Increases in neighborhood income are often attributed to the in-migration of higher income people. We use individual tax records from 1994 to 2015 to show a more nuanced finding. New residents generally have lower incomes than existing residents when they first move into a zip code. However, in-movers have steeper income growth and catch up with original residents within ten years. This pattern is mediated by turnover and generally short tenures for younger people, highlighting the importance of selective migration in combination with incumbents’ income growth in differentiating high- and low-growth zip codes.
BaileyNickvan GentWouter P. C.MusterdSako. 2017. “Remaking Urban Segregation: Processes of Income Sorting and Neighbourhood Change.”Population, Space and Place23 (3): e2013. doi:10.1002/psp.2013.
2.
BereitschaftBradley. 2020. “Gentrification Central: A Change-Based Typology of the American Urban Core, 2000–2015.”Applied Geography118 (May): 102206. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102206.
3.
ClarkWilliam A. V.2013. “Life Course Events and Residential Change: Unpacking Age Effects on the Probability of Moving.”Journal of Population Research30:319–34.
4.
ClarkWilliam A.V.MaasRegan. 2015. “Interpreting Migration Through the Prism of Reasons for Moves.”Population, Space and Place21 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1002/psp.1844.
5.
ClayPhilip. 1979. Neighborhood Renewal: Middle Class Resettlement and Internal Upgrading in American Neighborhoods. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6.
ComandonAndreOngPaul. 2020. “South Los Angeles Since the 1960s: Race, Place, and Class.”The Review of Black Political Economy47 (1): 50–74. doi:10.1177/0034644619873105.
DeLucaStefanieWoodHollyRosenblattPeter. 2019. “Why Poor Families Move (And Where They Go): Reactive Mobility and Residential Decisions.”City & Community18 (2): 556–93. doi:10.1111/cico.12386.
9.
EllenIngrid GouldO’ReganKatherine M.2011. “How Low Income Neighborhoods Change: Entry, Exit, and Enhancement.”Regional Science and Urban Economics41 (2): 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.12.005.
10.
EllenIngrid GouldTorrats-EspinosaGerard. 2019. “Gentrification and Fair Housing: Does Gentrification Further Integration?”Housing Policy Debate29 (5): 835–51. doi:10.1080/10511482.2018.1524440.
11.
GreenleeAndrew J.2019. “Assessing the Intersection of Neighborhood Change and Residential Mobility Pathways for the Chicago.”Housing Policy Debate29 (1): 186–212.
12.
HochstenbachCodyvan GentWouter P. C.2015. “An Anatomy of Gentrification Processes: Variegating Causes of Neighbourhood Change.”Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space47 (7): 1480–1501. doi:10.1177/0308518X15595771.
13.
HoustonDonald. 2005. “Employability, Skills Mismatch and Spatial Mismatch in Metropolitan Labour Markets.”Urban Studies42 (2): 221–43.
14.
HwangJackelynDingLei. 2020. “Unequal Displacement: Gentrification, Racial Stratification, and Residential Destinations in Philadelphia.”American Journal of Sociology126 (2): 354–406. doi:10.1086/711015.
LarrimoreJeffMortensonJacobSplinterDavid. 2021. “Household Incomes in Tax Data: Using Addresses to Move from Tax-Unit to Household Income Distributions.”Journal of Human Resources56 (2): 600–31. doi:10.3368/jhr.56.2.0718-9647R1.
17.
Loukaitou-SiderisAnastasiaGonzalezSilviaOngPaul. 2019. “Triangulating Neighborhood Knowledge to Understand Neighborhood Change: Methods to Study Gentrification.”Journal of Planning Education and Research39 (2): 227–42. doi:10.1177/0739456X17730890.
18.
NiedomyslThomas. 2011. “How Migration Motives Change over Migration Distance: Evidence on Variation across Socio-Economic and Demographic Groups.”Regional Studies45 (6): 843–55. doi:10.1080/00343401003614266.
19.
SchafranAlex. 2013. “Origins of an Urban Crisis: The Restructuring of the San Francisco Bay Area and the Geography of Foreclosure: The Geography of Foreclosure in San Francisco.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37 (2): 663–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01150.x.
20.
SharkeyPatrick. 2012. “Temporary Integration, Resilient Inequality: Race and Neighborhood Change in the Transition to Adulthood.”Demography49 (3): 889–912. doi:10.1007/s13524-012-0105-0.
21.
SharkeyPatrick. 2013. Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress toward Racial Equality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
SouthScott J.HuangYingSpringAmy. 2022. “Proximate Sources of Growth in Neighborhood Income Segregation: Class-Selective Migration versus in Situ Change.”Social Science Research101 (January): 102624. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102624.
23.
TeernstraAnnalies. 2014. “Neighbourhood Change, Mobility and Incumbent Processes: Exploring Income Developments of In-Migrants, Out-Migrants and Non-Migrants of Neigh-bourhoods.”Urban Studies51 (5): 978–99. doi:10.1177/0042098013494422.
24.
VogiazidesLouisaChihayaGuilherme Kenji. 2020. “Migrants’ Long-Term Residential Trajectories in Sweden: Persistent Neighbourhood Deprivation or Spatial Assimilation?”Housing Studies35 (5): 875–902. doi:10.1080/02673037.2019.1636937.
25.
ZukMiriamBierbaumAriel H.ChappleKarenGorskaKarolinaLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasia. 2018. “Gentri-fication, Displacement, and the Role of Public Investment.”Journal of Planning Literature33 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1177/0885412217716439.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
