Charrettes are a useful tool to facilitate stakeholder discussion and generate useful end products to address regional issues. To identify regional environmental and sustainability issues, we held a series of interdisciplinary charrettes with stakeholders that shared a similar concern toward protecting the region. Outcomes included distinguishing exemplary sites representative of the issues on a base map and developing initial action items to address them. We present our lessons learned and provide recommendations to assist others in planning and implementing interdisciplinary charrettes.
AllenElizabethKrugerChadLeungFok-YanStephensJennie C.2013. “Diverse Perceptions of Stakeholder Engagement within an Environmental Modeling Research Team.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Science3:343–56.
2.
AndersonJoan B.GerberJames. 2008. Fifty Years of Change on the US-Mexico Border: Growth, Development, and Quality of Life. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
ArchibaldMandy M.AmbagtsheerRachel C.CaseyMavourneen G.LawlessMichael. 2019. “Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods18:1–8.
4.
BeckleyThomasParkinsJohn R.SheppardStephen R. J.2005. Public Participation in Sustainable Forest Management: A Reference Guide. Edmonton: Sustainable Forest Management Network.
5.
BernardH. Russell. 2011. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
BuckleyT. J.LiddleJ.AshleyD. L.PaschalD. C.BurseV. W.NeedhamL. L.AklandG.1997. “Environmental and Biomarker Measurements in Nine Homes in the Lower Rio Grande Valley: Multimedia Results for Pesticides, Metals, PAHs, and VOCs.” Environmental International23:705–32.
8.
CameronJenny. 2016. “Focusing on the Focus Group.” In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, edited by HayI., 4th ed., 83–102. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
9.
ChambersWilliam T.1930. “Lower Rio Grande Valley.” Economic Geography6:364–73.
10.
ChangNi-BinDavilaEric. 2008. “Municipal Solid Waste Characterization and Management Strategies for the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas.” Waste Management28:776–94.
11.
CondonPatrick M.2012. Design Charrettes for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
CundyA. B.BardosR. P.ChurchAndrewPuschenreiterM.Friesl-HanlW.MüllerI.NeuS.MenchMichelWittersNeleVangronsveldJaco. 2013. “Developing Principles of Sustainability and Stakeholder Engagement for ‘Gentle’ Remediation Approaches: The European Context.” Journal of Environmental Management129:283–91.
13.
CusterThomas W.MitchellChristine A.1987. “Exposure to Insecticides of Brushland Wildlife within the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas, USA.” Environmental Pollution45:207–20.
14.
DaviesAnna R.1999. “Where Do We Go from Here? Environmental Focus Groups and Planning Policy Formation.” Local Environment4:295–316.
15.
EllensonWilliam D.MukerjeeShaibalStevensRobert K.WillisRobert D.ShadwickDouglas S.SomervilleMatthew C.LewisRobert G.1997. “An Environmental Scoping Study in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas-II. Assessment of Transboundary Pollution Transport and other Activities by Air Quality Monitoring.” Environmental International23:643–55.
FraserEvan D. G.DougillAndrew J.MabeeWarren E.ReedMarkMcAlpinePatrick. 2006. “Bottom Up and Top Down: Analysis of Participatory Processes for Sustainability Indicator Identification as a Pathway to Community Empowerment and Sustainable Environmental Management.” Journal of Environmental Management78:114–27.
18.
GaddisErica J. BrownFalkHillary HarpGingerClareVoinovAlexey. 2010. “Effectiveness of a Participatory Modeling Effort to Identify and Advance Community Water Resource Goals in St. Albans, Vermont.” Environmental Model Software25:1428–38.
19.
GarciaS. S.AkeC.ClementB.HuebnerH. J.DonnellyK. C.ShalaS. L.2001. “Initial Results of Environmental Monitoring in the Texas Rio Grande Valley.” Environmental International26:465–74.
20.
GirlingCynthiaKellettRonaldJohnstoneShana. 2006. “Informing Design Charrettes: Tools for Participation in Neighbourhood-Scale Planning.” Journal of Integrated Assessment6:109–30.
