Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining prominence as a crucial technology to transform and reshape the field of urban planning. However, several unanswered questions persist regarding the potential impacts of AI on urban and regional planning research and practice, as well as the issues involved and the appropriate responses and plans. This paper aims to address these concerns in the AI-enabled planning process and accordingly create a typology of urban planning AI to categorize and outline the progression of AI in urban planning, ranging from AI-assisted and AI-augmented planning to AI-automated and eventually AI-autonomized planning, based on a scoping literature review.
AburasM. M.AhamadM. S. S.OmarN. Q.2019. “Spatio-temporal Simulation and Prediction of Land-Use Change using Conventional and Machine Learning Models: A Review.”Environ Monit Assess191 (4): 205. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7330-6.
AllamZ.DhunnyZ. A.2019. “On Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Smart Cities.”Cities89: 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032.
4.
AllamZ.NewmanP.2018. “Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance.”Smart Cities1 (1): 4–25. doi:10.3390/smartcities1010002.
5.
AllenE.2008. “Clicking Toward Better Outcomes: Experience with INDEX, 1994 to 2006.” In Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions, edited by BrailR. K.Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Al-RaminiA.TakallouM. A.PiatkowskiD. P.AlsaleemF.2022. “Quantifying Changes in Bicycle Volumes Using Crowdsourced Data.”Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science49 (6): 1612–30. doi:10.1177/23998083211066103.
AndersonTheodore R.1965. “Urban Land Use Planning F. Stuart Chapin, Jr.”American Journal of Sociology71 (1): 116–17. doi:10.1086/224017.
10.
AndrewsC.CookeK.GomezA.HurtadoP.SanchezT.ShahS.WrightN.2022. “AI in Planning: Opportunities and Challenges and How to Prepare—Conclusions and Recommendations from APA’s ‘AI in Planning’ Foresight Community.”American Planning Association, September9. https://www.planning.org/publications/document//9255930.
11.
ArkseyHilaryO’MalleyLisa. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.”International Journal of Social Research Methodology8 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
12.
BaiZijianYangLeiFuChenyiLiuZhaocaiHeZhengbingZhuNing. 2022. “A Robust Approach to Integrated Wireless Charging Infrastructure Design and Bus Fleet Size Optimization.”Computers & Industrial Engineering168: Article 108046. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108046.
13.
BaoJ.HeT.RuanS.LiY.ZhengY.2017. “Planning Bike Lanes Based on Sharing-Bikes’ Trajectories.”Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1377–86. doi:10.1145/3097983.3098056.
14.
BattyM.XieY.1994. “From Cells to Cities.”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design21 (7): S31–48. doi:10.1068/b21S031.
15.
BenbyaH.PachidiS.JarvenpaaS. L.2021. “Special Issue Editorial: Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: Implications for Information Systems Research.”Journal of the Association for Information Systems22 (2): 281–303. doi:10.17705/1jais.00662.
16.
BertugliaC. S.2013. Urban Dynamics: Designing an Integrated Model. London: Routledge.
17.
BrailR. K.KlostermanR. E.2001. Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
18.
BrianN. L.2017. “Gender as a Variable in Natural-Language Processing: Ethical Considerations.”Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain, 1–11. doi:10.18653/v1/W17-1601.
19.
BulkeleyH.MarvinS.PalganY. V.McCormickK.Breitfuss-LoidlM.MaiL.von WirthT.FrantzeskakiN.2018. “Urban Living Laboratories: Conducting the Experimental City?”European Urban and Regional Studies26 (4): 317–35. doi:10.1177/0969776418787222.
20.
CasaliYleniaAydinNazli YoncaComesTina. 2022. “Machine Learning for Spatial Analyses in Urban Areas: A Scoping Review.”Sustainable Cities and Society85: Article 104050. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.104050.
21.
CederA.2016. Public Transit Planning and Operation: Modeling, Practice and Behavior. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
22.
ChanJ. K. H.XiangW. N.2022. “Fifty Years After the Wicked-Problems Conception: Its Practical and Theoretical Impacts on Planning and Design.”Socio-ecological Practice Research4 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1007/s42532-022-00106-w.
ChenW.ZhaoL.KangQ.DiF.2020. “Systematizing Heterogeneous Expert Knowledge, Scenarios and Goals Via a Goal-Reasoning Artificial Intelligence Agent for Democratic Urban Land Use Planning.”Cities101: Article 102703. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102703.
25.
