Rental housing was historically a minimal feature of urban informality. Now it is surging amid municipal attempts to “upgrade” informal settlements in São Paulo, Brazil. Drawing upon a mixed-methodological study of two favelas on São Paulo’s east side, we analyze how cycles of upgrading shape informal rental housing at the urban, community, block, and parcel levels, providing detailed comparative data for 2010–2020. Our findings suggest that rental housing redevelopment can increase precarity in urban living, but is an important source of low-income housing in already built-up and “consolidated” settlements where access is declining. Our study emphasizes the need for scholars, policy makers, and planners to further explore the praxis of informal renting and rental housing, which can be effective conduits for channeling public investments across consolidated informal settlements and into individual dwellings.
Al-SayyadN.RoyA., eds. 2003. Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Boulder: Lexington Books.
2.
AntequeraF.BaqaiA.EinkaufG.LosoyaJ.MurdochK.2020. “Low-Income Renting and Sharing in Latin American and Caribbean Cities: Towards a Policy Agenda.” Working Paper. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
3.
AzharA.ButtreyH.WardP. M.2021. “‘Slumification’ of Consolidated Informal Settlements: A Largely Unseen Challenge.” Current Urban Studies9 (2): 315–42.
4.
BaiocchiG.HellerP.SilvaM.2011. Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5.
BaqaiA.WardP. M.2020. “Renting and Sharing in Low-Income Informal Settlements: Lacunae in Research and Policy Challenges.” Current Urban Studies8:456–83.
6.
BlancoA.2013. 10 razones por las cuales el alquiler es vital para los sistemas de vivienda en América Latina y el Caribe (y 10 ideas para dinamizar el mercado) [Ten reasons why rental housing opportunies are essential in Latin America and the Caribbean (as well as 10 ideas to stimulate the market)]. Washington, DC: International Development Bank.
7.
BlancoA.CibilsV. F.MuñozA.2014. Rental Housing Wanted: Policy Options for Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: International Development Bank.
8.
BondukiN.1998. Origens Da Habitação Social No Brasil. Arquitetura Moderna, Lei do Inquilinato e Difusão da Casa Própria. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade.
9.
BondukiN.AndradeC. R. M.RossettoR.1993. Arquitetura e Habitação Social em São Paulo, 1989–1992. [Arquitecture and Social Housing in São Paulo, 1989-1992]. São Paulo: Secretária de Habitaçao e Desenvolvimento.
10.
Chapa Civic Data Lab. 2016. “Project Website.” www.chapa.io.
CoelhoE.PascarelliL.2011. “Using Information Systems and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Geological Risk Management in São Paulo.” Proceedings of the Second World Landslide Forum, October 9, Rome.
13.
DasA.KingR.2019. “Surabaya: The Legacy of Participatory Upgrading of Informal Settlements.” World Resources Report Case Study. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
14.
del RioV.SiembiedaL.2009. Contemporary Urbanism in Brazil: Beyond Brasília. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
15.
DenaldiR.2003. “Slum Upgrading Policies: Evolution and Challenges.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of São Paulo, São Paulo.
16.
DenaldiR.MorettiR.PaivaC.NogueiraF.PetrarolliJ.2016. “Slum Upgrading in the ABC Region in the Context of the Accelerated Growth Program – Upgrading of Informal Settlements.” Cadernos Metropole18 (35): 101–18.
17.
EdwardsM.1982. “The Political Economy of Low-Income Housing: New Evidence from Urban Colombia.” Bulletin of Latin American Research1:45–62.
18.
FederighiV.2017. The Informal Stance: Representations of Urban Design and Informal Settlements. New York: Applied Research and Design.
19.
FelipeJ.1997. Mutirão and Autogestão in Jardim São Francisco (1989 – 1992): Housing Movements and the Role of the Architect. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of São Paulo, São Carlos.
20.
FernandesE.1993. “The Legal Regularization of ‘Favelas’ in Brazil: The Case of Belo Horizonte.” Social & Legal Studies2:211–36.
21.
FernandesE.2007. “Constructing a Right to the City in Brazil.” Social & Legal Studies16:201–19.
22.
FreemanJ.BurgosM.2016. “Accumulation by Forced Removal: The Thinning of Rio de Janeiro’s Favelas in Preparation for the Games.” Journal of Latin American Studies49:549–77.
GilbertA.2001. “Housing in Latin America.” Working Paper Series 1–7UE. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
25.
GilbertA.2003. Rental Housing: An Essential Option for the Urban Poor in Developing Countries. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
26.
GilbertA.2007. “The Return of the Slum: Does Language Matter?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research31 (4): 697–713.
27.
GilbertA.2016. “Rental Housing: The International Experience.” Habitat International54 (3): 173–81.
28.
GilbertA.WardP. M.1985. Housing, the State, and the Poor: Policy and Practice in Three Latin American Cities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GulyaniS.TalukdarD.BassettE.2018. “A Sharing Economy? Unpacking Demand and Living Conditions in the Urban Housing Market in Kenya.” World Development109:57–72.
