Over the past decade, over $1 billion of public funding has been dedicated toward developing streetcar systems in the United States. Most systems in operation today are underperforming. I explore factors that may contribute toward poor system performance by examining the experiences of several U.S. modern-era streetcar systems. Focus is placed on the tension generated between often conflicting goals which drive system development. I find that a failure to adequately balance conflicting goals shapes planning and policy decisions in a manner that often supports a streetcar’s place-making capability while compromising its place-taking capability (i.e., the ability to take people places).
BoisjolyGenevièveGriséEmilyMaguireMeadhbhVeilletteMarie-PierDeboosereRobbinBerrebiEmmaEl-GeneidyAhmed. 2018. “Invest in the Ride: A 14 Year Longitudinal Analysis of the Determinants of Public Transport Ridership in 25 North American cities.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice116:434–45.
3.
BoschmannE. EricKwanMei-Po. 2008. “Toward Socially Sustainable Urban Transportation: Progress and Potentials.”International Journal of Sustainable Transportation2:138–57.
4.
BrownJeffrey R.2013. “The Modern Streetcar in the US: An Examination of its Ridership, Performance, and Function as a Public Transportation Mode.”Journal of Public Transportation16 (4): 43–61.
5.
BrownJeffrey R.NixonHilaryRamosEnrique L.2015. The Purpose, Function, and Performance of Streetcar Transit in the Modern U.S. City: A Multiple Case Study Investigation. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute. Report12-39.
CampbellScott. 1996. “Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?: Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development”Journal of the American Planning Association62:296–312.
8.
CerveroRobertBrunkJohn. 1983. “Intergovernmental Goals for Public Transit.”Journal of Advanced Transportation17 (1): 29–47.
9.
CerveroRobertGuerraErickAlStefan. 2017. Beyond Mobility: Planning Cities for People and Places. Washington, DC: Island Press.
CulverGregg. 2017. “Mobility and the Making of the Neoliberal “Creative City”: The Streetcar as a Creative City Project?”Journal of Transport Geography, 58:22–30.
14.
CurtisCareyMellorRoger. 2011. “Anticipating a New Railway: The Relevance of Transit-Oriented Development to Businesses in a Car-Oriented City”Urban Policy and Research29(2): 141–65.
15.
DekaDevajyoti. 2004. “Social and Environmental Justice Issues in Urban Transportation.” In The Geography of Urban Transportation, edited by /HansonSGiulianoG., 332–355. New York: Guilford Press.
16.
DelboscAlexaCurrieGraham. 2011. “Using Lorenz Curves to Assess Public Transport Equity.”Journal of Transport Geography19 (6): 1252–59.
17.
DelmelleElizabeth CahillCasasIrene. 2012. “Evaluating the Spatial Equity of Bus Rapid Transit-Based Accessibility Patterns in a Developing Country: The Case of Cali, Colombia.”Transport Policy20:36–46.
18.
DesaulniersGuyHickmanMark D.2007. “Chapter 2 Public Transit.” In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, edited by BarnhartCynthiaLaporteGilbert, 69–127. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19.
EpsteinMarc J.BuhovacAdriana RejcYuthasKristi. 2015. “Managing Social, Environmental and Financial Performance Simultaneously.”Long Range Planning48 (1): 35–45.
20.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2003. “Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: 2002 Conditions and Performance Report.”https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/910
21.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2020. “Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: 2019 Conditions and Performance Report.”https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/43598
22.
FieldingGordon J.AndersonShirley C.1983. “Public Transit Performance Evaluation: Application to Section 15 Data.”Transportation Research Record947:1–6.
23.
FurmaniakThomas B.SchumannJohn W.2014. Light Rail and Streetcar Systems: How They Differ; How They Overlap. Washington, DC: American Public Transportation Association.
24.
GehlJan. 1987. Life Between Buildings. Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
25.