ChowdhuryM. M.HasanM.SafaitS.ChakiD.UddinJ.2018. “A Traffic Congestion Forecasting Model Using CMTF and Machine Learning.”2018 Joint 7th International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV) and 2018 2nd International Conference on Imaging, Vision & Pattern Recognition (ICIEV), Kitakyushu, Japan, 357–62. doi:10.1109/ICIEV.2018.8640985.
26.
ClarkeK. C.2008. “A Decade of Cellular Urban Modeling with SLEUTH: Unresolved Issues and Problems.” In Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions, edited by BrailR. K.Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
27.
CornillieThomas C.2022. “Public Transportation Systems: Principles of System Design, Operations Planning and Real-Time Control.”Journal of the American Planning Association88 (1): 145–6. doi:10.1080/01944363.2021.1989963.
28.
CugurulloF.2020. “Urban Artificial Intelligence: From Automation to Autonomy in the Smart City.”Frontiers in Sustainable Cities2: Article 38. doi:10.3389/frsc.2020.00038.
29.
CugurulloF.AcheampongR. A.GueriauM.DusparicI.2021. “The Transition to Autonomous Cars, the Redesign of Cities and the Future of Urban Sustainability.”Urban Geography42: 833–59. doi:10.1080/02723638.2020.1746096.
30.
DarenC. B.ThomasW. S.KeithB.2010. “Crowdsourcing Public Participation in Transit Planning: Preliminary Results from the Next Stop Design Case.”TRB 89th Annual Meeting Compendium, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://trid.trb.org/view/911245
31.
De La BarraT.2001. “Integrated Land Use and Transport Modeling: The TRANUS Experience.” In Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models and Visualization Tools, edited by BrailR. K., 129–56. Redlands, CA: ESRI (R. E. Klosterman).
32.
DengT.ZhangK.ShenZ.-J.2021. “A Systematic Review of a Digital Twin City: A New Pattern of Urban Governance Toward Smart Cities.”Journal of Management Science and Engineering6 (2): 125–34. doi:10.1016/j.jmse.2021.03.003.
33.
DeshmukhS.2018. “Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry.”Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization10 (2): 47. doi:10.4103/jicdro.jicdro_17_18.
34.
DesouzaKevin C.BhagwatwarAkshay. 2014. “Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of U.S. Cities.”Journal of Urban Technology21 (4): 25–50. doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.954898.
35.
DuarteJ. P.BeirãoJ. N.MontenegroN.GilJ.2012. “City Induction: A Model for Formulating, Generating, and Evaluating Urban Designs.” In Digital Urban Modeling and Simulation, edited by ArisonaStefan MüllerAschwandenGideonHalatschJanWonkaPeter, 73–98. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
36.
EiniMohammadKaboliHesam SeyedRashidianMohsenHedayatHossein. 2020. “Hazard and Vulnerability in Urban Flood Risk Mapping: Machine Learning Techniques and Considering the Role of Urban Districts.”International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction50: Article 101687. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101687.
FanC.ZhangC.YahjaA.MostafaviA.2021. “Disaster City Digital Twin: A Vision for Integrating Artificial and Human Intelligence for Disaster Management.”International Journal of Information Management56: Article 102049. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102049.
39.
FotheringhamA. S.RogersonP. A.2008. The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis. London: Sage.
40.
FuX.LiC.ZhaiW.2023. “Using Natural Language Processing to Read Plans.”Journal of the American Planning Association89: 107–19. doi:10.1080/01944363.2022.2038659.
41.
GrønsundT.AanestadM.2020. “Augmenting the Algorithm: Emerging Human-in-the-Loop Work Configurations.”The Journal of Strategic Information Systems29 (2): Article 101614. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101614.
42.
GrisogonoA. M.2020. “How Could Future AI Help Tackle Global Complex Problems?”Front Robot AI7: 50. doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00050.
43.
GuoY.WangS.ZhengL.LuM.2017. “Trajectory Data Driven Transit-Transportation Planning.”2017 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD), Shanghai, China, 380–84. doi:10.1109/cbd.2017.72.
44.
HanY.AshK.MaoL.PengZ.-R.2020. “An Agent-Based Model for Community Flood Adaptation Under Uncertain Sea-Level Rise.”Climatic Change162 (4): 2257–76. doi:10.1007/s10584-020-02802-6.
45.
HanLiZhaoJingyuanGaoYuejingGuZhaolin. 2022. “Prediction and Evaluation of Spatial Distributions of Ozone and Urban Heat Island Using a Machine Learning Modified Land Use Regression Method.”Sustainable Cities and Society78: Article 103643. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103643.
46.
