This study is the first to examine detailed faculty demographics and impacts of elite hiring networks in the planning academy. Institutional prestige significantly shapes faculty placements. Nearly half of planning faculty graduated from Berkeley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Cornell, and University of North Carolina (UNC)-Chapel Hill. Faculty are predominantly hired in similar or lower ranking programs with little upward mobility, after accounting for demographics and program factors. While race and gender did not have a significant relationship to placements, the findings demonstrate how status-based inequities are perpetuated through elite programs and constrain faculty representation.
Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning 1987-88 Committee. 1990. “The Recruitment and Retention of Faculty of Women and Faculty of Color in Planning Education: Survey Results.” Report submitted to ACSP Executive Committee.
2.
Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Task Force on Global Planning Education. 2019. “Building Global Perspectives on Planning Education.” Report submitted to ACSP Executive Committee.
3.
AnselinLucNasarJack L.TalenEmily. 2011. “Where Do Planners Belong? Assessing the Relationships between Planning and Design in American Universities.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (2): 196–207. doi:10.1177/0739456X11402356.
4.
BaldwinAmelia A.LightbodyMargaret G.BrownCarol E.TrinkleBrad S.2012. “Twenty Years of Minority PhDs in Accounting: Signs of Success and Segregation.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting23:298–311.
5.
BarnettGeorge A.DanowskiJames A.FeeleyThomas HughStalkerJordan. 2010. “Measuring Quality in Communication Doctoral Education using Network Analysis of Faculty-Hiring Patterns.” Journal of Communication60 (2): 388–411.
6.
BernalDolores DelgadoVillalpandoOctavio. 2002. “An Apartheid of Knowledge in Academia: The Struggle over the ‘Legitimate’ Knowledge of Faculty of Color.” Equity & Excellence in Education35 (2): 169–80.
7.
BornmannLutzMarxWerner. 2011. “The h Index as a Research Performance Indicator.” European Science Editing37 (3): 77–80.
8.
BornmannLutzMutzRüdigerDanielHans-Dieter. 2008. “Are There Better Indices for Evaluation Purposes Than the h-Index? A Comparison of Nine Different Variants of the h Index Using Data from Biomedicine.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology59 (5): 830–37.
9.
BurrisVal. 2004. “The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks.” American Sociological Review69 (2): 239–64.
10.
CatlinRobert A.1993. “The Planning Profession and Blacks in the United States: A Content Analysis of Academic and Professional Literature.” Journal of Planning Education and Research13 (1): 26–32. doi:10.1177/0739456X9301300105.
11.
ChenEdith Wen-ChuHuneShirley. 2011. “Asian American Pacific Islander Women from Ph.D. to Campus President: Gains and Leaks in the Pipeline.” In Women of Color in Higher Education: Changing Directions and New Perspectives Volume 10, edited by Jean-MarieGaëtaneLloyd-JonesBrenda163–190. Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/S1479-3644(2011)0000010012.
12.
ClausetAaronArbesmanSamuelLarremoreDaniel B.2015. “Systematic Inequality and Hierarchy in Faculty Hiring Networks.” Science Advances1 (1): e1400005.
13.
CrenshawKimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review43 (6): 1241–99.
14.
CroninBlaiseMehoLokman. 2005. “Using the h-index to Rank Influential Information Scientists.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology57:1275–78.
15.
CroomNatasha N.2017. “Promotion beyond Tenure: Unpacking Racism and Sexism in the Experiences of Black Womyn Professors.” The Review of Higher Education40 (4): 557–83.
FlahertyKevin. 2018. “The Leaky Pipeline for Postdocs: A Study of the Time Between Receiving a PhD and Securing a Faculty Job for Male and Female Astronomers.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.01511.
18.
GarcíaIvisJacksonAprilHarwoodStacy A.GreenleeAndrew J.Aujean LeeC.ChrisingerBenjamin. 2021. “Like a Fish Out of Water.” Journal of the American Planning Association87 (1): 108–22. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1777184.
19.
GardnerSusan K.HolleyKarri A.2011. “‘Those Invisible Barriers are Real’: The Progression of First-Generation Students Through Doctoral Education.” Equity & Excellence in Education44 (1): 77–92.
20.
GreenleeAndrew J.JacksonAprilGarcia-ZambranaIvisAujean LeeC.ChrisingerBenjamin. 2022. “Where Are We Going? Where Have We Been?: The Climate for Diversity within Urban Planning Educational Programs.” Journal of Planning Education and Research42:331–349. doi:10.1177/0739456X18815740.
21.
GriffithAmanda L.2010. “Persistence of Women and Minorities in STEM Field Majors: Is it the School that Matters?” Economics of Education Review29 (6): 911–22.
22.
HaminElisabeth M.MarcucciDaniel J.WenningMary V.2000. “The Experience of New Planning Faculty.” Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (1): 88–99. doi:10.1177/073945600128992627.
