Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature reviews in planning education and research.
AndrewsRichardHarlenWynne. 2006. “Issues in Synthesizing Research in Education.” Educational Research48 (3): 287–99.
2.
AnthonyDavid R.GucciardiDaniel F.GordonSandy. 2016. “A Meta-study of Qualitative Research on Mental Toughness Development.” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology9 (1): 160–90.
3.
ArkseyHilaryO’MalleyLisa. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology8 (1):19–32.
4.
ArnoldRachelFletcherDavid. 2012. “A Research Synthesis and Taxonomic Classification of the Organizational Stressors Encountered by Sport Performers.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology34 (3): 397–429.
5.
BanningJames H.2005. “Ecological Triangulation: An Approach for Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.” What works for youth with disabilities’ project, US Department of Education, School of Education, Colorado: Colorado State University. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.152.5185&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed July 21, 2016.
6.
Barnett-PageElaineThomasJames. 2009. “Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: A Critical Review.” BMC Medical Research Methodology9 (1): 1–11.
7.
BaylissH. R.BeyerF. R.2015. “Information Retrieval for Ecological Syntheses.” Research Synthesis Methods6 (2): 136–48.
8.
BreretonaPearlKitchenhamaBarbara A.BudgenbDavidTurneraMarkKhalilcMohamed. 2007. “Lessons from Applying the Systematic Literature Review Process within the Software Engineering Domain.” Journal of Systems and Software80 (4): 571–83.
9.
BrittenNickyCampbellRonaPopeCatherineDonovanJennyMorganMyfanwyPillRoisin. 2002. “Using Meta Ethnography to Synthesise Qualitative Research: A Worked Example.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy7 (4): 209–15.
10.
CarrollChristopherBoothAndrewLeavissJoannaRickJo. 2013. “‘Best Fit’ Framework Synthesis: Refining the Method.” BMC Medical Research Methodology13 (1): 1–16.
11.
CroninP.RyanF.CoughlanM.2008. “Undertaking a Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Approach.” British Journal of Nursing17 (1): 38–43.
12.
DieckmannN. F.MalleB. F.BodnerT. E.2009. “An Empirical Assessment of Meta-Analytic Practice.” Review of General Psychology13 (2): 101–15.
13.
Dixon-WoodsMary. 2011. “Using Framework-Based Synthesis for Conducting Reviews of Qualitative Studies.” BMC Medicine9 (1): 1.
14.
Dixon-WoodsMaryAgarwalShonaJonesDavidYoungBridgetSuttonAlex. 2005. “Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: A Review of Possible Methods.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy10 (1): 45–53.
15.
Dixon-WoodsMaryCaversDebbieAgarwalShonaAnnandaleEllenArthurAntonyHarveyJanetHsuRonKatbamnaSavitaOlsenRichardSmithLucy. 2006. “Conducting a Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature on Access to Healthcare by Vulnerable Groups.” BMC Medical Research Methodology6 (1): 1.
16.
EwingReidCerveroRobert. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association76 (3): 265–94.
17.
FinkA.2005. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
FisherCarla L.MaloneyErinGlogowskiEmilyHurleyKarenEdgersonShawnaLichtenthalWendy G.KissaneDavidBylundCarma. 2014. “Talking about Familial Breast Cancer Risk Topics and Strategies to Enhance Mother–Daughter Interactions.” Qualitative Health Research24 (4): 517–35.
19.
FlemmingK.2010. “Synthesis of Quantitative and Qualitative Research: An Example Using Critical Interpretive Synthesis.” Journal of Advanced Nursing66 (1): 201–17.
20.
GatesS.2002. “Review of Methodology of Quantitative Reviews Using Meta-analysis in Ecology.” Journal of Animal Ecology71 (4): 547–57.
21.
GlassGene V.1976. “Primary, Secondary, and Meta-analysis of Research.” Educational Researcher5 (10): 3–8.
22.
GomersallJ. S.JadotteY. T.XueY. F.LockwoodS.RiddleD.PredaA.2015. “Conducting Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations.” International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare13 (3): 170–78.
23.
GordonPeterRichardsonHarry W.1997. “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?”Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 95–106.
24.
GrantM. J.BoothA.2009. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information and Libraries Journal26 (2): 91–108.
25.
GreenB. N.JohnsonC. D.AdamsA.2001. “Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-Reviewed Journals: Secrets of the Trade.” Journal of Sports Chiropractic & Rehabilitation15 (1): 5–19.
26.
GreenhalghTrishaRobertGlennMacfarlaneFraserBatePaulKyriakidouOlivia. 2004. “Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations.” The Milbank Quarterly82 (4): 581–629.