HanYangLamJacqueline C. KLiVictor O. KZhangQi. 2022. “A Domain-Specific Bayesian Deep-Learning Approach for Air Pollution Forecast.”IEEE Transactions on Big Data8 (4): 1034–46. doi:10.1109/tbdata.2020.3005368.
47.
HanY.PengZ.-R.2019. “The Integration of Local Government, Residents, and Insurance in Coastal Adaptation: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach.”Computers, Environ-ment and Urban Systems76: 69–79. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.04.001.
48.
HeppenstallA. J.CrooksA. T.BattyM.SeeL. M.2012. “Reflections and Conclusions: Geographical Models to Address Grand Challenges.” In Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems, edited by HeppenstallA.CrooksA.SeeL.BattyM., 739–47. Dordrecht: Springer.
49.
HoltelS.2016. “Artificial Intelligence Creates a Wicked Problem for the Enterprise.”Procedia Computer Science99: 171–80. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.109.
50.
HuxleyMargoInchAndy. 2020. “Urban Planning.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, edited by KobayashiA., 87–92. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
IsardW.1960. “Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science.”Рипол Классик. https://trid.trb.org/view/91130.
53.
JariyasunantJ.WorkD. B.KerkezB.SenguptaR.GlaserS.BayenA.2011. “Mobile Transit Trip Planning with Real-Time Data.”Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States. https://trid.trb.org/view/911251
54.
KadlecP.GabrysB.2010. “Adaptive On-Line Prediction Soft Sensing Without Historical Data.”The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), IEEE, Barcelona, Spain, 1–8. doi:10.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596965.
KangYuhaoZhangFanPengWenzheGaoSongRaoJinmengDuarteFabioRattiCarlo. 2021. “Understanding House Price Appreciation Using Multi-source Big Geo-Data and Machine Learning.”Land Use Policy111: Article 104919. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104919.
57.
KlostermanR. E.1995. “The Appropriateness of Geographic Information-Systems for Regional-Planning in the Developing-World.”Computers Environment and Urban Systems19 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1016/0198-9715(94)00028-X.
58.
KontokostaC. E.2018. “Urban Informatics in the Science and Practice of Planning.”Journal of Planning Education and Research41 (4): 382–95. doi:10.1177/0739456x18793716.
59.
KosterR.BalaguerJ.TacchettiA.WeinsteinA.ZhuT.HauserO.WilliamsD., et al2022. “Human-Centred Mechanism Design with Democratic AI.”Nature Human Behaviour6 (10): 1398–1407. doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01383-x.
60.
KoutsopoulosH. N.MaZ.NoursalehiP.ZhuY.2019. “Transit Data Analytics for Planning, Monitoring, Control, and Information.” In Mobility Patterns, Big Data and Transport Analytics, edited by AntoniouC.DimitriouL.PereiraF., 229–61. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
61.
KumarNishantRaubalMartin. 2021. “Applications of Deep Learning in Congestion Detection, Prediction and Alleviation: A survey.”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies133: Article 103432. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103432.
62.
KwokR. H. F.BakerK. R.NapelenokS. L.TonnesenG. S.2014. “Photochemical Grid Model Implementation of VOC, NOx, and O3 Source Apportionment.”Geoscientific Model Development7: 5791–829. doi:10.5194/gmdd-7-5791-2014.
63.
LandisJ. D.1994. “The California Urban Futures Model: A New-Generation of Metropolitan Simulation-Models.”Environment and Planning: B-Planning & Design21 (4): 399–420. doi:10.1068/b210399.
64.
LeeD. B.1973. “Requiem for Large-Scale Models.”Journal of the American Institute of Planners39 (3): 163–78. doi:10.1080/01944367308977851.
65.
LeeuwenvanCoraAnnelien SmetsJacobsAnBallonPieter. 2021. “Blind Spots in AI: The Role of Serendipity and Equity in Algorithm-Based Decision-Making.”ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter23 (1): 42–49. doi:10.1145/3468507.3468514.
66.
LeszczynskiA.2019. “Glitchy Vignettes of Platform Urbanism.”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space38 (2): 189–208. doi:10.1177/0263775819878721.
67.
LiX.YehA. G. -. O.2000. “Modelling Sustainable Urban Development by the Integration of Constrained Cellular Automata and GIS.”International Journal of Geographical Information Science14 (2): 131–52. doi:10.1080/136588100240886.
68.
LiangXunLiuXiaopingLiXiaChenYiminTianHeYaoYao. 2018. “Delineating Multi-scenario Urban Growth Boundaries with a CA-based FLUS Model and Morphological Method.”Landscape and Urban Planning177: 47–63. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.016.