21.
GuestGregNameyEmilyMcKennaKevin. 2017. “How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes.” Field Methods29:3–22.
22.
HackettEdward J.RhotenDiana R.2009. “The Snowbird Charrette: Integrative Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Environmental Research Design.” Minerva47:407–40.
23.
HajkowiczStefan A.2008. “Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Environmental Decisions.” Journal of Environmental Management88:607–14.
24.
HoqueNazrul. 2014. Projections of the Population of Texas and Counties in Texas by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050. Houston: Hobby Center for Public Policy, University of Houston.
25.
LammHarrietRamirezDavidRenJianhong. 2014. “Introduction to Environmental and Sustainability Issues in the South Texas-Mexico Border Region.” In Environmental Sustainability Issues in the South Texas-Border Region, edited by RamirezD.RenJ.JonesK. D.LammH., 1–10. New York: Springer.
26.
LautenschlagerR. A.1998. “From Rhetoric To Reality: Using Specific Environmental Concerns to Identify Critical Sustainability Issues.” Ecosystems1:176–82.
27.
LennertzBillLutzenhiserAarin. 2006. “A Charrette Is the Best Way to Share.” Planning72:44–47.
28.
LennertzBillLutzenhiserAarin. 2017. The Charrette Handbook. New York: Routledge.
29.
LennertzBillLutzenhiserAarinFailorTamara. 2008. “An Introduction to Charrettes.” Journal of Planning Communication71:1–3.
30.
LeonardRobert I.JuddFrank W.1993. “Phytogeography of the Woody Flora of the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas.” Texas Journal of Science45:133–47.
31.
LeslieDavid M.Jr., ed. 2016. “An International Borderland of Concern—Conservation of Biodiversity in the Lower Rio Grande Valley.” Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5078. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey.
32.
LindseyGailToddJoel AnnHayterSheila J.2003. Handbook for Planning and Conducting Charrettes for High-Performance Projects. No NREL/BK-710-33425. Golden: National Renewable Energy Lab.
33.
LonghurstRobyn. 2016. “Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Groups.” In Key Methods in Geography, edited by CliffordN.CopeM.GillespieTFrenchS., 3rd ed., 143–56. Los Angeles: SAGE.
34.
LópezJosé Jaoquín. 2006. “Dynamic Growth in the Rio Grande Valley.” Southwest Economy2006:11–14.
35.
MalstromHoward A.JordanWayne R.1994. Environmental Issues of the US-Mexico Border Region: A Workshop Summary. TR-166. College Station: Texas Water Resource Institute, Texas A&M University.
36.
MathisMichelleMatisoffDaniel. 2004. A Characterization of Ecotourism in the Texas Lower Rio Grande Valley. Discussion Paper VNT-04-01. Houston: Houston Advanced Research Center.
37.
Mejia-VelazquezGerado M.Rodriguez-GallegosMaricruz. 1997. “Characteristics and Estimated Air Pollutant Emissions from Fuel Burning by the Industry and Vehicles in the Matamoros-Reynosa Border Region.” Environment International23:733–44.
38.
MoraMiguel A.LaackLinda L.LeeM. ClareSericanoJosePresleyRobertGardinaliPiero R.GambleLawrence R.RobertsonStephenFrankDonell. 2000. “Environmental Contaminants in Blood, Hair, and Tissues of Ocelots from the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas, 1986–1997.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessments64:477–92.
39.
MukerjeeShaibalShadwickDouglas S.DeanKirk E.CarmichaelLinda Y.BowserJon J.1999. Lower Rio Grande Valley Transboundary Air Pollution Project (TAPP). EPA/600/R-99/047 (NTIS PB99-146938). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
40.
PalmerJasmine S.ChiverallsKeriPullenStephenZuoJianWilsonLouZillanteGeorge. 2013. “Transdisciplinary Charrettes: A Research Method for Sustainable Design.” International Journal of Architecture Spatial Environmental Design7:95–106.
41.
PaulWilliam G.1999. “The Electronic Charrette: Internet Tools For Participatory Planning.” In Proceedings of WebNet 99: World Conference on the WWW and Internet, edited by DeBraP.LeggettJ. J., 855–59. Honolulu: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
42.