27.
GreenhalghTrishaRobertGlennMacfarlaneFraserBatePaulKyriakidouOlympiaPeacockRichard. 2005. “Storylines of Research in Diffusion of Innovation: A Meta-narrative Approach to Systematic Review.” Social Science & Medicine61 (2): 417–30.
28.
HaddawayN. R.WoodcockP.MacuraB.CollinsA.2015. “Making Literature Reviews More Reliable through Application of Lessons from Systematic Reviews.” Conservation Biology29 (6): 1596–605.
29.
HardenAngelaThomasJames. 2005. “Methodological Issues in Combining Diverse Study Types in Systematic Reviews.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology8 (3): 257–71.
30.
HardenSamantha M.McEwanDesmondSylvesterBenjamin DKauliusMeganRuissenGeralynBurkeShauna MEstabrooksPaul ABeauchampMark R. 2015. “Understanding for Whom, under What Conditions, and How Group-Based Physical Activity Interventions Are Successful: A Realist Review.” BMC Public Health15 (1): 1.
31.
HeyvaertMiekeMaesBeaOnghenaPatrick. 2011. “Applying Mixed Methods Research at the Synthesis Level: An Overview.” Research in the Schools18 (1): 12–24.
32.
KastnerM.TriccoA. C.SoobiahC.LillieE.PerrierL.HorsleyT.WelchV.CogoE.AntonyJ.StrausS. E.2012. “What Is the Most Appropriate Knowledge Synthesis Method to Conduct a Review? Protocol for a Scoping Review.” BMC Medical Research Methodology12:114.
33.
KitchenhamBarbaraChartersStuart. 2007. “Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering.” In EBSE Technical Report, Software Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University, Department of Computer Science, University of Durham.
34.
KorhonenA.Hakulinen-ViitanenT.JylhaV.HolopainenA.2013. “Meta-synthesis and Evidence-Based Health Care—A Method for Systematic Review.” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences27 (4): 1027–34.
35.
KuhnThomas S.1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. 2, no. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
LevyY.EllisT. J.2006. “A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research.” Informing Science Journal9:182–212.
37.
LimkakengJr.AlexanderT.Lucas Lentini Herling de OliveiraMoreiraTaisPhadtareAmrutaRodriguesClarissa GarciaHockerMichael B.McKinneyRossVoilsCorrine I.PietrobonRicardo. 2014. “Systematic Review and Metasummary of Attitudes toward Research in Emergency Medical Conditions.” Journal of Medical Ethics40 (6): 401–8.
38.
LindellMichael K.PerryRonald W.2000. “Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard: A Review of Research.” Environment and Behavior32 (4): 461–501.
39.
LucasPatricia J.BairdJanisAraiLisaLawCatherineRobertsHelen M.2007. “Worked Examples of Alternative Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Systematic Reviews.” BMC Medical Research Methodology7 (1): 4.
40.
LudvigsenM. S.HallE. O. C.MeyerG.FegranL.AagaardH.UhrenfeldtL.2016. “Using Sandelowski and Barroso’s Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence.” Qualitative Health Research26 (3): 320–29.
41.
MalekpourShirinBrownRebekah R.de HaanFjalar J.2015. “Strategic Planning of Urban Infrastructure for Environmental Sustainability: Understanding the Past to Intervene for the Future.” Cities46:67–75.
42.
MaysN.PopeC.PopayJ.2005. “Systematically Reviewing Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence to Inform Management and Policy-Making in the Health Field.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy10 (Suppl 1): 6–20.
43.
MyersP. M. D.2008. Qualitative Research in Business & Management. London: Sage.
44.
NeelyEvaWaltonMatStephensChristine. 2014. “Young People’s Food Practices and Social Relationships. A Thematic Synthesis.” Appetite82:50–60.
NoordzijM.HooftL.DekkerF. W.ZoccaliC.JagerK. J.2009. “Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: When They Are Useful and When to Be Careful.” Kidney International76 (11): 1130–36.
47.
NoordzijM.ZoccaliC.DekkerF. W.JagerK. J.2011. “Adding up the Evidence: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.” Nephron Clinical Practice119 (4): C310–16.
48.
NorrisM.OppenheimC.RowlandF.2008. “Finding Open Access Articles Using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR.” Online Information Review32 (6): 709–15.
49.
OkoliC.SchabramK.2010. “A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research.” Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems10 (26).
50.