MatthewsR. B.GilbertN. G.RoachA.PolhillJ. G.GottsN. M.2007. “Agent-Based Land-Use Models: A Review of Applications.”Landscape Ecology22 (10): 1447–59. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1.
71.
McInroyL. B.2016. “Pitfalls, Potentials, and Ethics of Online Survey Research: LGBTQ and Other Marginalized and Hard-to-Access Youths.”Social Work Research40 (2): 83–94. doi:10.1093/swr/svw005.
72.
MeignanD.SimoninO.KoukamA.2007. “Simulation and Evaluation of Urban Bus-Networks Using a Multiagent Approach.”Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory15 (6): 659–71. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2007.02.005.
73.
MeyerM. D.2016. Transportation Planning Handbook: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Washington, DC: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781119174660.
Mora-GarciaRaul-TomasCespedes-LopezMaria-FranciscaPerez-SanchezV. Raul. 2022. “Housing Price Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms in COVID-19 Times.”Land11 (11): 2100. doi:10.3390/land11112100.
76.
NikV. M.MoazamiA.2021. “Using Collective Intelligence to Enhance Demand Flexibility and Climate Resilience in Urban Areas.”Applied Energy281: Article 116106. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116106.
77.
NikolaidouA.PapaioannouP.2018. “Utilizing Social Media in Transport Planning and Public Transit Quality: Survey of Literature.”Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems144 (4): 04018007. doi:10.1061/jtepbs.0000128.
78.
NilssonN. J.1998. Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. doi:10.1016/C2009-0-27773-7.
79.
NingWuSilvaElisabete A.2010. “Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Urban Land Dynamics: A Review.”Journal of Plan-ning Literature24 (3): 246–65. doi:10.1177/0885412210361571.
PawełG.2019. “Designing Urban Areas Using Traffic Simulations, Artificial Intelligence and Acquiring Feedback from Stakeholders.”Transportation Research Procedia41: 532–34. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.089.
82.
PelletierM. P.TrépanierM.MorencyC.2009. Smart Card Data in Public Transit Planning: A Review. Montreal, Quebec: CIRRELT.
QuanS. J.ParkJ.EconomouA.LeeS.2019. “Artificial Intelligence-Aided Design: Smart Design for Sustainable City Development.”Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science46 (8): 1581–99. doi:10.1177/2399808319867946.
87.
RenneJ.WolshonB.Murray-TuiteP.PandeA.2020. “Emergence of Resilience as a Framework for State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) in the United States.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment82. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.007.
88.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M.1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.”Policy Sciences4 (2): 155–69. doi:10.1007/Bf01405730.
89.
SætraH. S.2021. “A Typology of AI Applications in Politics.” In Artificial Intelligence and Its Contexts: Security, Business and Governance, edited by VisviziAnnaBodzianyMarek, 27–43. Cham: Springer.
90.
SanchezT. W.ShumwayH.GordnerT.LimT.2023. “The Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning.”International Journal of Urban Sciences27: 179–94. doi:10.1080/12265934.2022.2102538.
91.
SarkarB.SinhababuN.RoyM.PramanikP. K. DChoudhuryP.2020. “Mining Multilingual and Multiscript Twitter Data: Unleashing the Language and Script Barrier.”International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining16 (1): 107. doi:10.1504/ijbidm.2020.103847.
92.
ScholtenH. J.StillwellJ.2013. Geographical Information Systems for Urban and Regional Planning. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
93.
SchweitzerL.2014. “Planning and Social Media: A Case Study of Public Transit and Stigma on Twitter.”Journal of the American Planning Association80 (3): 218–38. doi:10.1080/01944363.2014.980439.
94.
SenA.2021. “DevOps, DevSecOps, AIOPS- Paradigms to IT Operations.” In Evolving Technologies for Computing, Communication and Smart World, edited by NoorA.SinghP. K.KolekarM. H.TanwarS.BhatnagarR. K.KhannaS., 211–21. Singapore: Springer.
95.
SmithR. G.EckrothJ.2017. “Building AI Applications: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow.”AI Magazine38 (1): 6–22. doi:10.1609/aimag.v38i1.2709.
96.
SoaresB. S.CerqueiraG. C.PennachinC. L.2002. “DINAMICA—A Stochastic Cellular Automata Model Designed to Simulate the Landscape Dynamics in an Amazonian Colonization Frontier.”Ecological Modelling154 (3): 217–35. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00059-5.
97.
