native: Effects of disclosure position and Language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 157–168.
