Landmines are indiscriminate weapons of mass terror that detrimentally affect human beings, the ecological system they live in, the regional economy, and political stability. Despite the extensive nature of the impacts, the landmine crisis is almost exclusively advocated on the basis of human rights principles. A comprehensive framework that considers environmental degradation as a principal aftermath of the global landmine crisis is critically missing from the broader matrix of variables around which the anti-landmine movement converges. This article discusses the current humanitarian framework of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines; its shortcomings to address the interconnected impacts of landmines on the environment; and attempts to describe what an inclusive, environmentally sensitive framework would have to incorporate to address the overall landmine impacts effectively.
Andersson, N., da Sousa, C. P., & Paredes, S. (1995). Social cost of land mines in four countries: Afghanistan, Bosnia, Cambodia, and Mozambique. British Medical Journal, 311, 718-721.
2.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing process and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
3.
Berhe, A. A. (2000). Landmines and land degradation: A regional political ecology perspective on the impacts of landmines on environment and development in the developing world. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
4.
Berhe, A. A. (2005). Landmines and land degradation: Environmental aftermath of a conventional weapon of mass destruction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5.
Blaikie, P. M., & Brookfield, H. (1987). Land Degradation and Society. London: Methuen& Co.
6.
Bosselman, K. (1999). Human rights and the environment: Redefining fundamental principles? Paper presented at the Environmental Issues and Legal Process Conference. Retrieved from http://www.arbld.unimelb.edu.au/envjust/papers/allpapers/bosselmann/home.htm
7.
Boutros-Ghali, B. (1994). The landmine crisis: A humanitarian disaster. Foreign Affairs, 73, 8.
8.
Buenker, M. A. (2000). Landmines: A threat to wildlife and sustainability. World Conservation, pp. 19-20.
9.
Cameron, A. M., Lawson, R. J., & Tomlin, B. W. (1998). To walk without fear: The global movement to ban landmines. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
10.
Carroll, J. (1997, December 9). The people vs. landmines. Boston Globe, City Edition, p. A31.
11.
Croll, M. (1998). The history of landmines. London: Leo Cooper.
12.
Gamson, W. A., & Meyer, D. S. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In M. N. Zald (Ed.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 275-290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Grange, M., & Larson, R. (1998). The landmine campaign still needs churches. The Lutheran World Federation, World Alliance of Reformed Churches and World Council of Churches, Chevallier Imprimeurs, France.
14.
Gray, B. (1997, July 14-17). Landmines: The most toxic and widespread pollution facing mankind. Paper presented at “A colloquium, towards Ottawa and beyond—Demining the region, The environmental impacts,” International Campaign to Ban Landmines, University of Sydney, Australia.
15.
Harpviken, K. B. (1999a). A community study of landmines and humanitarian demining: Cassua, Kwanza Norte, Angola (Landmine Memo No. 7). Oslo: Assistance to Mine Affected Communities (AMAC), International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.prio.no/amac
16.
Harpviken, K. B. (1999b). Community-based mine awareness: AMAA’s project in Herat Province, Afghanistan (Landmine Memo No. 4). Oslo: Assistance to Mine Affected Communities (AMAC), International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.prio.no/amac
17.
Harpviken, K. B. (1999c). Towards community-based demining? AREA’s project in Nangrahar Province, Afghanistan (Landmine Memo No. 3). Oslo: Assistance to Mine Affected Communities (AMAC), International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.prio.no/amac
18.
Harpviken, K. B. (2000). A community study of landmines and humanitarian demining: Cassua, Kwanza Norte, Angola (Landmine Memo No. 7). Oslo: Assistance to Mine Affected Communities (AMAC), International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.prio.no/amac
19.
Harpviken, K. B., Juergensen, O., & Nergaad, P. (1999). Towards new indicators of success in humanitarian mine action. Paper presented at Report From Roundtable Discussion at the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo.
20.