StahlB. C.2021. “Ethical Issues of AI.” In Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future: An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies (SpringerBriefs in Research and Innovation Governance), edited by SchroederD.IatridisK.Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9
98.
SteinerF. R.ButlerK., and American Planning Association. 2012. Planning and Urban Design Standards. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
TimmermansJ.StahlB. C.IkonenV.BozdagE.2010. “The Ethics of Cloud Computing: A Conceptual Review.”2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, IEEE, Indianapolis, IN, 614–20. doi:10.1109/CloudCom.2010.59.
101.
TrencherG.2019. “Towards the Smart City 2.0: Empirical Evidence of Using Smartness as a Tool for Tackling Social Challenges.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change142: 117–28. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033.
van der GraafS.BallonP.2019. “Navigating Platform Urbanism.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change142: 364–72. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.027.
104.
VuchicV. R.2002. Urban Public Transportation Systems. Vol.5. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
105.
WaddellP.2007. “UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning.”Journal of the American Planning Association68 (3): 297–314. doi:10.1080/01944360208976274.
WalkerD.2017. The Planners Guide to CommunityViz: The Essential Tool for a New Generation of Planning. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351179768
108.
WangH.-W.PengZ.-R.WangD.MengY.WuT.SunW.LuQ.-C.2020. “Evaluation and Prediction of Transportation Resilience Under Extreme Weather Events: A Diffusion Graph Convolutional Approach.”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies115: Article 102619. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.102619.
WeiH.XuQ.TangX.2011. “A Knowledge-Based Problem Solving Method in GIS Application.”Knowledge-Based Systems24 (4): 542–53. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2011.01.007.
111.
WestphalnK. K.RegoecziW.MasotyaM.Vazquez-WestphalnB.LounsburyK.McDavidL.LeeH.JohnsonJ.RonisS. D.2021. “From Arksey and O’Malley and Beyond: Customizations to Enhance a Team-Based, Mixed Approach to Scoping Review Methodology.”MethodsX8: 101375. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101375.
WuC.YeX.RenF.WanY.NingP.DuQ.2016. “Spatial and Social Media Data Analytics of Housing Prices in Shenzhen, China.”PLoS One11 (10): Article e0164553. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164553.
115.
WuY.ZhangW.ShenJ.MoZ.PengY.2018. “Smart City with Chinese Characteristics against the Background of Big Data: Idea, Action and Risk.”Journal of Cleaner Production173: 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.047.
116.
XiB. D.SuJ.HuangG. H.QinX. S.JiangY. H.HuoS. L.JiD. F.YaoB.2010. “An Integrated Optimization Approach and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting the Waste-Management System of the City of Beijing, China.”Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence23 (4): 620–31. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.002.
117.
YanXiangLiuXinyuZhaoXilei. 2020. “Using Machine Learning for Direct Demand Modeling of Ridesourcing Services in Chicago.”Journal of Transport Geography83: 102661. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102661.
118.
YigitcanlarT.DesouzaK. C.ButlerL.RoozkhoshF.2020. “Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature.”Energies13 (6): Article 1473. doi:10.3390/en13061473.
119.
ZakharenkoR.2016. “Self-driving Cars Will Change Cities.”Regional Science and Urban Economics61: 26–37. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.003.
120.
ZapponeA.Di RenzoM.DebbahM.2019. “Wireless Networks Design in the Era of Deep Learning: Model-Based, AI-Based, or Both?”IEEE Transactions on Communications67 (10): 7331–76. doi:10.1109/tcomm.2019.2924010.
121.
ZhaiW.PengZ.-R.BaiX.2021. “Prototypical Resilience Projects for Postdisaster Recovery Planning: From Theory to Action.”Journal of Planning Education and Research. Epub ahead of print 6 October 2021. doi:10.1177/0739456x211048928.
122.
ZhaiWeiPengZ.-R.YuanFaxi. 2020. “Examine the Effects of Neighborhood Equity on Disaster Situational Awareness: Harness Machine Learning and Geotagged Twitter Data.”International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction48: Article 101611. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101611.
123.
ZhangC.LuY.2021. “Study on Artificial Intelligence: The State of the Art and Future Prospects.”Journal of Industrial Information Integration23: Article 100224. doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100224.
124.
ZhaoL.PengZ.-R.2012. “LandSys: An Agent-Based Cellular Automata Model of Land Use Change Developed for Transportation Analysis.”Journal of Transport Geography25: 35–49. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.07.006.
125.
ZhuLiYuFei RichardWangYigeNingBinTangTao. 2019. “Big Data Analytics in Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Survey.”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems20 (1): 383–98. doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2815678.
