The relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and walking remains underexamined, and prior research identifies multiple models of walking behavior. This research examines the distribution of walking across SES, using the 2001, 2009, and 2017 National Household Travel Surveys. Statistical models estimate walking rates and likelihoods by trip purpose, controlling for income, education, and other factors. Findings include less walking by middle-SES travelers and specific trip purposes favoring walking by high-SES adults in urban areas. Increases in walking between 2001 and 2017 are broad based, but persistent imbalances suggest the need for a more pluralistic view of walkability.
AgrawalAsha WeinsteinSchimekPaul. 2007. “Extent and Correlates of Walking in the USA.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment12 (8): 548–63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2007.07.005.
2.
AguiarMarkHurstErik. 2006. Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time over Five Decades. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
AguiarMarkHurstErik. 2009. “A Summary of Trends in American Time Allocation: 1965–2005.” Social Indicators Research93 (1): 57–64. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9362-0.
4.
AlbrightCarolynThompsonDixie L. 2006. “The Effectiveness of Walking in Preventing Cardiovascular Disease in Women: A Review of the Current Literature.” Journal of Women’s Health15 (3): 271–80.
5.
AnableJillian. 2005. “‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying Travel Behaviour Segments Using Attitude Theory.” Transport Policy12 (1): 65–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.11.004.
6.
AppleyardBruce S.2003. “Planning Safe Routes to School.” Planning69 (5): 34–37.
7.
AttanasioOrazioHurstErikPistaferriLuigi. 2012. The Evolution of Income, Consumption, and Leisure Inequality in the US, 1980–2010. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
BerriganDavidTroianoRichard P. 2002. “The Association between Urban Form and Physical Activity in U.S. Adults.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine23 (2/Suppl. 1): 74–79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00476-2.
9.
BlumenbergEvelyn. 2009a. “Moving in and Moving Around: Immigrants, Travel Behavior, and Implications for Transport Policy.” International Journal of Transportation Research1 (2): 169–80.
10.
BlumenbergEvelyn. 2009b. “Moving in and Moving Around: Immigrants, Travel Behavior, and Implications for Transport Policy.” Transportation Letters1 (2): 169–80. doi: 10.3328/TL.2009.01.02.169-180.
11.
BoarnetMarlonCraneRandall. 2001. Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
BuehlerRalphHamreAndrea. 2014. “The Multimodal Majority? Driving, Walking, Cycling, and Public Transportation Use among American Adults.” Transportation42 (6): 1081–1101. doi: 10.1007/s11116-014-9556-z.
13.
CameronA. ColinTrivediPravin K. 2013. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Econometric Society Monograph no. 53. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CaoXinyuMokhtarianPatricia L.HandySusan L. 2009. “The Relationship between the Built Environment and Nonwork Travel: A Case Study of Northern California.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice43 (5): 548–59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.02.001.
15.
ChatmanDaniel G.2013. “Does TOD Need the T?”Journal of the American Planning Association79 (1): 17–31. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2013.791008.
16.
ChatmanDaniel G.KleinNicholas. 2009. “Immigrants and Travel Demand in the United States: Implications for Transportation Policy and Future Research.” Public Works Management & Policy13 (4): 312–27. doi: 10.1177/1087724x09334633.
17.
ClarkTerry Nichols. 2002. Urban Amenities: Lakes, Opera, and Juice Bars, Do They Drive Development?Chicago: University of Chicago.
18.
CliftonKelly J.2003. “Independent Mobility among Teenagers: Exploration of Travel to After-school Activities.” Journal of the Transportation Research Board1854:74–80.
19.
CsikszentmihalyiMihaly. 2000. “The Costs and Benefits of Consuming.” Journal of Consumer Research27 (2): 267–72.
20.
DiMaggioPaulMohrJohn. 1985. “Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection.” American Journal of Sociology90 (6): 1231–61. doi: 10.1086/228209.
21.
EwingReidCerveroRobert. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment.” Journal of the American Planning Association76 (3): 265–94. doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766.
22.
Federal Highway Administration. 2018a. 2017 NHTS Data User Guide. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Transportation.
23.
Federal Highway Administration. 2018b. 2017 NHTS Technical Release Notes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
24.
GlaeserEdward L.GottliebJoshua D. 2006. “Urban Resurgence and the Consumer City.” Urban Studies43 (8): 1275–99.
GreenwaldMichael JBoarnetMarlon G. 2001. “Built Environment as Determinant of Walking Behavior: Analyzing Nonwork Pedestrian Travel in Portland, Oregon.” Journal of the Transportation Research Board1780:33–41.
27.
HallalPedro C.AzevedoMario R.ReichertFelipe F.SiqueiraFernando V.AraújoCora L. P.VictoraCesar G. 2005. “Who, When, and How Much? Epidemiology of Walking in a Middle-income Country.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine28 (2): 156–61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.012.
28.
HandySusanCaoXinyuMokhtarianPatricia L. 2006. “Self-selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California.” Journal of the American Planning Association72 (1): 55–74. doi: 10.1080/01944360608976724.
29.
