This article examines how beneficiaries of Brazil’s Bolsa Família (BFP) conditional cash transfer program find employment in a Brazilian municipality and assesses their participation in decent work. Using Belo Horizonte as a case study, researchers conducted a survey of BFP recipients. The article compares responses of informally and formally employed workers to assess how their employment meets the criteria of the decent work agenda. Results indicate no significant difference between perceptions of formal and informal employees concerning discrimination and poor working conditions. Findings lead to recommendations about formalization of employment, coordination with existing job training programs, child care, and transportation.
de Andrade BaltarP. E.dos SantosA. L.LeoneJ. D.KreinE.ProniM. W.MorettoA.MaiaA. G.SalasC.2010. Moving towards Decent Work. Labour in the Lula Government: Reflections on Recent Brazilian Experience. No. 9. Global Labour University Working Paper.
de BarrosR. P.Corseuil.C. H.2004. “The Impact of Regulations on Brazilian Labor Market Performance.” In Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean, edited by HeckmanJames J.PagésCarmen, 273–350. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BoschiR. R.1999. “Descentralização, clientelismo e capital social na governança urbana: comparando Belo Horizonte e Salvador.”Dados42 (4): 655–90. Accessed November 15, 2015.
5.
de BrauwA.GilliganD.HoddinottJ.Roy.S.2015. “Bolsa Família and household labor supply.”Economic Development and Cultural Change63 (3): 423–57. Accessed November 15, 2015.
CarneiroP.GalassoE.Ginja.R.2015. Tackling Social Exclusion: Evidence from Chile (Policy Research Working Paper No. 7180). Washington, DC: World Bank.
8.
Carvalho FilhoI. E.Estevão.M. M.2012. Institutions, Informality, and Wage Flexibility: Evidence from Brazil (No. 12-84). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
9.
ChitolinaL.FoguelM. N.Menezes-Filho.N.2013. The Impact of the Expansion of the Bolsa Família Programme on the Time Allocation of Youths and Labour Supply of Adults (IPC-IG Working Paper 120). Brasília: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. Accessed August 6, 2016.
10.
CochranW. G.1977. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
11.
D’SouzaA.2010. “Moving towards Decent Work for Domestic Workers: An Overview of the ILO’s work.” Working paper, July20, 2010.
12.
FiszbeinA.Schady.N.2009. Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
13.
FoguelM. N.Paes de Barros.R.2010. “The Effects of Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes on Adult Labour Supply: An Empirical Analysis Using a Time-Series-Cross-Section Sample of Brazilian Municipalities.”Estudos Econômicos40 (2): 259–93.
14.
GomesA. V. M.2009. “The Effect of ILO’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work on the Evolution of Legal Policy in Brazil: An Analysis of Freedom of Association.” PhD diss., University of Toronto.
15.
GuimarãesJ. R. S.2013. Decent Work Country Profile: A Sub-national Perspective in Brazil. Brasília: International Labour Organization.
16.
ILO (International Labour Organization). 2013. World Report on Child Labour: Economic Vulnerability, Social Protection and the Fight against Child Labour. Geneva: ILO.
17.
ILO (International Labour Organization). 2014. World Social Protection Report 2014/15: Building Economic Recovery, Inclusive Development and Social Justice. Geneva: ILO.
KasunicM.2005. Defining an Effective Survey (Report). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.
22.
LarrañagaO.ContrerasD.Ruiz-Tagle.J.2012. “Impact Evaluation of Chile Solidario: Lessons and Policy Rec-ommendations.”Journal of Latin American Studies44:347–72.
23.
LuebkerM.2008. Decent Work and Informal Employment: A Survey of Workers in Glen View, Harare (ILO Working Paper No. 91). Geneva: ILO.
24.
MachadoA. F.FontesG. G.AntigoM. F.GonzalezR. H.Soares.F. V.2011. Assessment of the Implications of the Bolsa Família Programme on the Decent Work Agenda (IPC-IG Working Paper 85). Brasília: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. http://www.ipc-undp.org/publication/26755. Accessed October 14, 2015.
MotteB.AguileraA.BoninO.Nassi.C. D.2016. “Commuting Patterns in the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro. What Differences between Formal and Informal Jobs?”Journal of Transport Geography51:59–69.
27.
de Moura PalottiP. L.Costa.B. L. D.2011. “Relações intergovernamentais e descentralização.”Revista de Sociologia e Política19 (39): 211–35. Accessed November 15, 2015.
28.
Organization of American States, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, and International Labor Organization. 2010. Social Protection and Employment Generation: Analysis of Experiences from Co-responsibility Transfer Programs. Washington, DC: Organization of American States. http://socialprotectionet.org/sites/default/files/inter-agency_concept_document_l-19_nov_2010_english.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2015.
29.
RibasR. P.2014. “Liquidity Constraints, Informal Financing, and Entrepreneurship: Direct and Indirect Effects of a Cash Transfer Programme” (No. 131).
30.
RibasR. P.SoaresF. V.2011. “Is the Effect of Conditional Transfers on Labor Supply Negligible Everywhere?SSRN Electronic Journal 1728287.
SoaresF. V.RibasR. P.Osório.R. G.2010. “Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective.”Latin American Research Review45 (2): 173–90.
33.
SoaresS.de SouzaP. H. G. F.OsórioR. G.Silveira.F. G.2010. “Os Impactos do Benefício do Programa Bolsa Família sobre a Desigualdade e a Pobreza: As Condicionalidades do Programa Bolsa Família.” In Bolsa Família 2003-2010: Avanços e desafios—Volume 2, edited by de CastroJorge AbrahãoModestoLúcia. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Economica Aplicada.
34.
TapajósL.QuirogaJ.RitziR. B. S.de Lima Taga.M. F.2010. “A Importância da Avaliação no Contexto do Bolsa Família.” In Bolsa Família 2003-2010: Avanços e desafios—Volume 2, edited by de CastroJorge AbrahãoModestoLúcia. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Economica Aplicada.
35.
TavaresP. A.2010. “Efeito do Programa Bolsa Família sobre a oferta de trabalho das mães.”Revista Economia e Sociedade41:23.
36.
TchernevaP.Wray.L. R.2005. Employer of Last Resort: A Case Study of Argentina’s Jefes Program (CFEPS Working Paper 41). Kansas City: Center for Full Employment and Price Stability. http://www.cfeps.org/pubs/wp-pdf/WP41-Tcherneva-Wray-all.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2015.
37.
TchernevaP.Wray.L. R.2007. Public Employment and Women: The Impact of Argentina’s Jefes Program on Female Heads of Poor Households (Working Paper No. 519). Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
38.
TeixeiraC. G.2010. A Heterogeneity Analysis of the Bolsa Família Programme Effect on Men and Women’s Work Supply. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth Working Paper 61.
39.
United Nations General Assembly. 2016. Draft outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III). http://www.undocs.org/A/CONF.226/4. Accessed October 15, 2016.
40.
UN-Habitat. 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
41.
WernaE.2013. “Working in Green Cities: Improving the Urban Environment while Creating Jobs and Enhancing Working Conditions.” In The Economy of Green Cities, edited by SimpsonRichardZimmermannMonika. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.
YaschineI.Dávila.L.2008. “Why, When and How Should Beneficiaries Leave a CCT Programme?”Poverty In Focus15:8–9.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
