For many migrants and refugees, place provides a common sense of territorial identity despite these groups having roots elsewhere. Using the case of the Hmong diaspora, the following calls for a reconsideration of how place is theorized in planning and introduces the term “translocal placemaking” to better reflect new social formations and the overdetermination of locality. This relational conception of place captures the complexity of spatial and temporal relations as locales are not isolated from one another and draws attention to the various entanglements that historically shape spatial practices including the memories and ties to extralocal places.
AravotI.2002. “Back to Phenomenological Placemaking.” Journal of Urban Design7 (2): 201–12.
2.
ArefiM.2003. “Revisiting the Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative (LANI): Lessons for Planners.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (4): 384–99.
3.
ArefiM.TriantafillouM.2005. “Reflections on the Pedagogy of Place in Planning and Urban Design.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (1): 75–88.
4.
BluntA.DowlingR.2006. Home. London: Routledge.
5.
BoltonR.1992. “Place Prosperity vs People Prosperity’ Revisited: An Old Issue with a New Angle.” Urban Studies29 (2): 185–203.
6.
BotchweyN. D.TrowbridgeM.FisherT.2014. “Green Health: Urban Planning and the Development of Healthy and Sustainable Neighborhoods and Schools.” Journal of Planning Education and Research34 (2): 113–22.
CrangM.1998. Cultural Geography. London: Routledge.
9.
DattaA.2011. “Translocal Geographies of London: Belonging and ‘Otherness’ among Polish Migrants after 2004.” In Translocal Geographies: Spaces, Places, Connections, edited by BrickellK.DattaA., 73–92. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
10.
DeLandaM.2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
11.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF.1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
DoveyK.WoodcockI.WoodS.2009. “A Test of Character: Regulating Place-Identity in Inner-City Melbourne.” Urban Studies46 (12): 2595–2615.
14.
FlyvbjergB.2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry12 (2): 219–45.
15.
FriedmannJ.2010. “Place and Place-Making in Cities: A Global Perspective.” Planning Theory & Practice11 (2): 149–65.
16.
GuarnizoL. E.SmithM. P.1999. Transnationalism from below. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
17.
GudykunstW.Ting-ToomeyS.1988. Cultural and Interpersonal Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
HarveyD.1993. “From Space to Place and Back Again: Reflections on the Condition of Postmodernity.” In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, edited by BirdJ.CurtisB.PutnamT.TicknerL.London: Routledge.
19.
HealeyP.2010. Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty-First Century. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
HealeyP.UptonR.2010. Crossing Borders: International Exchange and Planning Practices. New York: Routledge.
21.
HeinJ.2006. Ethnic Origins: The Adaptation of Cambodian and Hmong Refugees in Four American Cities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
HillierJ.2005. “Straddling the Post-Structuralist Abyss: Between Transcendence and Immanence?” Planning Theory4 (3): 271–99.
23.
HillierJ.2007. Stretching beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
24.
HillierJ.2008. “Plan(e) Speaking: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory7 (1): 24–50.
25.
HillierJ.2009. “Assemblages of Justice: The ‘Ghost Ships’ of Graythorp.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33 (3): 640–61.
26.
HillierJ.2011a. “Strategic Navigation across Multiple Places: Towards a Deleuzean-Inspired Methodology for Strategic Spatial Planning.” Town Planning Review82 (5): 503–27.
27.
HillierJ.2011b. “Encountering Gilles Deleuze in Another Place.” European Planning Studies19 (5): 861–85.
28.
HillierJ.Van WezemaelJ.2007. “Opening up What May Yet Come: Performing Civic Engagement in a Complex World.” In Civic Engagement in a Network Society, edited by YangK.BergrudE.Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
29.
JacksonR.1999. The Negotiation of Cultural Identity. Westport, CT: Praeger.
30.
LagendijkA.BoertjesS.2013. “Light Rail: All Change Please! A Post-Structural Perspective on the Global Mushrooming of a Transport Concept.” Planning Theory12 (3): 290–310.
31.