OnwuegbuzieAnthony J.LeechNancy L.CollinsKathleen M. T.2012. “Qualitative Analysis Techniques for the Review of the Literature.” Qualitative Report17.
51.
ParéGuyTrudelMarie-ClaudeJaanaMirouKitsiouSpyros. 2015. “Synthesizing Information Systems Knowledge: A Typology of Literature Reviews.” Information & Management52:183–99.
52.
PatersonBarbara L.CanamConnie. 2001. Meta-study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-analysis and Meta-synthesis, Vol. 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
PawsonR.GreenhalghT.HarveyG.WalsheK.2005. “Realist Review: A New Method of Systematic Review Designed for Complex Policy Interventions.” Journal of Health Services Research and Policy70 (1): 21–34.
54.
PetersM. D. J.GodfreyC. M.KhalilH.McInerneyP.ParkerD.SoaresC. B.2015. “Guidance for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews.” International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare13 (3): 141–46.
55.
PetticrewM.RobertsH.2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
56.
PopayJennieRobertsHelenSowdenAmandaPetticrewMarkAraiLisaRodgersMarkBrittenNickyRoenKatrinaDuffySteven. 2006. “Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews.” A product from the ESRC methods programme Version1:b92.
57.
RigolonAlessandro. 2016. “A Complex Landscape of Inequity in Access to Urban Parks: A Literature Review.” Landscape and Urban Planning153:160–69.
58.
RobertsKaren A.Dixon-WoodsMaryFitzpatrickRayAbramsKeith R.JonesDavid R.2002. “Factors Affecting Uptake of Childhood Immunisation: A Bayesian Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence.” The Lancet360 (9345): 1596–99.
59.
RousseauD. M.ManningJ.DenyerD.2008. “Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge through Syntheses.” In AIM Research Working Paper Series: Advanced Institute of Management Research.
60.
RowleyJenniferSlackFrances. 2004. “Conducting a Literature Review.” Management Research News27 (6): 31–39.
61.
SandelowskiMargareteBarrosoJulieVoilsCorrine I.2007. “Using Qualitative Metasummary to Synthesize Qualitative and Quantitative Descriptive Findings.” Research in Nursing & Health30 (1): 99–111.
62.
SandelowskiMargareteLeemanJennifer. 2012. “Writing Usable Qualitative Health Research Findings.” Qualitative Health Research22 (10): 1404–13.
63.
SandelowskiMargareteVoilsCorrine I.BarrosoJulie. 2006. “Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies.” Research in the Schools13 (1): 29–40.
64.
SchutzAlfred. 1962. “Collected Papers. Vol. 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1964.” Collected Papers2.
65.
SpiegelhalterDavidMylesJonathan P.JonesDavid R.AbramsKeith R.1999. “An Introduction to Bayesian Methods in Health Technology Assessment.” British Medical Journal319 (7208): 508.
66.
StanleyT. D.2001. “Wheat from Chaff: Meta-Analysis as Quantitative Literature Review.” Journal of Economic Perspectives15 (3): 131–50.
67.
StockWilliam A.BenitoJuana GomezLasaNekane Balluerka. 1996. “Research Synthesis: Coding and Conjectures.” Evaluation and the Health Professions19 (1): 104–17.
68.
SuriHarshClarkeDavid. 2009. “Advancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive Perspective.” Review of Educational Research79 (1): 395–430.
69.
SuttonAlex J.AbramsKeith R.2001. “Bayesian Methods in Meta-analysis and Evidence Synthesis.” Statistical Methods in Medical Research10 (4): 277–303.
70.
TemplierMathieuParéGuy. 2015. “A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, Article 6.
71.
ThomasJamesHardenAngela. 2008. “Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews.” BMC Medical Research Methodology8 (1): 1.
72.
Wanden-BergheC.Sanz-ValeroJ.2012. “Systematic Reviews in Nutrition: Standardized Methodology.” British Journal of Nutrition107:S3–S7.
73.
WebsterJaneWatsonRichard T.2002. “Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review.” MIS Quarterly26 (2): xiii–xiii.
74.
WeedMike. 2005. “‘Meta Interpretation’: A Method for the Interpretive Synthesis of Qualitative Research.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research.
75.
WeingroffRichard F.1996. “Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, Creating the Interstate System.” Public Roads60 (1).
76.
WhittemoreR.KnaflK.2005. “The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology.” Journal of Advanced Nursing52 (5): 546–53.
77.
WhittemoreRobinChaoArianaJangMyoungockMingesKarl E.ParkChorong. 2014. “Methods for Knowledge Synthesis: An Overview.” Heart & Lung43 (5): 453–61.
