Planners need straightforward tools to guide them toward the selection of appropriate strategies for resolving problems of housing affordability in their communities. Planners should use these tools to update their consolidated plans periodically, assessing the fit between the community's housing market conditions and the intervention strategies selected. Research suggests that planners often fail to select strategies that fit the conditions in their markets. This article offers a relatively uncomplicated technique designed to use census data to aid planners and local decision makers in better understanding the nature of the housing problem in each market sector.
Apgar, William. 1990. Which housing policy is best?Housing PolicyDebate1 (1): 1-32.
2.
Bogdon, Amy, Joshua Silver, and Margery Austin Turner. 1993. National analysis of housing affordability, adequacy, and availability: A framework for local housing strategies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
3.
Ernst & Young LLP,Kenneth Leventhal Real Estate Group. 1997. The low-income housing tax credit: The first decade. Boston: Ernst & Young LLP.
4.
Galster, George. 1996. William Grigsby and the analysis of housing sub-markets and filtering. Urban Studies33 (10): 1797-1805.
5.
Galster, George. 1997. Comparing demand-side and supply-side housing policies: Sub-market and spatial perspectives. Housing Studies12 (4): 561-577.
6.
Galster, George, and Jerome Rothenberg. 1991. Filtering in urban housing: A graphical analysis of a quality-segmented market. Journal of Planning Education and Research11 (1): 37-50.
7.
Grigsby, William G.1963. Housing markets and public policy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8.
Kain, John, and John Quigley. 1975. Housing markets and racial discrimination: A microeconomic analysis. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
9.
Malpezzi, Stephen, and Richard K. Green. 1996. What has happened to the bottom of the US Housing Market?Urban Studies33 (10): 1807-1820.
Millennial Housing Commission. 2002. Meeting our nation's housing challenges: Report of the Millennial Housing Commission. Washington, D.C.: Congress of the United States.
Nelson, Katherine P., and Jill Khadduri. 1992. To whom should limited housing resources be directed?Housing Policy Debate3 (1): 1-55.
14.
Schill, Michael H., Ingrid Gould Ellen, Amy Ellen Schwartz, and Ioan Voicu. 2002. Revitalizing inner-city neighborhoods: New York City's ten-year plan. Housing Policy Debate13 (3): 529-566.
15.
Schill, Michael H., and Susan M. Wachter. 2001. Principles to guide housing policy at the beginning of the millennium. Cityscape5 (2): 5-19.
16.
Struyk, Raymond J.1990. Comment on which housing policy is best? 1990. Housing Policy Debate1 (1): 41-51.
17.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. n.d. U.S. Bureau of the Census. http://www.census.gov.
18.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (n.d.). Urban consumers, all items. In U.S. Department of Commerce, Consumer price index. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Commerce.
19.
U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1995. American housing surveyfor the United States 1993. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1999. The widening gap: New findings on housing affordability in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
21.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2000. Rental housing assistance—The worsening crisis: A report to Congress on worst case housing needs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
22.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2003. Formula and consolidate [sic]plan special tabulation request. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
23.
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1988. Home ownership: Mortgage bonds are costly and provide little assistance to those in Need. GAO/ RCED-88-11. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office.
24.
Urban Institute. 1995. Implementing block grants for housing: An evaluation of the first year of HOME. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
25.
Urban Institute. 1998. Expanding the nation's supply of affordable housing: An evaluation of the Home Investment Partnerships Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
26.
Weicher, John. 1990. The voucher/production debate. In BuildingFoundations, edited by Denise DiPasquale and Langley C. Keyes, 263-292. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27.
Weicher, John, and Thomas G. Thibodeau. 1988. Filtering and housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics23 (1): 21-40.
28.
Winnick, Louis. 1995. The triumph of housing allowance programs: How fundamental policy conflict was resolved. Cityscape1 (3): 95-121.
29.
Yinger, John. 1998. Housing discrimination is still worth worrying about. Housing Policy Debate9 (4): 893-927.