MarkusenA.2013. “Fuzzy Concepts, Proxy Data: Why Indicators Would Not Track Creative Placemaking Success.” International Journal of Urban Science17 (3): 291–303.
32.
MainK.2012. “Planning in the Face of Anti-immigrant Sentiment: Latino Immigrants and Land Use Conflicts in Orange County, California.” In Dialogos: Placemaking in Latino Communities, edited by RiosM.VazquezL.New York: Routledge.
33.
MainK.SandovalG.2014. “Placemaking in a Translocal Receiving Community: The Relevance of Place to Identity and Agency.” Urban Studies doi:10.1177/0042098014522720.
34.
MasseyD.2005. For Space. London: Sage.
35.
McFarlaneC.2009. “Translocal Assemblages: Space, Power, and Social Movements.” Geoforum40:561–67.
36.
McFarlaneC.2011. “The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29:649–71.
37.
MehtaV.2007. “Lively Streets: Determining Environmental Characteristics to Support Social Behavior.” Journal of Planning Education and Research27 (2): 165–87.
38.
MiraftabF.2011. “Faraway Intimate Development: Global Restructuring of Social Reproduction.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (4): 392–405.
39.
MiyaresI.1997. “Changing Perceptions of Space and Place as Measures of Hmong Acculturation.” Professional Geographer49 (2): 214–24.
40.
MiyaresI.1998. The Hmong Refugee Experience in the United States: Crossing the River. New York: Garland.
41.
OngA.2003. Buddha Is Hiding: Refugees, Citizenship, the New America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
PageB.2011. “Fear of Small Distances: Home Associations in Douala, Dar es Salaam and London.” In Translocal Geographies: Spaces, Places, Connections, edited by BrickellK.DattaA.Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
43.
PassonC.LeviD.del RioV.2008. “Implications of Adolescents’ Perceptions and Values for Planning and Design.” Journal of Planning Education and Research28 (1): 73–85.
44.
PierceJ.MartinD. G.MurphyJ. T.2011. “Relational Place-Making: The Networked Politics of Place.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36:54–70.
45.
RouseR.1991. “Mexican Migration and the Social Space of Postmodernism.” Diaspora1 (1): 8–23.
46.
SandovalG.2012. “Transnational Placemaking in Small-Town America.” In Dialogos: Placemaking in Latino Communities, edited by RiosM.VazquezL.New York: Routledge.
47.
SandovalG.2013. “Shadow Transnationalism: Cross-border Networks and Planning Challenges of Transnational Unauthorized Immigrant Communities.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (2): 176–93.
48.
SchneeklothL. H.ShibleyR.1995. Placemaking: The Art and Practice of Building Community. New York: John Wiley.
49.
ShibleyR.SchneeklothL. H.HoveyB.2003. “Constituting the Public Realm of a Region: Placemaking in the Bi-National Niagaras.” Journal of Architectural Education57 (1): 28–42.
50.
SimoneA.2011. “The Urbanity of Movement: Dynamic Frontiers in Contemporary Africa.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (4): 379–91.
SpencerJ. H.2005. “How to Think about Place and People Approaches to Poverty: The Significance of the Earned Income Tax Credit as Neighborhood Investment.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (3): 292–303.
53.
SouthworthM.1985. “Shaping the City Image.” Journal of Planning Education and Research5 (1): 52–59.
54.
TalenE.CoffindafferM.1999. “The Utopianism of Children: An Empirical Study of Children’s Neighborhood Design Preferences.” Journal of Planning Education and Research18 (4): 321–31.
55.
TalenE.EllisC.2002. “Beyond Relativism: Reclaiming the Search for Good City Form.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (1): 36–49.
56.
Ting-ToomeyS.1999. Communicating across Cultures. New York: Guilford.
57.
TrappN.2010. The Impossibility of Self: An Essay on the Hmong Diaspora. Berlin: LIT.
58.
Van WezemaelJ.2008. “The Contribution of Assemblage Theory and Minor Politics for Democratic Network Governance.” Planning Theory7 (2): 165–85.