GiffordJonathanMallettWilliam J.TalkingtonScott W. . 1994. Implementing Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991: Issues and Early Field Data (Transportation Research Record (1466)). https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1994/1466/1466-003.pdf
26.
GoodrickDelwyn. 2014. “Comparative Case Studies,” Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 9. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
27.
GrengsJoe. 2005. “The Abandoned Social Goals of Public Transit in the Neoliberal City of the USA.”City9 (1): 51–66.
HoveeEricGustafsonRick. 2012. Streetcar-Development Linkage: The Portland Streetcar Loop. Portland, OR: Obletz Johnsen Inc.
30.
HreljaRobertKhanJamilPetterssonFredrik. 2020. “How to Create Efficient Public Transport Systems? A Systematic Review of Critical Problems and Approaches for Addressing the Problems”Transport Policy98:186–96.
31.
JonesDavid. 1985. Urban Transit Policy: An Economic and Political History. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
KingDavid A.FischerLauren Ames. 2016. “Streetcar Projects as Spatial Planning: A Shift in Transport Planning in the United States”Journal of Transport Geography54:383–90.
33.
KrumholzNormanForesterJohn. 1990. Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector (Vol. 43). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
34.
ManaughKevinBadamiMadhav G.El-GeneidyAhmed M.2015. “Integrating Social Equity into Urban Transportation Planning: A Critical Evaluation of Equity Objectives and Measures in Transportation Plans in North America.”Transport Policy37:167–76.
35.
McLeodSamScheurerJanCurtisCarey. 2017. “Urban Public Transport: Planning Principles and Emerging Practice”Journal of Planning Literature32:223–39.
36.
MerlinLouis A.SingerMatanLevineJonathan. 2021. “Influences on Transit Ridership and Transit Accessibility in US Urban Areas.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice150:63–73.
NolanJ. F.RitchiePamela C.RowcroftJohn E.2002. “Identifying and Measuring Public Policy Goals: ISTEA and the US Bus Transit Industry.”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization48 (3): 291–304.
39.
PlaskonTerenceTrainorStephanieGrantMichael. 2011. Statewide Transit Goal Setting (National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research Results Digest No 358). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
RamosEnrique L.BrownJeffrey R.NixonHilary. 2015a. “Streetcar Resurgence in the United States: Transit Strategy, Growth-Machine Tactic, or Some of Both?”Transportation Research Record2540:30–38.
42.
RamosEnrique L.BrownJeffrey R.NixonHilary. 2015b. “The Transit Performance of Modern-Era Streetcars: A Consideration of Five U.S. Cities.”Transportation Research Record2534:57–67.
43.
State of Ohio. 2010. “Cincinnati Streetcar TIGER II Application.”
44.
StuartDarwin G.1996. “Goal-Setting and Performance Measurement in Transportation Planning and Programming.”Journal of Public Transportation1 (2): 49–72.
TaylorBrian D.MillerDouglasIsekiHiroyukiFinkCamille. 2009. “Nature and/or Nurture? Analyzing the Determinants of Transit Ridership Across US Urbanized Areas.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice43:60–77.
47.
TaylorBrian D.MorrisEric A.2015. “Public Transportation Objectives and Rider Demographics: Are Transit’s Priorities Poor Public Policy?”Transportation42:347–67.
48.
ThompsonGregoryBrownJeffreyBhattacharyaTorsha. 2012. “What Really Matters for Increasing Transit Ridership: Understanding the Determinants of Transit Ridership Demand in Broward County, Florida.”Urban Studies49:3327–45.
49.
VuchicVukan R.2017. Transportation for Livable Cities. London: Routledge.
50.
WalkerJarrett. 2008. “Purpose-Driven Public Transport: Creating a Clear Conversation about Public Transport Goals.”Journal of Transport Geography16:436–42.
51.
WeiRanLiuXiaoyueMuYongjianWangLimingGolubAaronFarberSteven. 2017. “Evaluating Public Transit Services for Operational Efficiency and Access Equity.”Journal of Transport Geography65:70–79.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
