Two episodes of roadway planning in New York City—the 1937 Henry Hudson Parkway construction and the 2018 congestion pricing legislation—show the dangers and productive possibilities that result when planners “frame” problems as to be resolved by the choices of either experts or individual urban residents. Framing planning as a matter of choices is a reductive dualism that ignores the intellectual, material, and networked relationships that “overflow” such narrow conceptions. Planners and advocates seeking to intervene in choice frames, from Jane Jacobs to congestion pricing advocates, have repurposed metaphors, technology, and scale to link individuals with community, mobility with environmentalism, and planning with politics.
ArnottRichardAtkinsonPaulArrowKennethDrèzeJacques, eds. 1997. Public Economics: William Vickrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BeauregardRobert. 2012. “Planning with Things.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (2): 182–90.
4.
BeauregardRobert. 2015. Planning Matter: Acting with Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BlackAlan. 1990. “The Chicago Area Transportation Study: A Case Study of Rational Planning.” Journal Planning Education and Research10 (1): 27–37.
6.
BowkerGeoffreyStarSusan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
7.
BoyerChristine M.1983. Dreaming the Rational City. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
8.
BrodskyRichard. 2007. Interim Report: An Inquiry into Congestion Pricing Proposed in PlaNYC 2030 and S.6068. Albany, NY: New York State Assembly, Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions.
9.
BrownWendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Brooklyn: Zone Books.
10.
BurginAngus. 2012. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11.
BurnhamDanielBennettEdward. 1909. Plan of Chicago, Centennial Edition. Chicago, IL: Great Books Foundation.
12.
CallonMichel. 1998. “An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology.” In The Laws of the Market, edited by CallonM., 244–70. London: Blackwell Publishing.
13.
CaroRobert. 1974. The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York. New York: Knopf.
14.
ChristinPierreBalezOlivier. 2014. Robert Moses: Master Builder of New York City. Poland: NoBrow.
15.
Committee on Regional Plan and Its Environs. 1929. Regional Plan of New York and It’s Environs. Philadelphia, PA: William F. Pell Co. Printers.
16.
ConnerlyCharles. 2002. “From Racial Zoning to Community Empowerment: The Interstate Highway System and the African American Community in Birmingham, Alabama.”Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (2): 99–114.
17.
DavidoffPaul. 1965. “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning.”Journal of the American Institute of Planners31 (4): 331–8.
18.
DavidoffPaulReinerThomas. 1962. “A Choice Theory of Planning.”Journal of the American Institute of Planners28 (2): 103–15.
19.
FlyvbjergBent. 1998. Rationality and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
FogelsonRobert. 2005. Bourgeois Nightmares: Suburbia, 1870-1930. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
FungArchonGrahamMaryWeilDavid. 2007. Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GrahamOtis L.1976. Towards a Planned Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
GrahamStephenMarvinSimon. 2001. Splintering Urbanism. New York: Routledge.
HallPeter. 2002. Cities of Tomorrow. 3rd ed.Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
26.
HancockJohn. 1967. “Planners in the Changing American City.”Journal of the American Institute of Planners33 (5): 290–304.
27.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
HaydenDolores. 1980. “What Would a Non-Sexist City Be like? Speculations on Housing, Urban Design and Human Work.” Journal of Women in Culture and Society5 (Suppl. 3): S170–87.
29.
HaydenDolores. 1986. Redesigning the American Dream. New York: W.W. Norton.
30.
HommelsAnique. 2008. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
IaconoMichaelLevinsonDavidEl-GeneidyAhmed. 2008. “Models of Transportation and Land Use Change: A Guide to the Territory.” Journal of Planning Literature22 (4): 233–40.
33.
JacobsJane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
RiveroJuanTeresaBenjaminWestJohn. 2017. “Locating Rationalities in Planning: Market Thinking and Its Others in the Spaces, Institutions and Materials of Contemporary Urban Governance.”Urban Geography38 (2): 174–76. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1206703.
50.
RodgersDaniel. 2011. The Age of Fracture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
51.
RothsteinRichard. 2017. The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America. New York: W.W. Norton.
SandercockLeonie. 1998. “Framing Insurgent Historiographies of Planning.” In Making The Invisible Visible, edited by SandercockLeonie, 1–23. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54.
SandercockLeonie. 2003a. “Dreaming the Sustainable City.” In Story and Sustainability: Planning, Practice and Possibility for American Cities, edited by Barbara Eckstein and James Throgmorton, 153–64. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
55.
SandercockLeonie. 2003b. “Out of the Closet: The Importance of Stories and Storytelling in Planning Practice.” Planning Theory & Practice4 (1): 11–28.
56.
SandercockLeonie. 2004. “Towards a Planning Imagination for the 21st Century.” Journal of the American Planning Association70 (2): 133–41.
57.
SchönDonald. 1982. “Some of What a Planner Knows.”Journal of the American Planning Association48 (3): 351–64.
58.
SchönDonaldReinMartin. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
ScottJames. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
61.
ShoreChrisWrightSusan. 2008. “Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education.” In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, edited by StrathernM., 57–89. New York: Routledge.
62.
SitesWilliam. 2003. Remaking New York: Primitive Globalization and the Politics of Urban Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
StrathernMarilyn. 2000. “Introduction.” In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, edited by StrathernMarilyn, 1–18. New York: Routledge.
65.
ThalerRichard S.SunsteinCass R.2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New York: Penguin Books.
66.
van MaasakkersMattijs. 2021. “What Role Does Planning Have in the Creation of Ecosystem Service Markets? Evidence from Two Cases in Oregon.” Journal of Planning Education and Research41 (1): 18–31. doi:10.1177/0739456X18773502.
67.
VickreyWilliam. 1969. “Congestion Theory and Transport Investment.” American Economic Association59 (2): 251–60.
WeberMax. 2002/1905. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by BaehrPeterWellsGordin. New York: Penguin.
70.
WeinerEdward. 1999. Urban Transportation Planning in the United States: An Historical Overview. Revised and Expanded. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
71.
WestJohn. 2015. “Translation: William Vickrey and the Remaking of Transportation Knowledge Infrastructure.” In Planning for a Material World. Research in Planning and Urban Design. Edited by BeauregardRobertLietoLaura, 73–89. New York: Routledge.
72.
WestJohn.2017. “Data, Democracy and School Accountability: Controversy over School Evaluation in the Case of DeVasco High School.” Big Data & Society, 4 (1). doi:10.1177/2053951717702408.
73.
ZippSamuel. 2012. Manhattan Projects: The Rise and Fall of Urban Renewal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
ZupanJeffreyPerrottaAlexis. 2003. An Exploration of Motor Vehicle Congestion Pricing in New York. New York: Regional Plan Association.
