This study explores the changes in the regional growth patterns in the nine largest Canadian Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) between 1990 and 2010. We analyzed whether the metropolitan areas matched the Inside Game (i.e., intensification) with a strong Outside Game (i.e., regional planning) of growth management as represented by physical growth patterns. Overall, Toronto, Vancouver, and London CMAs matched the Inside Game with a strong Outside Game. Conversely, the CMAs of Ottawa, Montreal, Quebec, Calgary, Edmonton, and Winnipeg, where regional governance is fragmented or absent, exhibited signs of regional sprawl. All studied CMAs but Quebec City exhibited signs of intensification.
AnselinLuc. 2004. “Exploring Spatial Data with GeoDaTM : A Workbook.” Urbana: Spatial Analysis Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.”http://www.csiss.org/clearinghouse/GeoDa/geodaworkbook.pdf.
2.
BrewerKirkGrantJill L.2015. “Seeking Density and Mix in the Suburbs: Challenges for Mid-Sized Cities.” Planning Theory & Practice16 (2): 151–68. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1011216.
3.
BunceSusannah. 2004. “The Emergence of ‘Smart Growth’ Intensification in Toronto: Environment and Economy in the New Official Plan.” Local Environment9 (2): 177–91. doi:10.1080/1354983042000199525.
4.
BuntingTrudiFilionPierrePristonHeath. 2000. “Changing Patterns of Residential Centrality : Population and Household Shift in Large Canadian CMAs, 1971-1996.” Cahiers de Géographie du Québec44 (123): 341–61. doi:10.7202/022925ar.
5.
BurchellRobert W.ListokinDavidGalleyCatherine C.2000. “Smart Growth: More than a Ghost of Urban Policy Past, Less than a Bold New Horizon.” Housing Policy Debate11 (4): 821–79. doi:10.1080/10511482.2000.9521390.
BurchfieldMarcyOvermanHenry G.PugaDiegoTurnerMatthew A.2006. “Causes of Sprawl: A Portrait from Space.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics121 (2): 587–633. doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.587.
8.
ChapinTimothy S.2012. “Introduction: From Growth Controls, to Comprehensive Planning, to Smart Growth: Planning’s Emerging Fourth Wave.” Journal of the American Planning Association78 (1): 5–15. doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.645273.
9.
DanielsThomas L.2001. “Smart Growth: A New American Approach to Regional Planning.” Planning Practice and Research16 (3–4): 271–79. doi:10.1080/02697450120107880.
10.
DanielsThomas L.LappingMark. 2005. “Land Preservation: An Essential Ingredient in Smart Growth.” Journal of Planning Literature19 (3): 316–29. doi:10.1177/0885412204271379.
11.
DanielsenKaren A.LangRobert E.FultonWilliam. 1999. “Retracting Suburbia: Smart Growth and the Future of Housing.” Housing Policy Debate10 (3): 513–40. doi:10.1080/10511482.1999.9521341.
12.
DownsAnthony. 2005. “Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More than We Do It.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (4): 367–78. doi:10.1080/01944360508976707.
13.
EdwardsMary M.HainesAnna. 2007. “Evaluating Smart Growth: Implications for Small Communities.” Journal of Planning Education and Research27 (1): 49–64. doi:10.1177/0739456X07305792.
14.
EwingReidPendallRolfChenDon. 2002. Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact. Washington, DC: Smart Growth America.
15.
FilionPierre. 2003. “Towards Smart Growth? The Difficult Implementation of Alternatives to Urban Dispersion.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research12 (1): 48–70.
16.
FilionPierre. 2009. “The Mixed Success of Nodes as a Smart Growth Planning Policy.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36 (3): 505–21. doi:10.1068/b33145.
17.
FilionPierreKramerAnna. 2012. “Transformative Metropolitan Development Models in Large Canadian Urban Areas: The Predominance of Nodes.” Urban Studies49 (10): 2237–64. doi:10.1177/0042098011423565.
18.
FilionPierreLeeMichelleLeanageNelukaHakullKent. 2015. “Planners’ Perspectives on Obstacles to Sustainable Urban Development: Implications for Transformative Planning Strategies.” Planning Practice & Research30 (2): 202–21. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1023079.
19.
FilionPierreMcSpurrenKathleen. 2007. “Smart Growth and Development Reality: The Difficult Co-ordination of Land Use and Transport Objectives.” Urban Studies44 (3): 501–23. doi:10.1080/00420980601176055.
20.
FultonWilliam B.PendallRolfNguyˆẽnMaiHarrisonAlicia. 2001. Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ across the US. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
21.
GalsterGeorgeHansonRoyceRatcliffeMichael R.WolmanHaroldColemanStephenFreihageJason. 2001. “Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept.” Housing Policy Debate12 (4): 681–717.
