Planners, officials, and neighborhood groups often debate zoning changes, yet there is little empirical evidence explaining why zoning and other land use regulations are changed. I use logistic regression models to examine density-enabling rezoning (“upzoning”) in Los Angeles. I find that upzoning occurs where there are development opportunities combined with limited political resistance. Upzoning is most likely on well-located parcels zoned for low-intensity, nonresidential uses. Meanwhile, homeowners—and particularly homeowners with access to valuable amenities—are associated with regulatory stasis. I conclude by recommending strategies for addressing homeowners’ concerns about higher density housing.
ChanelOlivierDelattreLaurenceNapoléoneClaude. 2014. “Determinants of Local Public Policies for Farmland Preservation and Urban Expansion: A French Illustration.”Land Economics90 (3): 411–33.
CooperChristopher A.NownesAnthony J.RobertsSteven. 2005. “Perceptions of Power: Interest Groups in Local Politics.”State & Local Government Review37 (3): 206–16.
19.
DeakinElizabeth. 1989. “Growth Controls and Growth Management: A Summary and Review of Empirical Research.” In Understanding Growth Management: Critical Issues and a Research Agenda. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
20.
DiPasqualeDeniseWheatonWilliam C. 1996. Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
DownsAnthony. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.”The Journal of Political Economy65 (2): 135–50.
22.
DubinJon C.1992. “From Junkyards to Gentrification: Explicating a Right to Protective Zoning in Low-Income Communities of Color.”Minnesota Law Review77:739–802.
EwingReid. 1997. “Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable?”Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 107–26.
25.
FischelWilliam A.2004. “An Economic History of Zoning and a Cure for Its Exclusionary Effects.”Urban Studies41 (2): 317–40.
26.
FischelWilliam A.2005a. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
FischelWilliam A.2005b. “Politics in a Dynamic View of Land-Use Regulations: Of Interest Groups and Homevoters.”Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics31 (4): 397–403.
28.
FriedenBernard J.1979. The Environmental Protection Hustle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
FultonWilliam B.2001. The Reluctant Metropolis: The Politics of Urban Growth in Los Angeles. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
FultonWilliam B.2005. Guide to California Planning, 3rd ed.Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
31.
GabbeCharles J.2016. “Do Land Use Regulations Matter? Why and How?” Doctoral Dissertation,University of California, Los Angeles.
32.
GalsterGeorge. 2001. “On the Nature of Neighbourhood.”Urban Studies38 (12): 2111–24.
33.
GlaeserEdward L.GyourkoJoseph. 2002. “The Impact of Zoning on Housing Affordability.” Working Paper 8835. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8835.
34.
GlaeserEdward L.GyourkoSaks. 2005. “Why Have Housing Prices Gone Up?” Working Paper 11129. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11129.
GyourkoJosephSaizAlbertSummersAnita. 2008. “A New Measure of the Local Regulatory Environment for Housing Markets: The Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index.”Urban Studies45 (3): 693–729.
37.
HapkeCherylReidDaveBorrelliMark. 2008. “The National Assessment of Shoreline Change: A GIS Compilation of Vector Cliff Edges and Associated Cliff Erosion Data for the California Coast.” USGS Western Coastal and Marine Geology. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1112/.
38.
HawkinsChristopher. 2014. “Competing Interests and the Political Market for Smart Growth Policy.”Urban Studies51 (12): 2503–22.
39.
HeberligEricLelandSuzanneReadDustin. 2014. “Local Politics, Organized Interests, and Land-Use Policy: A Research Note Analyzing the Perceptions of Urban Planners Working in City Government.”Urban Affairs Review50 (6): 890–903.
40.
HilbeJoseph M.2014. Modeling Count Data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
HilberChristian A. L.Robert-NicoudFrédéric. 2013. “On the Origins of Land Use Regulations: Theory and Evidence from US Metro Areas.”Journal of Urban Economics75 (May): 29–43.
42.
HirtSonia. 2007. “The Devil Is in the Definitions.”Journal of the American Planning Association73 (4): 436–50.
43.
HochCharles JDaltonLinda C.SoFrank S., eds. 2000. The Practice of Local Government Planning, 3rd ed.Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
44.
HosmerDavid W.LemeshowStanleySturdivantRodney X. 2013. Applied Logistic Regression. Third edition. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics 398. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
45.
LaddHelen F.1992. “Population Growth, Density and the Costs of Providing Public Services.”Urban Studies29 (2): 273–95.
46.
LaddHelen F.1994. “Fiscal Impacts of Local Population Growth: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis.”Regional Science and Urban Economics24 (6): 661–86.
47.
