The business improvement district (BID) model has been widely adopted as a place-based strategy for commercial renewal and sustainability. This study uses the National Establishment Time-Series (NETS) Database to estimate the impact of New York City BIDs on change in retail sales and change employment between 2000 and 2008. Since the self-financing mechanism of BIDs becomes a compulsory tax on retail tenants, this study examines whether the model improves retail performance relative to comparable areas of the city that never adopted BIDs. Although effects vary by BID size, retail sales and employment are depressed by small community BIDs.
BartikTimothy J.BinghamRichard D.1997. “Can Economic Development Programs Be Evaluated?” In Dilemmas of Urban Economic Development: Issues in Theory and Practice, edited by BinghamRichard D.MierRobert, 246–77. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BartikTimothy J.2007. “Solving the Problems of Economic Development Incentives.” In Reining in the Competition for Capital, edited by MarkusenAnn, 103–40. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
3.
BradshawTedBlakelyEdward. 1999. “What Are ‘Third Wave’ State Economic Development Efforts? From Incentives to Industrial Policy.” Economic Development Quarterly13 (3): 229–44.
4.
BriffaultRichard. 2010. “The Business Improvement District Comes of Age.” Drexel Law Review3 (1): 19–33.
5.
BriffaultRichard. 1999. “A Government for Our Time? Business Improvement Districts and Urban Governance.” Columbia Law Review99(2): 365–477.
6.
BrindisiFrancescoWilhelmLindsay M.2008 “Employment Dynamics and Relocation Patterns in New York City 1993-2006.” Paper prepared for the 55th Annual Meeting of the North American Regional Science Association, Brooklyn, NY, November 2008.
7.
BrooksLeah. 2008. “Volunteering to Be Taxed: Business Improvement Districts and the Extra-governmental Provision of Public Safety.” Journal of Public Economics92:388–406.
8.
BrownStephen. 1993. “Retail Location Theory: Evolution and Evaluation.” International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research3 (2): 185–229.
9.
CarusoGinaWeberRachel. 2006. “Getting the Max for the Tax: An Examination of BID Performance Measures.” International Journal of Public Administration29:187–219.
10.
Center for an Urban Future. 2010. “A Chain Reaction: This Year’s Borough-by-Borough Analysis of New York City’s Largest Retailers.” (December10), vol 1 issue 1.
11.
DawsonJ. A.KirbyD. A.1980. “Urban Retail Provision and Consumer Behavior: Some Examples from Western Society.” Geography and the Urban Environment3:87–132.
12.
DehejiaRajeev H.WahbaSadek. 1999. “Causal Effects in Non-experimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association94 (448): 1053–62.
13.
DehejiaRajeev H.WahbaSadek. 2002. “Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-experimental Causal Studies.” Review of Economics and Statistics84 (1): 151–61.
14.
EllenIngrid GouldSchwartzAmy EllenVoicuIoan. 2007. “The Impact of Business Improvement Districts on Property Values: Evidence from New York City.” Working Paper Series, The Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University.
15.
ElveryJoel A.2009. “The Impact of Enterprise Zones on Resident Employment an Evaluation of the Enterprise Zone Programs of California and Florida.” Economic Development Quarterly23 (1), 44–59.
16.
FoxEdwardPostrelStevenMcLaughlinAmanda. 2007. “The Impact of Retail Location on Retailer Revenues: An Empirical Investigation.” Mimeo, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.
17.
FriedlineTerri L.ElliottWilliamNamIlsung. 2011. “Predicting Savings from Adolescence to Young Adulthood: A Propensity Score Approach.” Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research2 (1): 1–22.
18.
FungAmanda.2011a. “Chinatown BID Moves a Step Closer to Takeoff.” Crain’s New York Business, March2, 2011 (online).
19.
FungAmanda.2011b. “Smaller BIDs Get Bigger Boost from City Hall.” Crain’s New York Business, June21, 2012 (online).
