In 2017, Baltimore City was awarded $75 million earmarked for the targeted demolition of a portion of its 16,000 vacant and abandoned buildings. Selecting an optimal set of demolition targets is difficult given that the cost per demolition is not independent of the overall demolition pattern; like many older cities, Baltimore’s abandoned housing includes a large number of attached row houses, which require the construction of retaining walls when a demolished home abuts a non-demolished home. In this paper, we present a method by which planners can use integer linear programming to identify optimal demolition targets for a number of potential objectives. The simplest objective, demolishing the maximum number of houses for a specific budget, is compared with more complex functions that attempt to proxy improved quality of life resulting from the demolitions. The results of different objective functions are then assessed in terms of equity and efficiency using the spatial distribution of proposed targets as a point of comparison.
De LoeraJesus A.HemmeckeRaymondKöppeMatthias. 2012. Algebraic and Geometric Ideas in the Theory of Discrete Optimization. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
FainsteinSusan. 2011. The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
FarfelMark Anna O. OrlovaLeesPeter S. J.RohdeCharlesAshleyPeter J.ChisolmJ. JulianJr.2003. “A Study of Urban Housing Demolitions as Sources of Lead in Ambient Dust: Demolition Practices and Exterior Dust Fall.” Environmental Health Perspectives111 (9): 1228–34.
15.
FulliloveMindy Thompson. 2016. Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do about It. Oakland, CA: New Village Press.
16.
GabrielSteven A.FariaJose A.MoglenGlenn E.2006. “A Multiobjective Optimization Approach to Smart Growth in Land Development.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences40 (3): 212–48.
17.
GarbodenPhilipJang-TrettienChristine. 2020. “There’s Money to Be Made in Community”: Real Estate Developers, Community Organizing, and Profit-Making in a Shrinking City.” Journal of Urban Affairs42 (3): 414–34.
GohKian. 2015. “Who’s Smart? Whose City? The Sociopolitics of Urban Intelligence.” In Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities, edited by GeertmanStanFerreiraJoeGoodspeedRobertStillwellJohn, 61–76. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_4.
20.
GomezMarisela B.2013. Race, Class, Power, and Organizing in East Baltimore: Rebuilding Abandoned Communities in America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
21.
GoodspeedRobert. 2015. “Smart Cities: Moving Beyond Urban Cybernetics to Tackle Wicked Problems.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8 (1): 79–92.
22.
HanHye-Sung. 2014. “The Impact of Abandoned Properties on Nearby Property Values.” Housing Policy Debate24 (2): 311–34.
23.
HanHye-Sung. 2017. “Exploring Threshold Effects in the Impact of Housing Abandonment on Nearby Property Values.” Urban Affairs Review55: 772–99. doi:1078087417720303.
24.
HollanderJustin B.NémethJeremy. 2011. “The Bounds of Smart Decline: A Foundational Theory for Planning Shrinking Cities.” Housing Policy Debate21 (3): 349–36.
JohnAccordinoJohnsonGary T.2000. “Addressing the Vacant and Abandoned Property Problem.” Journal of Urban Affairs22 (3): 301–15. doi:10.1111/0735-2166.00058.
27.
JohnsonMichael P.HollanderJustinHallulliAlma. 2014. “Maintain, Demolish, Re-Purpose: Policy Design for Vacant Land Management Using Decision Models.” Cities40:151–62.
28.
JohnsonMichael P.HollanderJustinWhitemanE. Davenport. 2015. “Data and Analytics for Neighborhood Development: Smart Shrinkage Decision Modeling in Baltimore, Maryland.” In Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities, edited by GeertmanStanFerreiraJoeGoodspeedRobertStillwellJohn, 61–76. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_4.
29.
JohnsonMichael P.KeislerJeffrey M.SolakSenayTurcotteDavid A.BayramArmaganDrewRachel Bogardus. 2016. Decision Science for Housing and Community Development: Localized and Evidence-based Responses to Distressed Housing and Blighted Communities. New York: John Wiley.
