The study analyzes professional disagreements over the value of `prepared' letters to the editor, or pre-written letters that supporters of advocacy campaigns can sign and submit to newspapers as their own opinions. Journalists derisively call such letters `astroturf' and disdain the `fake grass-roots' nature of such letters; advocates suggest such `sample letters' help more people to get involved in public discourse. Through an open-ended textual analysis of texts from both camps, the author finds a rhetorical struggle between the two groups that forms a hegemonic concordance through which letters-to-the-editor forums are seen more as battlefields to be defended or conquered than as sites for consensus-seeking debate, which in the end feeds or reflects the hostile and monopolistic nature of modern public discourse.
Barthes, R. (1977) `The Death of the Author', in R. Barthes Image, Music, Text, trans. Stephen Heath, pp. 142-8. New York: Hill and Wang.
2.
Benjamin, W. (2001[1969]) `The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction', in G. M. Durham and D. M. Kellner (eds) Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks, pp. 48-70. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
3.
Blumenstyk, G. (2005) `For-Profit Education Companies Brace Themselves for "60 Minutes" Exposé', The Chronicle of HigherEducat ion, 4 February, URL (consulted May 2008): http://chronicle.com/weekly/v51/i22/22a02801.htm
4.
Bodensteiner, C.A. (1997) `Special Interest Group Coalitions: Ethical Standards for Broad-Based Support Efforts', Public Relations Review23(1): 31-46.
5.
Bresee, L. (2004) `The Science of Better Letters', The Hartford (CT) Courant, 21 March: C1.
6.
Brummett, B. (1994) Rhetoric in Popular Culture. New York: St. Martin's Press.
7.
Buranen, L. and A. Roy (1999) Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
Burkett, L. (2004) `Weeding out the "Turf' Letters"', San Antonio (TX) Express-News, 2 May: H2.
9.
Chinlund, C. (2003) `Whose Comments Are They?', Boston Globe, 3 February: A13.
10.
Condit, C.M. (1994) `Hegemony in a Mass-Mediated Society: Concordance about Reproductive Technologies', Critical Studies in Mass Communication11(3): 205-30.
11.
Coulson, A. (2004) `Sound Off: Send Us Letters and Columns, but in Your Own Words Please', St Paul (MN) Pioneer-Press, 4 January: E6.
12.
Davis, H. and G. Rarick (1964) `Functions of Editorials and Letters to the Editor' , Journalism Quarterly41(1): 108-9.
13.
Evensen, J. (23 March 2003) `Grass-Roots Letters Are Sometimes "Astroturf"' , Salt Lake City (UT) Deseret News, p. AA1.
14.
Fitzgerald, M. (2006) `Weekly Owner Starts Charging for Endorsement Letters-to-the-Editor' , Editor & Publisher, 2 November, URL (consulted November 2006): http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003349839
15.
Fur is Not a Fabric (2004) `Write a Letter to the Editor', URL (consulted June 2004): http://www.furisnotfabric.com/action_letter.html
16.
Gannett News Service (2003) `Many Soldiers, Same Letter', The Portland Oregonian, 11 October: A1.
17.
Glaser, M. (2006) `Can Newspaper Letter Editors Stop Astroturf Onslaught?' , MediaShift, 13 June, URL (consulted June 2006): http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/06/digging_deepercan_newspaper_le.html
18.
Gramsci, A. (2001[1971]) `(i) History of the Subaltern Classes; (ii) The Concept of Ideology; (iii) Cultural Themes: Ideological Material', in G. M. Durham and D. M. Kellner (eds) Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks, pp. 43-7. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19.
Grey, D. and T. Brown (1970) `Letters to the Editor: Hazy Reflections of Public Opinion', Journalism Quarterly47(3): 450-6, 471.
20.
Housing Minnesota (2004) `Write a Letter to the Editor of your Local Newspaper', URL (consulted June 2004): http://www.housingminnesota.org/pages.cfm?PageID=40
21.
Hynds, E.C. (1991) `Editorial Page Editors Discuss Use of Letters' , Newspaper Research Journal13(1): 124-36.
22.
Jameson, F. (2000) `Postmodernism and Consumer Society', in C. Cazeaux (ed.) The Continental Aesthetics Reader, pp. 282-94. London: Routledge .