30.
GygerH.2017. Improvised Cities: Architecture, Urbanization, and Innovation in Peru. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press.
31.
HABISP Online Mapping Information System. 2008. Geospatial Dataset of Informal Settlements. São Paulo: HABISP.
32.
HallP.2014. Cities of Tomorrow. Malden: Blackwell.
33.
HarrisR.2018. “Modes of Informal Development: A Global Phenomenon.” Journal of Planning Literature33 (3): 267–86.
34.
HeikkilaE. J.HartenJ.2019. “Can Land Use Regulation Be Smarter? Planners’ Role in the Informal Housing Challenge.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:10.1177/0739456X19880272.
35.
HuchzermeyerM.2004. Unlawful Occupation: Informal Settlements and Urban Policy in South Africa and Brazil. Trenton: Africa World Press.
36.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. 2000. “Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics].” https://www.ibge.gov.br
37.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. 2010. “Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics].” https://www.ibge.gov.br
38.
JiménezE. R.SierraA. Camargo. 2015. “Rental Markets and Housing Policies in Consolidated Informal Settlements.” In Housing Policy in Latin American Cities: A New Generation of Strategies and Approaches for 2016 UN-Habitat III, edited by WardP. M.JiménezE.Di VirgilioM., 283–305. New York: Routledge.
39.
KowarickL.AntC.1988. “Cem Anos de Promiscuidade: O Cortiço na Cidade de São Paulo [One Hundred Years of Promiscuity: The Tenement in the City of São Paulo].” In As Lutas Sociais e a Cidade: São Paulo Passado e Presente [Social Struggles and the City: São Paulo Past and Present], edited by KowarickL., 73–93São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
40.
KrähenbüelL.1996. Cingapura: O Encontro de São Paulo com a Cidadania [Cingapura: São Paulo’s Encounter with Citizenship]. São Paulo: Bix Design Corporativo Editora.
41.
KumarS.1996. “Landlordism in Third World Urban Low-Income Settlements: A Case for Further Research.” Urban Studies33 (4–5): 753–82.
42.
KumarS.2011. “The Research-Policy Dialectic: A Critical Reflection on the Virility of Landlord-Tenant Research and the Impotence of Housing Policy Formulation in the Urban Global South.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action16 (5): 662–73.
43.
LaquianA.1984. Basic Housing Policies for Urban Sites, Services, and Shelter in Developing Countries. Ottawa: International Development Research.
44.
MaricatoE.2003. “Conhecer Para Resolver a Cidade Ilegal [Understand to Resolve the Illegal City].” In Urbanização Brasileira: Redescobertas, edited by CastriotaL. B., 78–96. Belo Horizonte: Editora Arte.
45.
MayneA.2017. Slums: The History of a Global Injustice. London: Reaktion Books.
46.
McTarnaghanS.2015. “Expulsos de la Ciudad: Spatial Dynamics of Neoliberal Housing Policy in Chile and Brazil.” Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas.
47.
MethP.2013. “Millennium Development Goals and Urban Informal Settlements: Unintended Consequences.” International Development Planning35 (1): v–xiii.
48.
MethP.ButheleziS.RajaskkharS.2019. “Gendered Il/Legalities of Housing Formalization in India and South Africa.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space51 (5): 1068–88.
49.
NaikM.2015. “Informal Rental Housing Typologies and Experiences of Low-Income Migrant Renters in Gurgaon, India.” Environment and Urbanization Asia6 (2): 154–75.
50.
OwensK. E.GulyaniS.RizviA.2018. “Success When We Deemed It Failure? Revisiting Sites and Services Projects in Mumbai and Chennai 20 Years Later.” World Development106:260–72.
51.
PasternakS.D’OttavianoC.2014. “Half a Century of Self-Help in Brazil.” In Affordable in the Urban Global South: Seeking Sustainable Solutions, edited by BredenoordJ.Van LindertP.SmetsP., 241–55. London: Routledge.
52.
PeekO.HordijkM.d’AuriaV.2018. “User-Based Design for Inclusive Urban Transformation: Learning from ‘Informal’ and ‘Formal’ Dwelling Practices in Guayaquil, Ecuador.” International Journal of Housing Policy18 (2): 204–32.
53.
PerezL. P.dos SantosR. B.de AlmeidaG. M. J. A.CarvalhoG. C.2017. “Spatial Data in the Global South: A Case Study of Alternative Land Management Tools for Cities with Limited Resources.” IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, October.
54.
PerlmanJ.1976. The Myth of Marginality: Urban Poverty and Politics in Rio de Janeiro. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
PerlmanJ.2010. Favela: Four Decades of Living on the Edge of Rio de Janeiro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios. 2018. “Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios [Brazilian National Household Survey].” National Household Survey.
57.
PortesA.1972. “Rationality in the Slums: An Essay on Interpretive Sociology.” Comparative Studies in Society and History14:268–86.
58.