HandySusan L.BoarnetMarlon G.EwingReidKillingsworthRichard E. 2002. “How the Built Environment Affects Physical Activity: View from Urban Planning.” American Journal of Preventative Medicine23 (2S): 64–73.
30.
HirschJana A.Diez RouxAna V.RodriguezDaniel A.BrinesShannon J.MooreKari A. 2013. “Discrete Land Uses and Transportation Walking in Two U.S. Cities: The Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.” Health & Place24:196–202. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.09.007.
31.
KomanoffCharlesRoelofsCora. 1993. The Environmental Benefits of Bicycling and Walking. Vol. 15. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
32.
KrizekKevin J.HandyS.PiatkowskiD. 2011. “Walking and Cycling’s Role in Addressing Climate Change: Accounting for the Substitution Effect.” Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board annual meeting, Washington, DC, January.
33.
KrugerJudyHamSandra A.BerriganDavidBallard-BarbashRachel. 2008. “Prevalence of Transportation and Leisure Walking among U.S. Adults.” Preventive Medicine47 (3): 329–34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.018.
34.
LeinbergerChristopher B.AlfonzoMariela. 2012. Walk This Way: The Economic Promise of Walkable Places in Metropolitan Washington, DC. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
35.
ManaughKevinEl-GeneidyAhmed. 2011. “Validating Walkability Indices: How Do Different Households Respond to the Walkability of Their Neighborhood?”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment16 (4): 309–15. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009.
36.
McConvilleMegan E.RodríguezDaniel A.CliftonKellyChoGihyougFleischhackerSheila. 2011. “Disaggregate Land Uses and Walking.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine40 (1): 25–32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.023.
37.
McDonaldNoreen C.2015. “Are Millennials Really the ‘Go-nowhere’ Generation?”Journal of the American Planning Association81 (2): 90–103. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1057196.
38.
McDonaldNoreen C.BrownAustin L.MarchettiLauren M.PedrosoMargo S. 2011. “US School Travel, 2009: An Assessment of Trends.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine41 (2): 146–51.
39.
MillwardHughSpinneyJamieScottDarren. 2013. “Active-transport Walking Behavior: Destinations, Durations, Distances.” Journal of Transport Geography28:101–10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012.
40.
MokhtarianPatricia L.SalomonIlanRedmondLothlorien S. 2001. “Understanding the Demand for Travel: It’s Not Purely ‘Derived.’”Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research14 (4): 355–80. doi: 10.1080/13511610120106147.
41.
PivoGaryFisherJeffrey D. 2011. “The Walkability Premium in Commercial Real Estate Investments.” Real Estate Economics39 (2): 185–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00296.x.
42.
PlautPnina O.2005. “Non-motorized Commuting in the US.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment10 (5): 347–56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.002.
43.
PucherJohnBuehlerRalphMeromDafnaBaumanAdrian. 2011. “Walking and Cycling in the United States, 2001–2009: Evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys.” American Journal of Public Health101 (Suppl. 1): S310–17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300067.
44.
PucherJohnRenneJohn L. 2003. “Socioeconomics of Urban Travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS.” Transportation Quarterly57 (3): 49–77.
45.
RauterkusStephanie YatesMillerNorman G. 2011. “Residential Land Values and Walkability.” Journal of Sustainable Real Estate3 (1): 23–43.
46.
SantosAdellaMcGuckinNancyNakamotoHikari YukikoGrayDanielleLissSusan. 2011. Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
47.
SchneiderRobert J.2013. “Theory of Routine Mode Choice Decisions: An Operational Framework to Increase Sustainable Transportation.” Transport Policy25:128–37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.007.
SouthworthMichael. 2005. “Designing the Walkable City.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development131 (4): 246–57.
50.
SpeckJeff. 2012. Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time. New York: North Point.
51.
StataCorp. 2013. Stata Statistical Software, Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
52.
StevensMark R.2017. “Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?”Journal of the American Planning Association83 (1): 7–18. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044.
53.
StorperMichaelVenablesAnthony J. 2004. “Buzz: Face-to-face Contact and the Urban Economy.” Journal of Economic Geography4 (4): 351–70. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027.
54.
TalenEmilyMenozziSunnySchaeferChloe. 2015. “What Is a ‘Great Neighborhood’? An Analysis of APA’s Top-rated Places.” Journal of the American Planning Association81 (2): 121–41. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1067573.
55.
TryggedSvenAhacicKozmaKåreholtIngemar. 2011. “Income and Education as Predictors of Return to Working Life among Younger Stroke Patients.” BMC Public Health11 (1): 742. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-742.
YangYongDiez-RouxAna V. 2012. “Walking Distance by Trip Purpose and Population Subgroups.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine43 (1): 11–19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015.
58.
ZahranSammyBrodySamuel D.MaghelalPraveenPrelogAndrewLacyMichael. 2008. “Cycling and Walking: Explaining the Spatial Distribution of Healthy Modes of Transportation in the United States.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment13 (7): 462–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2008.08.001.
59.
ZukMiriamBierbaumArielChappleKarenGorskaKarolinaLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasiaOngPaulThomasTrevor. 2015. Gentrification, Displacement, and the Role of Public Investment: A Literature Review. Berkeley: University of California.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