ReedMark S.2008. “Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review.” Biological Conservation141:2417–31.
43.
RinnerClausBirdMichelle. 2009. “Evaluating Community Engagement through Argumentation Maps—A Public Participation GIS Case Study.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36:588–601.
44.
RoggemaRob, ed. 2014. The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures. New York: Springer.
45.
RyanD. E.BrownN. W.MiddletonJ. K.2008. “Wikiplanning™: The Virtual Design Charrette.” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment117:517–26.
46.
SanoffHenry. 2000. Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. New York: John Wiley.
47.
SchoolmasterF. Andrew. 2010. “Water Marketing and Water Rights Transfers in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas.” The Professional Geographer43:292–304.
48.
SpradleyJames P.1979. The Ethnographic Interview. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
49.
SummyK. R.Morales-RamosJ. A.KingE. G.1992. “Ecology and Potential Impact of Catolaccus Grandis (Burks) on Boll Weevil Infestations in the Lower Rio Grande Valley.” Southwestern Entomologist17:279–88.
50.
SuttonSharon E.KempSusan P.2006. “Integrating Social Science and Design Inquiry through Interdisciplinary Design Charrettes: An Approach to Participatory Community Problem Solving.” American Journal of Community Psychology38:125–39.
51.
TanakaTakahiroAbramsonDaniel B.YamazakiYoshito. 2009. “Using GIS in Community Design Charrettes: Lessons from a Japan–U.S. Collaboration in Earthquake Recovery and Mitigation Planning for Kobe.” Habitat International33:310–18.
52.
Texas Center for Policy Studies. 1999. Economy and Environment in the Lower Rio Grande Valley: Results of Four Leaders’ Forums in Brownsville, Texas. Austin: Texas Center for Policy Studies.
53.
ThornthwaiteCharles W.1948. “An Approach toward a National Classification of Climate.” Geography Review38:55–94.
54.
TokerUmut. 2017. Making Community Design Work: A Guide for Planners. New York: Routledge.
55.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 1997. Final Lower Rio Grande Valley and Santa Anna National Wildlife Refuges Comprehensive Conservation Plan. Albuquerque: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
56.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2010. Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan. Albuquerque: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
57.
Valencia-SandovalCeciliaFlandersDavid N.KozakRobert A.2010. “Participatory Landscape Planning and Sustainable Community Development: Methodological Observations from a Case Study in Rural Mexico.” Landscape and Urban Planning48:63–70.
58.
VoglerDonnaMaceySuzanneSigouinAmanda. 2017. “Stakeholder Analysis in Environmental and Conservation Planning.” Lessons in Conservation7:5–16.
59.
WainwrightS. E.MoraM. A.SericanoJ. L.ThomasP.2001. “Chlorinated Hydrocarbons and Biomarkers of Exposure in Wading Birds and Fish in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas.” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology40:101–11.
60.
WhiteDonald H.MitchellChristine A.KaiserT. Earl. 1983. “Temporal Accumulation of Organochlorine Pesticides in Shorebirds Wintering on the South Texas Coast, 1979–80.” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology12:214–45.
61.
WhiteDonald H.MitchellChristine A.KennedyHarry D.KrynitskyAlexander J.RibickMichael A.1983. “Elevated DDE and Toxaphene Residue in Fishes and Birds Reflect Local Contamination in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas.” Southwestern Naturalist28:325–33.
62.
WolfAmanda. 2016. “Between-Case Dialogue: Public Engagement in the Second-Person Voice.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Science6:609–16.
63.
WoosmanK. M.DudensingR. M.HanselkaD.AleshinoyeK.2012. Economic Impact of Nature Tourism on the Rio Grande Valley: Considering Peak and Off-Peak Visitation for 2011. College Station: Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University.
64.
YuJ.NorwineJ.BinghamR.TebaldiC.2006. “Potential Climatic Deterioration in Semiarid Subtropical South Texas.” Geography Online6 (2):1–19.