23.
Jenson, J. and S. de Castell (2004) `"Turn It In": Technological Challenges to Academic Ethics', Education, Communication and Information4(2/3): 245-67.
24.
Kapoor, S. (1995) `Most Papers Receive More Letters', The Masthead17(2): 5-9.
25.
Kellner, D. (1990) Television and the Crisis of Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
Klein, W.S. (2003) `Faking the Voice of the People', Christian Science Monitor (Boston, MA), 31 January: 11.
27.
Lawrence, J. (2004) `Fake Letters Are Published Lies', Rochester (NY) Democrat and Chronicle, 25 August: A12.
28.
Lee, J.S. (2003) `Editors and Lobbyists Wage High-Tech War over Letters', New York Times, 27 January: C10.
29.
Lubrano, G. (2003) `When Form Letters Are in Bad Form', The San Diego (CA) Union-Tribune, 17 February: B7.
30.
McGough, M. (2004) `Manchurian Letter Writers? If "Astroturf" Endorsements Are Suspect, Why Isn't Bloc Voting or the Political Party?', Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 2 August: A13.
31.
Mokhiber, R. (2000) `Fronting for PhRMA', Multinational Monitor21(7/8): 38.
32.
Northwest Old-Growth Campaign (2004) URL (consulted June 2004): http://www.nwoldgrowth.org/libraryfiles/How-to-write-a-letter-to-the-editor.doc
33.
O'Brien, S. (2002) `Mowing down the Astroturf'', The Denver Post, 14 July: E6.
34.
Pritchard, D. and D. Berkowitz (1991) `How Readers' Letters May Influence Editors and News Emphasis: A Content Analysis of 10 Newspapers, 1948-1978', Journalism Quarterly68(3): 388-95.
35.
Prsa (2008) `PRSA Member Code of Ethics', URL (consulted May 2008): http://www.prsa.org/aboutUs/ethics/preamble_en.html
36.
Quenqua, D. (2003) `Boston Globe to Ban Form Letters from Advocacies' , Boston Globe, 10 February: 3.
37.
Reader, B. (2005a) `An Ethical "Blind Spot": Problems of Anonymous Letters to the Editor', Journal of Mass Media Ethics20(1): 62-76.
38.
Reader, B. (2005b) `Who's Really Writing Those "Canned" Letters to the Editor?', Newspaper Research Journal26(2&3): 43-56.
39.
Reader, B., G. Stempel and D. Daniel (2004) `Age, Wealth, Income Predict Letters to Editor', Newspaper Research Journal25(4): 55-66.
40.
Renfro, P.C. (1979) `Bias in Selection of Letters to the Editor', Journalism Quarterly56(4): 822-6.
41.
Richardson, J. and B. Franklin (2004) `Letters of Intent: Election Campaigning and Orchestrated Public Debate in Newspapers' Letters to the Editor', Political Communication21(4): 459-78.
42.
Roddy, D. (2003) `Bush-backing Letters to Editor Eerily Similar' , Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 25 January, p. D1.
43.
Salter, L. (2005) `The Communicative Structures of Journalism and Public Relations', Journalism6(1): 90-106.
44.
SPJ (2005) `Code of Ethics' , URL (consulted May 2008): http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp
45.
Stillar, G. (1998) Analyzing Everyday Texts: Discourse, Rhetoric, and Social Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Stodder, J. (2006) `Another PR Tactic about to Bite the Dust', From theDesert to the Sea, 5 June, URL (consulted 28 September 2006): http://johnstodderinexile.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/another-pr-tactic-about-to-bite-the-dust
47.
Tsoukalas, T. and S. Glantz (2003) `The Duluth Clean Indoor Air Ordinance: Problems and Success in Fighting the Tobacco Industry at the Local Level in the 21st Century', Journal of Public Health93(8): 1214-20.
48.
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2001) `Letters to the Editor as a Forum for Public Deliberation: Modes of Publicity and Democratic Debate', Critical Studies in Media Communication18(3): 308-20.
49.
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002) `The Construction of the Public in Letters to the Editor: Deliberative Democracy and the Idiom of Insanity', Journalism3(2): 183-204.