20.
FrungGerald E.2010. “The Seductions of Form.” Drexel Law Review, 3 (1): 11–17.
21.
Gopal-AggeDevikaHoytLorlene. 2008. “The Retail-Revitalization Nexus: The Business Improvement Model in Canada and the United States.” In Business Improvement Districts: Research, Theories and Controversies, edited by MorçölGoktugHoytLorleneMeekJack W.ZimmermannUlf. Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis.
22.
GrossJill. 2005. “Business Improvement Districts in New York City’s Low-Income and High-Income Neighborhoods.” Economic Development Quarterly19 (2): 174–89.
23.
HoffmanDanielHoustounLawrence O.Jr.2010. “Business Improvement Districts as a Tool for Improving Philadelphia’s Economy.” Drexel Law Review3 (1): 89–107.
24.
HoytLorlene. 2005. “Do Business Improvement District Organizations Make a Difference? Crime in and around Commercial Areas in Philadelphia.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25:185–99.
25.
HoytLorleneGopal-AggeDevika. 2007. “The Business Improvement District Model: A Balanced Review of Contemporary Debates.” Geography Compass1/4 (2007): 946–58.
26.
HuffD. L.1962. “Determination of Intra-Urban Retail Trade Areas.” Real Estate Research Program, Graduate Schools of Business Administration, University of California, Los Angeles.
27.
LefkowiczMelanie. 2010. “BIDS These Days: The Ups and Downs of Business Improvement Districts.” City Limits, October26.
28.
LevyPaul R.2001. “Paying for Public Life.” Economic Development Quarterly15 (2): 124–31.
29.
McLaughlinMike. 2008. “BID-ing War on Fulton Street.” Brooklyn Paper31 (48).
30.
MitchellJerry. 2001. “Business Improvement Districts and the ‘New’ Revitalization of Downtown.” Economic Development Quarterly, 15 (2): 115–23.
31.
MitchellJerry. 2008. Business Improvement Districts and the Shape of American Cities. Albany, NY: SUNY Series in Urban Public Policy.
32.
MorcolGogtugHoytLorlene MeekJackW.ZimmermannUlf, eds. 2008. Business Improvement Districts: Research, Theories, and Controversies. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach.
33.
NevinJohn R.Michael JHouston. 1980. “Image as a Component of Attraction to Intraurban Shopping Areas.” Journal of Retailing, 56 (1), 77–93.
34.
New York City Department of Small Business Services. 2009. “Starting a Business Improvement District: A Step-by-Step Guide.” Agency document.
35.
OakleyDeirdreTsaoHui-Shien. 2006. “A New Way of Revitalizing Distressed Urban Communities? Assessing the Impact of the Federal Empowerment Zone Program.” Journal of Urban Affairs28 (5): 443–71.
36.
O’KeefeSuzanne. 2004. “Job Creation in California’s Enterprise Zones: A Comparison Using a Propensity Score Matching Model.” Journal of Urban Economics55:131–50.
37.
ReeseLauraRosenfeldRaymond. 2004. “Local Economic Development in the United States and Canada: Institutionalizing Policy Approaches.” American Review of Public Administration September34 (3): 277–92.
38.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika70:41–55.
39.
SianesiBarbara. 2004. “An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s.” Review of Economics and Statistics86:133–55.
40.
StokesRobert. 2006. “Business Improvement Districts and Inner City Revitalization: The Case of Philadelphia’s Frankford Special Services District.” International Journal of Public Administration29:173–86.
41.
StokesRobert. 2010. “The Challenges of Using BIDs in Lower-Income Areas: The Case of Germantown, Philadelphia.” Drexel Law Review3 (1): 325–37.
42.
TellerChristophReuttererThomas. 2008. “The Evolving Concept of Retail Attractiveness: What Makes Retail Agglomerations Attractive When Customers Shop at Them?”Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services15:127–43.
