We examine to what extent Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) contributes to a successful participatory process and how context affects the tool’s role in both process and results. We tested a tool to visualize accessibility effects of transport projects, using it in participatory workshops related to a major bus corridor proposal in Santiago de Chile. We innovated in the tool itself, to visualize overcrowding effects as a way to include comfort issues. We found that the GIS encouraged a sincere and realistic conversation among participants. Perceptions of the project did not necessarily improve, but the tool did reduce polarization of opinions.
AbersRebecca. 2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
2.
AvritzerLeonardo. 2010. “Living under a Democracy: Participation and Its Impact on the Living Conditions of the Poor.” Latin American Research Review45 (S1): 166–85.
3.
AvritzerLeonardo. 2012. “The Different Designs of Public Participation in Brazil: Deliberation, Power Sharing and Public Ratification.” Critical Policy Studies6 (2): 113–27.
4.
BaileyKeironGrossardtTed. 2010. “Toward structured public involvement: Justice, geography and collaborative geospatial/geovisual decision support systems.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers100 (1): 57–86.
5.
BickerstaffKarenRodneyTolleyGordonWalker. 2002. “Transport Planning and Participation: The Rhetoric and Realities of Public Involvement.” Journal of Transport Geography10 (1): 61–73. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00027-8.
6.
BickerstaffKarenWalkerGordon. 2005. “Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning.” Urban Studies42 (12): 2123–44.
7.
BoonstraBeitskeBoelensLuuk. 2011. “Self-Organization in Urban Development: Towards a New Perspective on.” Urban Research and Practice4 (2): 99–122.
8.
BrownGreganKyttäMarketta. 2014. “Key Issues and Research Priorities for Public Participation (PPGIS): A Synthesis Based on Empirical Research.” Applied Geography46:122–36.
9.
BrownGregFagerholmNora. 2015. “Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation.” Ecosystem services13: 119–33.
10.
CaseCherylHawthorneTimothy L.2013. “Served or Unserved? A Site Suitability Analysis of Social Services in Atlanta, Georgia Using Geographic Information Systems.” Applied Geography38:96–106. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.012.
11.
CaselloJeffrey M.WillTownsBélangerJulieSanathanKassiedass. 2015. “Public Engagement in Public Transportation Projects: Challenges and Recommendations.” Transportation Research Record2537 (1): 88–95. doi:10.3141/2537-10.
12.
CohenJoshua. 1997. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by BohmanJamesRehgWilliam67–92. Cambridge: MIT Press.
GastilJ.2006. Democracy and Citizenship: Citizen Participation and Public Deliberation in Mexican Local Governments. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Latin American Program.
25.
GeursKarst T.van WeeBert. 2004. “Accessibility Evaluation of Land-use and Transport Strategies: Review and Research Directions.” Journal of Transport Geography12 (2): 127–40.
GiuffridaNadiaPiraMichela LeGiuseppeInturriMatteoIgnaccolo. 2019. “Mapping with Stakeholders: An Overview of Public Participatory GIS and VGI in Transport Decision-making.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information8 (4): 198. doi:10.3390/ijgi8040198.
HealeyPat. 2003. “Collaborative Planning in Perspective.” Planning Theory2 (2): 101–23.
30.
HealeyPat. 2006. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
HealeyPat. 2020. “Judith Innes.” Planning Theory & Practice21 (5): 797–802.
32.
HortonMilesFreirePaulo. 1990. We Make the Road by Walking: Conversations on Education and Social Change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
HovorkaDirkAuerbachNancy. 2010. “Building Community Sustainability with Geographic Information Systems.” In AMCIS Proceedings, vol. 260. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/260/.
34.
InnesJudithBooherDavid E.1999. “Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association65 (4): 412–23.
35.
InnesJudithBooherDavid E.2002. “Network Power in Collaborative Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (3): 221–36.
36.
InnesJudithBooherDavid E.2010. Planning with Complexity. London: Routledge.
37.
Kahila-TaniMaaritKyttaMarkettaGeertmanStan. 2019. “Does Mapping Improve Public Participation? Exploring the Pros and Cons of using Public Participation GIS in Urban Planning Practices.” Landscape and Urban Planning186: 45–55.
38.
KarnerAlexLondonJonathanRowangouldDanaManaughKevin. 2020. “From Transportation Equity to Transportation Justice: Within, Through, and Beyond the State.” Journal of Planning Literature35 (4): 440–59.
39.
LoweryDamon R.MorseWayde C.2013. “A Qualitative Method for Collecting Spatial Data on Important Places for Recreation, Livelihoods, and Ecological Meanings: Integrating Focus Groups with Public Participation Geographic Information Systems.” Society & Natural Resources26 (12): 1422–37. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.819954.
40.
LucasKaren. 2004. Running on Empty. Bristol: Policy Press.
41.
MahmoudiDillonAmyLubitowChristensenMackenzie A.2020. “Reproducing Spatial Inequality? The Sustainability Fix and Barriers to Urban Mobility in Portland, Oregon.” Urban Geography41 (6): 801–22. doi:10.1080/02723638.2019.1698865.
42.