PortesA.1979. “Housing Policy, Urban Poverty, and the State: The Favelas of Rio de Janeiro, 1972-76.” Latin American Research Review14:3–24.
59.
RojasD.WardP. M.2015. “Rehab, ‘Los Aires’ and Densification of Consolidated Settlements in Lima, Peru.” In Housing Policy in Latin American Cities: A New Generation of Strategies and Approaches for 2016 UN-Habitat III, edited by WardP. M.JiménezE.Di VirgilioM., 283–305. New York: Routledge.
60.
RolnikR.2007. A Cidade e a Lei: Legislação, Política Urbana, e Territórios na Cidade de São Paulo [The City and the Law: Legislation, Urban Policy, and Territories in the City of São Paulo]. São Paulo: The São Paulo Research Foundation.
61.
RolnikR.2011. “Democracy on the Edge: Limits and Possibilities in the Implementation of an Urban Reform Agenda in Brazil.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35 (2): 239–55.
62.
RossettoR.1993. “Organismos Internacionais E Autoconstrução: Análise E Reflexões Sobre as Politicas de Habitação Para a População Da Baixa Renda [International Agencies and Autoconstruction: Analysis and Reflections Above Housing Policy for the Low-Income Population].” Master’s thesis, University of São Paulo, São Paulo.
63.
RoyA.2005. “Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 147–58.
64.
RoyA.2009. “Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities: Informality, Insurgence, and the Idiom of Urbanization.” Planning Theory8 (2): 76–87.
65.
SampaioM. R. A.2007. “O Cortiço Paulistano Entre Ciências Sociais E Política [The São Paulo Tenement Between Social Sciences and Policy].” Revista Do IEB44:125–39.
66.
SantoroP.2016. “Levantamento das Situações de Moradia Precária na Operação Urbana Consorciada Bairros do Tamanduateí [Documentation of Precarious Housing Conditions in the Urban Operation Consortium ‘Neighborhoods of Tamanduateí’].” Final Report, University of São Paulo, São Paulo.
67.
SchebaA.TurokI.2020. “Informal Rental Housing in the South: Dynamic but Neglected.” Environment and Urbanization32 (1): 109–32.
68.
Secretária de Habitação [Secretariat of Housing]. 2008. HABISP: Mapeando a Habitação na Cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo: Prefeitura de São Paulo.
69.
Secretária de Habitação [Secretariat of Housing]. 2012. O Urbanismo nas Preexistências Territoriais e o Compartilhamento de Ideias. São Paulo: Prefeitura de São Paulo.
70.
ShirgaokarM.RumbachA.2018. “Investigating Housing Tenures Beyond Homeownership: A Study of Informal Settlements in Kolkata, India.” Housing Studies33 (1): 117–39.
71.
StiphanyK.2019a. “Mutirão: The Architecture of Agency.” Journal of Architectural Education73 (2): 258–60.
72.
StiphanyK.2019b. “Rentscapes: Emerging Patterns of Informality in São Paulo, Brazil.” American Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Conference, October, Greenville.
73.
StiphanyK. 2021. “Infrastructural Insurgency: Constructing Situated Data at Brazil’s Urban Periphery.” PlanNext Next Generation Planning Journal.
74.
StiphanyK.WegmannJ.2020. “From Owner-Occupant to Senhorio: The Microeconomics of Rentrification in São Paulo.” American Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Conference, November, Toronto.
75.
TurokI.Borel-SaladinJ.2016. “Backyard Shacks, Informality and the Urban Housing Crisis in South Africa: Stopgap or Prototype Solution?” Housing Studies31 (4): 384–409.
76.
ValeL.2000. From the Puritans to the Projects: Public Housing and Public Neighbors. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
77.
WalkerA. M. P.2015. “Self-Help or Public Housing? Lessons from a Co-managed Slum Upgrading via Participatory Budget.” Habitat International55:58–66.
78.
WardP. M.JiménezE.Di VirgilioM.2014. “Intensive Case Study Methodology for the Analysis of Self-Help Housing Consolidation, Household Organization and Family Mobility.” Current Urban Studies2 (2): 88–104.
79.
WardP. M.JiménezE.Di VirgilioM.2015. Housing Policy in Latin American Cities: A New Generation of Strategies and Approaches for 2016 UN-Habitat III. New York: Routledge.
80.
WegmannJ.2015. “Research Notes: The Hidden Cityscapes of Informal Housing in Suburban Los Angeles and the Paradox of Horizontal Density.” Buildings and Landscapes: Journal of Vernacular Architecture Form22 (2): 89–110.
81.
WegmannJ.MawhorterS.2017. “Measuring Informal Housing Production in California Cities.” Journal of the American Planning Association83 (2): 119–30.
82.
WerlinH.1999. “The Slum Upgrading Myth.” Urban Studies36 (9): 1523–34.
83.
WilliamsS.2020. Data Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
84.
WykeT.RobsonB.DodgeM.2018. Manchester: Mapping the City. Edinburgh: Birlinn General.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
