Several cities have adopted form-based codes (FBCs) for downtown redevelopment. Using a multiple–case study method, this article examines the extent to which FBCs adopted by Southern California cities for downtown redevelopment differ from conventional zoning regulations (CZRs) in integrating LEED-ND criteria, which include sustainable design principles. Results show that FBCs generally integrate LEED-ND criteria to a greater extent than do the CZRs that they replaced; however, there is variation in the extent to which FBCs integrate these criteria. The article points to criteria that deserve more attention in these FBCs and presents recommendations for planners considering FBCs for downtown redevelopment.
BanerjeeT.VermaN.2005. “Sprawl and Segregation: Another Side of the Los Angeles Debate.” In Desegregating the City: Ghettos, Enclaves, and Inequality, edited by VaradyD., 200–12. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
BentivegnaV.1997. “Limitations in Environmental Evaluations.” In Evaluation of the Built Environment for Sustainability, edited by BrandonP. S.LombardiP. L.BentivegnaV., 25–38. London: E & FN Spon.
5.
BirchE. L.2009. “Downtown in the ‘New American City.’” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science626 (November): 134–53.
BurayidiM. A.2013. Resilient Downtowns: A New Approach to Revitalizing Small- and Medium-City Downtowns. New York: Routledge.
8.
CampoD.RyanB. D.2008. “The Entertainment Zone: Unplanned Nightlife and the Revitalization of the American Downtown.” Journal of Urban Design13 (3): 291–315.
DanielsT.2014. The Environmental Planning Handbook for Sustainable Communities and Regions. Chicago: American Planning Association, Planners Press.
18.
EwingR.BartholomewK.WinkelmanS.WaltersJ.ChenD.2007. Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change. Chicago: Urban Land Institute.
FogelsonR. M.2001. Downtown: Its Rise and Fall, 1880–1950. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
FordL. R.2003. America’s New Downtowns: Revitalization or Reinvention?Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
FriedenB. J.SagalynL. B.1989. Downtown, Inc.: How America Rebuilds Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
GardeA. M.2009. “Sustainable by Design? Insights from U.S. LEED-ND Pilot Projects.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (4): 424–40.
24.
GardeA. M.2016. “Affordable by Design? Inclusionary Housing Insights from Southern California.” Journal of Planning Education and Research36 (1): 16–31.
25.
GardeA. M.KimC.TsaiO.2015. “Differences between Miami’s Form-Based Code and Traditional Zoning Code in Integrating Planning Principles.” Journal of the American Planning Association81 (1): 46–66.
26.
Loukaitou-SiderisA.BanerjeeT.1998. Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
ParolekD. G.ParolekK.CrawfordP. C.2008. Form-Based Codes: A Guide for Planners, Urban Designers, and Developers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
28.
PulidoL.2000. “Rethinking Environmental Racism: White Privilege and Urban Development in Southern California.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers90 (1): 12–40.
29.
RobertsonK.1995. “Downtown Redevelopment Strategies in the United States: An End-of-the-Century Assessment.” Journal of the American Planning Association61 (4): 429–37.
30.
SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments). 2012. 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Los Angeles: Southern California Association of Governments.
31.
TalenE.2013. “Zoning for and against Sprawl: The Case for Form-Based Codes.” Journal of Urban Design18 (2): 175–200.