30.
LeeDouglas B.1973. “Requiem for Large-Scale Models.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners39 (3): 163–78.
31.
LoganJohn R.MolotchHarvey. 2007. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
MallachAlan. 2006. Bringing Buildings Back: From Abandoned Properties to Community Assets: A Guidebook for Policymakers and Practitioners. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
McHargIan. 1992. Design with Nature. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
35.
MidgleyGeraldJohnsonMichael P.ChichirauGeorge. 2018. “What Is Community Operational Research?” European Journal of Operational Research268 (3): 771–83.
36.
MikelbankBrian A.2008. “Spatial Analysis of the Impact of Vacant, Abandoned and Foreclosed Properties.” Cleveland: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
37.
MollenkopfJohn H.1983. The Contested City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
NémethJeremyHollanderJustin B.WhitemanElizaJohnsonMichael P.2020. “Planning with Justice in Mind in a Shrinking Baltimore.” Journal of Urban Affairs42 (3): 351–70.
40.
NewmanGalenHollanderJustin B.LeeJaekyungGuDonghwanKimBoahLeeRyun JungHorneyJennifer A.BearfieldDomonicLiYuxian. 2018. “Smarter Shrinkage: A Neighborhood-Scaled Rightsizing Strategy Based on Land Use Dynamics.” Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis2 (2): 11.
PrudenteTim. 2018. “Collapse: The Rise and Deadly Fall of a Baltimore Rowhouse.” The Baltimore Sun. July12:2018.
43.
RittelHorst W. J.WebberMelvin M.1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences4:155–69.
44.
RosenSherwin. 1974. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy82 (1): 34–55.
45.
RubensteinJames M.1988. “Relocation of Families for Public Improvement Projects: Lessons from Baltimore.” Journal of the American Planning Association 54 2: 185–96.
46.
SchrijverAlexander. 1998. Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. New York: John Wiley.
47.
SchrijverAlexander. 2003. Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency. Vol. 24. New York: Springer.
48.
ShlayAnne B.WhitmanGordon. 2006. “Research for Democracy: Linking Community Organizing and Research to Leverage Blight Policy.” City & Community5 (2): 153–71.
49.
SkoganWesley. 1992. Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
SpelmanWilliam. 1993. “Abandoned Buildings: Magnets for Crime?” Journal of Criminal Justice21 (5): 481–95.
51.
StegmanMichael. 1972. Housing Investment in the Inner City: The Dynamics of Decline; a Study of Baltimore, Maryland, 1968-1970. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
SternliebGeorgeBurchellRobert W.PaulusVirginia. 1972. Residential Abandonment: The Environment of Decay. Monticello: Council of Planning Librarians.
54.
StokerRobert P.StoneClarence N.WorgsDonn. 2015. “Neighborhood Policy in Baltimore: The Postindustrial Turn.” In Urban Neighborhoods in a New Era: Revitalization Politics in the Postindustrial City, edited by StoneClarence N.StokerRobert P., 50–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
ThakuriahPiyushimita (Vonu), ThakuriahTilahunNebiyouZellnerMoira. 2017. “Big Data and Urban Informatics: Innovations and Challenges to Urban Planning and Knowledge Discovery.” In Seeing Cities through Big Data, edited by ThakuriahPiyushimita (Vonu)TilahunNebiyouZellnerMoira, 11–45. Cham: Springer.
56.
ValeLawrence J.2013. Purging the Poorest: Public Housing and the Design Politics of Twice-Cleared Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
WilsonDavidMargulisHarry. 1994. “Spatial Aspects of Housing Abandonment in the 1990s: The Cleveland Experience.” Housing Studies9 (4): 493–510.
58.
WinthropBobHerrRebecca. 2009. “Determining the COST of Vacancies in Baltimore.” Government Finance Review, June.
59.
WolseyLaurence A.1998. Integer Programming. (Vol. 52). New York: John Wiley.
60.
WolseyLaurence A.NemhauserGeorge L.1999. Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. Vol. 55. John Wiley.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