23.
HartJeni. 2016. “Dissecting a Gendered Organization: Implications for Career Trajectories for Mid-Career Faculty Women in STEM.” The Journal of Higher Education87 (5): 605–34.
HillEdward W.1990. “Increasing Minority Representation in the Planning Professoriate.” Journal of Planning Education and Research9 (2): 139–42.
26.
HirschJorge Eduardo. 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102 (46): 16569–72. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
27.
HuangMu-Hsuan. 2012. “Exploring the h-Index at the Institutional Level: A Practical Application in World University Rankings.” Online Information Review36 (4): 534–47. doi:10.1108/14684521211254059.
28.
InnesJudith E.1993. “Report of the Commission on the Doctorate in Planning to the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning: An Overview.” Journal of Planning Education and Research12 (2): 168–71.
29.
JackAnthony Abraham. 2016. “(No) Harm in Asking: Class, Acquired Cultural Capital, and Academic Engagement at an Elite University.” Sociology of Education89 (1): 1–19.
30.
KawaNicholas C.Clavijo MichelangeliJose A.ClarkJessica L.GinsbergDanielMcCartyChristopher. 2018. “The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology and Its Inequalities.” American Anthropologist121 (1): 14–29.
31.
LangLiqianWangYanChenQinghuaZhengTao. 2019. “University Ranking Based on Faculty Hiring Network with Minimum Weighted Violation Rankings.” International Journal of Modern Physics C30 (7): 1940017.
32.
LarsonRichard C.GhaffarzadeganNarvidXueYi. 2014. “Too Many PhD Graduates or Too Few Academic Job Openings: The Basic Reproductive Number R0 in Academia.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science31 (6): 745–50.
33.
LaytonRebekah L.BrandtPatrick D.FreemanAshalla M.HarrellJessica R.HallJoshua D.SinchMelanieGibbsKenneth. 2016. “Diversity Exiting the Academy: Influential Factors for the Career Choice of Well-Represented and Underrepresented Minority Scientists.” CBE Life Sciences Education15 (3): ar41.
34.
LeeC.AujeanFloresNina M.HomLaureen D.2021. “Learning from Asian Americans: Implications for Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. Published electronically March 31. doi:10.1177/0739456X211006768.
35.
LiuSin-Ning C.BrownStephanie E. V.SabatIsaac E.2019. “Patching the ‘Leaky Pipeline’: Interventions for Women of Color Faculty in STEM Academia.” Archives of Scientific Psychology7 (1): 32–39.
36.
LoweJeffreyChakrabortyArnabForsythAnnGiustiCeciliaGoldsmithBillSandovalGerardoThompsonMichelle. 2016. “Report on Race, Ethnicity, and Foreign Origin data for ACSP, 2016.” Unpublished Report.
37.
LoweJeffreyForsythAnnGiustiCeciliaGoldsmithBillKamelNabilHyung KimDoSanchezTomShenQingThompsonMichelleWagnerJacob, et al. 2018. “Report on Race, Ethnicity, and Foreign Origin Data for ACSP, 2018.” Unpublished Report.
38.
LundBrady. 2019. “Examination of Correlates of h-index as a Measure of Research Productivity for Library and Information Science Faculty in the United States and Canada.” Scientometrics120:897–915. doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03152-6.
39.
MaiBoLiuJiayingGonzález-BailónSandra. 2015. “Network Effects in the Academic Market: Mechanisms for Hiring and Placing PhDs in Communication (2007–2014).” Journal of Communication65 (3): 558–83. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/10.1111/jcom.121.
40.
MasuokaNatalieGrofmanBernardFeldScott L.2007. “The Production and Placement of Political Science PhDs, 1902-2000.” PS: Political Science and Politics40 (2): 361–66. doi:10.1017/S1049096507070576.
41.
MeyersMarc AndreQuanHaocheng. 2017. “The Use of the h-Index to Evaluate and Rank Academic Departments.” Journal of Materials Research and Technology6 (4): 304–11. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.09.004.
42.
MilemJeffrey F.UmbachPaul D.LiangChristopher T. H.2004. “Exploring the Perpetuation Hypothesis: The Role of Colleges and Universities in Desegregating Society.” Journal of College Student Development45 (6): 688–700. doi:10.1353/csd.2004.0070.
43.
MorenoJosé F.SmithDaryl G.Clayton-PedersenAlma R.ParkerSharonTeraguchiDaniel Hiroyuki. 2006. The Revolving Door for Underrepresented Minority Faculty in Higher Education: An Analysis from the Campus Diversity Initiative. San Francisco: The James Irvine Foundation.
44.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2019. “Average Salary of Full-Time Instructional Faculty on 9-Month Contracts in Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions, by Academic Rank, Control and Level of Institution, and Sex: Selected Years, 1970-71 through 2018-19.” https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_316.10.asp.