LandisJohn D.HoodHeatherLiGuangyuRogersThomasWarrenCharles. 2006. “The Future of Infill Housing in California: Opportunities, Potential, and Feasibility.”Housing Policy Debate17 (4): 681–725.
48.
LedwithValerie. 2010. “The Influence of Open Enrollment on Scholastic Achievement among Public School Students in Los Angeles.”American Journal of Education116 (2): 243–62.
LevineJonathan. 2006. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
51.
LewisPaul G.2001. “Retail Politics: Local Sales Taxes and the Fiscalization of Land Use.”Economic Development Quarterly15 (1): 21–35.
52.
LoganJohn R.MolotchHarvey Luskin. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
LoganJohn R.XuZengwangStultsBrian J. 2014. “Interpolating US Decennial Census Tract Data from as Early as 1970 to 2010: A Longitudinal Tract Database.”Professional Geographer66 (3): 412–20.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning. 2015. “About Transit Neighborhood Plans.”Los Angeles Transit Neighborhood Plans. http://www.latnp.org/about-the-project/.
57.
MisczynskiDean J.1986. “The Fiscalization of Land Use.”California Policy Choices3:127–50.
58.
MolotchHarvey. 1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.”American Journal of Sociology82 (2): 309–32.
59.
MorrowGregory D.2013. “The Homeowner Revolution: Democracy, Land Use and the Los Angeles Slow-Growth Movement, 1965-1992.” University of California, Los Angeles.
60.
PendallR.2000. “Local Land Use Regulation and the Chain of Exclusion.”Journal of the American Planning Association66 (2): 125–42.
61.
PogodzinskiJ. M.SassTim R. 1994. “The Theory and Estimation of Endogenous Zoning.”Regional Science and Urban Economics24 (5): 601–30.
62.
PosnerRichard A.1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation.” Working Paper 41. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w0041.
63.
PurcellMark. 2000. “The Decline of the Political Consensus for Urban Growth: Evidence from Los Angeles.”Journal of Urban Affairs22 (1): 85–100.
64.
QuigleyJohn M.Steven Raphael. 2005. “Regulation and the High Cost of Housing in California.”American Economic Review95 (2): 323–28.
65.
QuigleyJohn M.RosenthalLarry A.2005. “The Effects of Land Use Regulation on the Price of Housing: What Do We Know? What Can We Learn?”Cityscape8 (1): 69–137.
66.
RabinYale. 1990. “Expulsive Zoning: The Inequitable Legacy of Euclid.” In Zoning and the American Dream, edited by HaarCharles M.KaydenJerold S.Chicago: APA Planners Press.
67.
SaizAlbert. 2010. “The Geographic Determinants of Housing Supply.”Quarterly Journal of Economics125 (3): 1253–96.
68.
SchoneKatharinaKochWilfriedBaumontCatherine. 2011. “Modeling Local Growth Control Decisions in a Multi-City Case: Do Spatial Interactions and Lobbying Efforts Matter?”Public Choice154 (1/2): 95–117.
69.
SchwartzJonathan. 1997. “Prisoners of Proposition 13: Sales Taxes, Property Taxes, and the Fiscalization of Municipal Land Use Decisions.”S. Cal. L. Rev. 71: 183.
StiglerGeorge J.1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science2 (1): 3. doi:10.2307/3003160.
72.
UCLA Statistical Consulting Group. 2016. “Negative Binomial Regression.”UCLA Institute for Digital Research and Education. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/dae/nbreg.htm (Accessed June 24, 2016).
73.
United States Census Bureau.2000. “2000 United States Census.”
74.
United States Census Bureau.2013. “2013 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.”
75.
United States Department of Transportation. 2000. “Census Transportation Planning Package.” United States Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics. http://www.transtats.bts.gov/Tables.asp?DB_ID=630.
WarnerKeeMolotchHarvey Luskin. 2000. Building Rules: How Local Controls Shape Community Environments and Economies. Boulder, CO: Westview.
78.
WassmerRobert W.2002. “Fiscalisation of Land Use, Urban Growth Boundaries and Non-central Retail Sprawl in the Western United States.”Urban Studies39 (8): 1307–27.
79.
WhittemoreAndrew. 2010. “The Regulated City: The Politics of Land Use Regulation in Los Angeles, 1909-2009.” University of California, Los Angeles.
80.
WhittemoreAndrew H.2012. “Zoning Los Angeles: A Brief History of Four Regimes.”Planning Perspectives27 (3): 393–415. doi:10.1080/02665433.2012.681140.
ZukMiriamBierbaumAriel H.GorskaKarolinaThomasTrevorLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasiaOngPaulChappleKaren. 2015. “Gentrification, Displacement and the Role of Public Investment: A Literature Review.” Working Paper. San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