22.
GelmanAndrew. 2004. “Treatment Effects in Before-After Data.” In Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from an Incomplete Data Perspective, edited by GelmanAndrewMengXiao-Li, 195–202. London: John Wiley. http://stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/gelman.pdf.
23.
GelmanAndrewHillJennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GordonDavid L. A.JanzenMark. 2013. “Suburban Nation? Estimating the Size of Canada’s Suburban Population.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research30 (3): 197–220.
GrantJill. 2002. “Mixed Use in Theory and Practice.” Journal of the American Planning Association68 (1): 71–84.
28.
GrantJill. 2009. “Theory and Practice in Planning the Suburbs: Challenges to Implementing New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Sustainability Principles.” Planning Theory & Practice10 (1): 11–33. doi:10.1080/14649350802661683.
29.
GrantJillFilionPierreLowScott. 2018. “Path Dependencies Affecting Suburban Density, Mix, and Diversity in Halifax: Suburban Path Dependencies.” The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien63:240–53. doi:10.1111/cag.12496.
30.
HanAlbert T.2019a. “Effects of Relaxing the Urban Growth Management Policy: Greenbelt Policy of Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea.” Journal of Planning Education and Research39 (3): 300–314. doi:10.1177/0739456X17739110.
31.
HanAlbert T.2019b. “The Implication of Regional and Local Growth Management Policies on Sprawl: A Case of the Calgary Metropolitan Area.” Journal of Urban Affairs, February41:1103–22. doi:10.1080/07352166.2019.1569467.
32.
ImbensGuido W.WooldridgeJeffrey M.2009. “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature47 (1): 5–86. doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5.
33.
IsinIsinFahriEnginTomaltyRay. 1993. Resettling Cities: Canadian Residential Intensification Initiatives. Canada: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
34.
LandisJohn D.2017. “The End of Sprawl? Not so Fast.” Housing Policy Debate27 (5): 659–97. doi:10.1080/10511482.2017.1296014.
35.
LeffersDonaldBallamingiePatricia. 2013. “Governmentality, Environmental Subjectivity, and Urban Intensification.” Local Environment18 (2): 134–51. doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.719016.
36.
LeoChristopherAndersonKathryn. 2006. “Being Realistic about Urban Growth.” Journal of Urban Affairs28 (2): 169–89.
37.
MilgromRichard. 2011. “Slow Growth versus the Sprawl Machine: Winnipeg, Manitoba.” In In-between Infrastructure: Urban Connectivity in an Age of Vulnerability, edited by YoungDouglasWoodPatricia BurkeKeilRoger, 87–100. Kelowna: Praxis (e)Press.
38.
PaulsenKurt. 2014. “Geography, Policy or Market? New Evidence on the Measurement and Causes of Sprawl (and Infill) in US Metropolitan Regions.” Urban Studies51 (12): 2629–45. doi:10.1177/0042098013512874.
39.
PondDavid. 2009. “Institutions, Political Economy and Land-Use Policy: Greenbelt Politics in Ontario.” Environmental Politics18 (2): 238–56. doi:10.1080/09644010802682619.
40.
QuesnelLouise. 2000. “Municipal Reorganisation in Quebec.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences RégionalesXXIII (1): 115–34.
Statistics Canada. 2017. “Statistics Canada Census Program.” Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.
43.
TaylorZackBurchfieldMarcy. 2010. “Growing Cities: Comparing Urban Growth Patterns and Regional Growth Policies in Calgary, Toronto, and Vancouver.” Toronto: Neptis Foundation.
44.
TaylorZackBurchfieldMarcyKramerAnna. 2014. “Alberta Cities at the Crossroads: Urban Development Challenges and Opportunities in Historical and Comparative Perspective.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2443586. Rochester: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2443586.
45.
TomaltyRay. 2002. “Growth Management in the Vancouver Region.” Local Environment7 (4): 431–45. doi:10.1080/1354983022000027536.
46.
TomaltyRayAlexanderDon. 2005 “Smart Growth in Canada: Implementation of a Planning Concept.” Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation/https://viuspace.viu.ca/handle/10613/2985.
47.
TsenkovaSashaDamianiRose-Mary. 2009. “Urban Sustainability: Learning from Evaluation of Community Plans in Calgary.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research18 (1): 82–106.
48.
WidemanTrevor JamesMasudaJeffrey. 2013. “Intensification and Neoliberalization: A Case Study of Planning Policy in Winnipeg, Canada, 1990-2013.” Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays16: 55–67.
49.
YeLinMandpeSumedhaMeyerPeter B.2005. “What Is ‘Smart Growth?’—Really?” Journal of Planning Literature19 (3): 301–15. doi:10.1177/0885412204271668.