NevinAndrew D.2019. “Academic Hiring Networks and Institutional Prestige: A Case Study of Canadian Sociology.” Canadian Review of Sociology56 (3): 389–420.
49.
NiebanckPaul L.1988. “Planning Education: Unleashing the Future.” Journal of the American Planning Association54 (4): 432–42.
50.
NorrisMichaelOppenheimCharles. 2009. “The h-Index: A Broad Review of a New Bibliometric Indicator.” Journal of Documentation66 (5): 681–705.
51.
PattonTracey O.2004. “In the Guise of Civility: The Complicitous Maintenance of Inferential Forms of Sexism Racism in Higher Education.” Women’s Studies in Communication27 (1): 60–87.
52.
PinheiroDiogo L.MelkersJuliaNewtonSunni. 2017. “Take Me Where I Want to Go: Institutional Prestige, Advisor Sponsorship, and Academic Career Placement Preferences.” PLOS ONE12 (5): e0176977. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176977.
PojaniDorinaOlvera-GarciaJaimeSipeNeilByrneJason. 2018. “Research Productivity of Australian Planning Academics: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Journal of Planning Education and Research42:90–101. doi:10.1177/0739456X18804330.
56.
PosseltJulieHernandezTheresa E.VillarrealCynthia D.RodgersAireale J.IrwinLaureen N.2020. “Evaluation and Decision Making in Higher Education: Toward Equitable Repertoires of Faculty Practice.” Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research35:1–63.
57.
SáenzVictor B.NgaiHoi NingHurtadoSylvia. 2007. “Factors Influencing Positive Interactions Across Race for African American, Asian American, Latino, and White College Students.” Research in Higher Education45 (1): 1–38. doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9026-3.
SanchezThomas W.2017. “Faculty Performance Evaluation Using Citation Analysis: An Update.” Journal of Planning Education and Research37 (1): 83–94. doi:10.1177/0739456X16633500.
ShuYoungjunYanErjiaSongMin. 2016. “Understanding the Evolving Academic Landscape of Library and Information Science through Faculty Hiring Data.” Scientometrics108:1461–78.
64.
SmithAnnie. 2013. It’s Not Because You’re Black: Addressing Issues of Racism and Underrepresentation of African Americans in Academia. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
65.
SmithThomas E.JacobsK.S.OsteenP.J.Edison CarterT.2018. “Comparing the Research Productivity of Social Work Doctoral Programs using the h-Index.” Scientometrics116:1513–30. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2832-5.
66.
StevensMark R.ParkKeunhyunTianGuangKimKeuntaeEwingReid. 2022. “Why Do Some Articles in Planning Journals Get Cited More than Others?” Journal of Planning Education and Research42:442–463. doi:10.1177/0739456X19827083.
67.
SweitzerKyleFredericks VolkweinJ.2009. “Prestige among Graduate and Professional Schools: Comparing the U.S. News’ Graduate School Reputation Ratings between Disciplines.” Research in Higher Education50:812–36. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9140-0.
TerviöMark. 2011. “Divisions within Academia: Evidence from Faculty Hiring and Placement.” Review of Economics and Statistics93 (3): 1053–62. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00108.
70.
ThomasJune Manning. 1996. “Educating Planners: Unified Diversity for Social Action.” Journal of Planning Education and Research15:171–82.
71.
TorresKimberly. 2009. “‘Culture Shock’: Black Student Accounts for their Distinctiveness at an Elite College.” Ethnic and Racial Studies32 (5): 883–905.
72.
TurnerCaroline Sotello ViernesGonzalezJuan CarlosLuke WoodJ.2008. “Faculty of Color in Academe: What 20 Years of Literature Tells Us.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education1 (3): 139–68.
73.
WarikooNatasha K.2016. The Diversity Bargain: And Other Dilemmas of Race, Admissions, and Meritocracy at Elite Universities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
WeberMax. 1968 [1921/1922]. Economy and Society. 2 Volumes. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
75.
WhittakerJ. A.MontgomeryB. L.2014. “Cultivating Institutional Transformation and Sustainable STEM Diversity in Higher Education through Integrative Faculty Development.” Innovative Higher Education39 (4): 263–75.
76.
WigginsAndreaAdamicLadaMcQuaidMichael. 2008. “The Small Worlds of Academic Hiring Networks.” Paper presented at Third Annual iSchools Conference, Los Angeles, California, February 28, 2008.
77.
WilliamsRashad. 2020. “From Racial to Reparative Planning: Confronting the White Side of Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. Published electronically August 5. doi:10.1177/0739456X20946416.
78.
WubnehMulatu. 2011. “Commentary: Diversity and Minority Faculty Perception of Institutional Climate of Planning Schools—Results from the Climate Survey.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (3): 340–50.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