ManvilleMichaelLevineAdam S.2018. “What Motivates Public Support for Public Transit?”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice118:567–80.
43.
MarsdenGregReardonLousie. 2017. “Questions of Governance: Rethinking the Study of Transportation Policy.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice101:238–51.
44.
MartensKarel. 2017. Transport Justice: Designing Fair Transportation Systems. New York: Routledge.
45.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). 2017. Department of Urban Studies and Planning, “CoAXs. Collaborative Accessibility-Based Stakeholder Engagement for Public Transportation Planning”. http://coaxs.scripts.mit.edu/home/
Navas-DukCristian. 2017. “Testing Collaborative Accessibility-Based Engagement Tools: Santiago de Chile Case.” Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
48.
NyergesTimothy L.RobbMontejanoCarolineOshiroMatthewDadswell. 1997. “Group-Based Geographic Information Systems for Transportation Improvement Site Selection.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies5 (6): 349–69. doi:10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00002-3.
49.
OviedoDanielDuarteNatalia V.PintoAna A.2020. Urban Mobility and Social Equity in Latin America: Evidence, Concepts, Method. Bingley: Emerald.
50.
PereiraRafael H.TimSchwanenDavidBanister. 2017. “Distributive Justice and Equity in Transportation.” Transport Reviews37 (2): 170–91. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660.
51.
RydinYvonnePenningtonMark. 2000. “Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The Collective Action Problem and the Potential Social Capital.” Local Environment5 (2): 153–69.
52.
SagarisLake. 2014. “Citizen Participation for Sustainable Transport: The Case of “Living City” in Santiago, Chile (1997-2012).” Journal of Transport Geography41:74–83.
53.
SagarisLake. 2018. “Citizen Participation for Sustainable Transport: Lessons for Change from Santiago and Temuco, Chile.” Research in Transportation Economics69:402–10.
54.
SagarisLake. 2021. “Community Participation in Public Transport Decision-making.” In Handbook of Public Transport, edited by MulleyCorinneNelsonJohnIsonStephen, 120–36. London: Routledge.
55.
SagarisLakeTiznado-AitkenIgnacio. 2020. “Sustainable Transport and Gender Equity: Insights from Santiago, Chile.” In Urban Mobility and Social Equity in Latin America: Evidence, Concepts, Methods, edited by DanielOviedoDuarteNatalia VillamizarPintoAna Marcela Ardilavol. 12, 103–34. Bingley: Emerald.
ShellerMimi. 2019. “Theorizing Mobility Justice”. In Mobilities, Mobility Justice and Social Justice, edited by CookNancyButzDavid22–36. New York: Routledge.
58.
SieberRenee. 2006. “Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers96 (3): 491–507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x.
59.
StewartAnson. 2017. “Mapping Transit Accessibility: Possibilities for Public Participation.” Transportation Research Part A104:150–66.
60.
Stewart AnsonF.ZegrasP. Christopher. 2016. “CoAXs: A Collaborative Accessibility-Based Stakeholder Engagement System for Communicating Transport Impacts.” Research in Transportation Economics59: 423–33.
61.
StewartAnsonChrisZegras P.PhilTinnRosenblumJeffrey L.2018. “Tangible Tools for Public Transportation Planning: Public Involvement and Learning for Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Design.” Transportation Research Record2672 (8): 785–95. doi:10.1177/0361198118797462.
62.
TaylorLucy. 1998. Citizenship, Participation, and Democracy: Changing Dynamics in Chile and Argentina. London: Macmillan Press.
63.
TaylorLucy. 2004. “Client-Ship and Citizenship in Latin America.” Bulletin of Latin American Research23 (2): 213–27.
64.
TillyCharles. 2007. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
VajjhalaShalini P.WalkerWendy M.2010. “Roads to Participatory Planning: Integrating Cognitive Mapping and GIS for Transport Prioritization in Rural Lesotho.” Journal of Maps6 (1): 488–504. doi:10.4113/jom.2010.1086.
66.
VecchioGiovanniIgnacioTiznado-AitkenRicardoHurtubia. 2020. “Transport and Equity in Latin America: A Critical Review of Socially Oriented Accessibility Assessments.” Transport Reviews40 (3): 354–81. doi:10.1080/01441647.2020.1711828.
67.
Vergara-PerucichFranciscoCorrea-ParraJuanAguirre-NuñezCarlos. 2020. “The spatial correlation between the spread of COVID-19 and vulnerable urban areas in Santiago de Chile.” Critical Housing Analysis7 (2): 21–35.
68.
VerlinghieriErsiliaSchwanenTim. 2020. “Transport and Mobility Justice: Evolving Discussions.” Journal of Transport Geography87: 102798.
69.
VukomanovicJelenaSmartLindsey S.2021. “GIS Participatory Modeling.” In The Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge. 1st Quarter 2021 edition, edited by WilsonJohn P. doi:10.22224/gistbok/2021.1.14.
70.
ZegrasChrisLeapeJonathanCarrascoJuan AntonioNavasCristianVenterChristoVergel-TovarErik. 2020. “Scaling Up Innovative Participatory Design for Public Transportation Planning: Lessons from Experiments in the Global South.” Transportation Research Record2674 (12): 25–37.