International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (1998). Bill of rights for landmine survivors. Retrieved from http://www.icbl.org
21.
International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (1999). Final statement of Bad Honnef II. Retrieved from http://www.icbl.org
22.
International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2001). Financial statement from independent auditor—2001. Retrieved from http://www.icbl.org/content/download/6929/159149/file/2001audit.pdf
23.
International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2002). International Campaign to Ban Landmines, annual report 2002. Retrieved from http://www.icbl.org/campaign/annual_reports/2002
24.
International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2003a). International Campaign to Ban Landmines, annual report 2003. Retrieved from http://www.icbl.org/campaign/annual_reports/2003
25.
International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2003b). Ratification update. Retrieved from http://www.icbl.org/ratification/
26.
International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2004). Campaign history. Retrieved from http://www.icbl.org/campaign/history
27.
Johnston, B. R. (1995). Human rights and the environment. Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 111-124.
28.
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Landmine Monitor. (2000). Towards a mine-free world. Belgium: International Campaign to Ban Landmines.
30.
Landmine Monitor. (2002). Towards a mine-free world: Executive summary. Belgium: International Campaign to Ban Landmines.
31.
Landmine Survivors Network. (2003). Human rights advocacy: The fight against landmines. Washington, DC: Author.
32.
Matthew, R. A., & Rutherford, K. R. (2003). The evolutionary dynamics of the movement to ban landmines. Alternatives, 28, 29-56.
33.
McGrath, R. (1994). Landmines: Legacy of conflict: A manual for development workers. United Kingdom: Oxfam.
34.
Millard, A. (2000). A community living with mines and demining: The case of Bandua, Mozambique (Landmine Memo No. 6). Oslo: Assistance to Mine Affected Communities (AMAC), International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.prio.no/amac
35.
Millard, A. S., Harpviken, K. B., & Kjellman, K. E. (2002). Risk removed? Steps towards building trust in humanitarian mine action. Disasters, 26, 161-174.
36.
Nachón, C. T. (2000). Environmental aspects of the international crisis of antipersonnel landmines and the implementation of the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty: Thematic report (Landmine Monitor Report 2000). Retrieved from http://www.icbl.org/lm/2000/appendices/environment.html
37.
Newton, M. (1997, February 25-28). The scourge of the earth: The impacts of landmines on the environment. Paper presented for the workshop on Landmines and the Environment, 4th International NGO Conference on Landmines: Toward a Mine-Free Southern Africa, Maputo, Mozambique.
38.
Orehovec, Z., Music, S., Palinkas, L., Miko, S., Ristic, M., & Bokan, S. (1998). Danger of land mines, unexploded shells, and environmental consequences of the recent war on the territory of the Republic of Croatia. Retrieved from www.http://members.xoom.com/dassur/croatia.doc
39.
Roberts, S., & Williams, J. (1995). After the guns fall silent: The enduring legacy of landmines. Washington, DC: Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation.
40.
Sachs, A. (1995). Eco-justice: Linking human rights and environment. In J. A. Peterson (Ed.), World Watch paper 127. December 1995. Washington, DC: World Watch Institute.
41.
Schlosberg, D. (1999). Networks and mobile arrangements: Organizational innovation in the US environmental justice movement. In C. Roots (Ed.), Environmental movements: Local, national and global (pp. 122-148). United Kingdom: Frank Cass.
42.
Tarrow, S. (1996). States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. In M. N. Zald (Ed.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 275-290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Troll, K. (2000). The impact of anti-personnel landmines on the environment. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.
44.
United Nations Environment Programme UNEP/IG.4/3. (1977). Intergovernmental expert group on environment and development and on environmental impacts arising from uses of natural resource. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
45.
United Nations General Assembly UNGA/A/38/383. (1983, October 19). Problem of remnants of war—Report of the secretary general. Development and international economic cooperation: Environment (38th session). New York: United Nations.
46.
Wapner, P. (1996). Environmental activism and world civic politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
