Researchers and advocates have linked state guidelines on minimum acreage for schools to the abandonment of historic schools and increased barriers to walking and biking to school. This study examined how the elimination of minimum acreage standards in four states affected school planning processes and outcomes using mixed methods. We found that states changed school acreage policies because of concerns about sprawl and the rising costs of education facilities. However, changes in state acreage policies have not been accompanied by changes in district-level school planning processes and therefore on-the-ground impacts have been minimal in the years immediately after the policy change.
BeaumontC. E.2003. State Policies and School Facilities: How States Can Support or Undermine Neighborhood Schools and Community Preservation. Washington, DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation.
3.
BeaumontC. E.PiancaE. G.2002. Historic Neighborhood Schools in the Age of Sprawl: Why Johnny Can’t Walk to School. Washington, DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation.
4.
Ben-JosephE.2005a. The Code of the City: Standards and the Hidden Language of Place Making. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
Ben-JosephE.2005b. On standards. In Regulating Place: Standards and the Shaping of Urban America, edited by Ben-JosephEranSzoldT. S., 1–13. New York: Routledge.
6.
California Department of Education. 2000. California Guide to School Site Analysis and Development. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
7.
Council of Educational Facility Planners, International. 2004. Creating Connections: The CEFPI Guide to Educational Facility Planning. Scottsdale, AZ: Council of Education Facility Planners International.
8.
Council of Educational Facility Planners, International, and Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Schools for Successful Communities: An Element of Smart Growth Planning. Scottsdale, AZ: Council of Education Facility Planners International.
9.
Division of Program Finance. 2003. Guide for Planning School Construction Projects in Minnesota. Minneapolis: Minnesota Department of Children Families & Learning.
10.
EwingR.GreeneW.2003. Travel and Environmental Implications of School Siting. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
11.
Federal Highway Administration. 2011. 2009 National Household Travel Survey User’s Guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
12.
FilardoM.ChengS.AllenM.BarM.UlsoyJ.2010. State Capital Spending on PK-12 School Facilities. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
13.
Georgia Department of Education. 2012. Guideline for Educational Facility Site Selection: 160-5-4-.16 (a) 6. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Education.
14.
Institute of Transportation Engineers. 1997. Traditional Neighborhood Development: Street Design Guidelines. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
15.
McClellandM.SchneiderK.2004. “Hard Lessons: Causes and Consequences of Michigan’s School Construction Boom.” Michigan Land Use Institute (February22).
16.
McDonaldN. C.2010. “School Siting: Contested Visions of the Community School.” Journal of the American Planning Association76 (2): 184–98.
17.
McDonaldN. C.2011. “School Siting in Suburban Areas: A Case Study of Maryland and Northern Virginia.” In School Siting and Healthy Communities: Why Where We Invest in School Facilities Matters, edited by MilesR.WyckoffM.AdelajaA., 27–38. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
18.
McDonaldN. C.BrownA. L.MarchettiL. M.PedrosoM. S.2011. “U.S. School Travel 2009: An Assessment of Trends.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine41 (2): 146–51.
19.
MilesR.2011. “Health Impacts of School Siting: An Analytical Framework.” In School Siting and Healthy Communities: Why Where We Invest in School Facilities Matters, edited by MilesR.AdelajaA.WyckoffM., 13–26. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
20.
MooreR.2006. “Playgrounds: A 150-Year-Old Model.” In Safe and Healthy School Environments, edited by FrumkinH.GellerR. J.RubinI. L.NodvinJ., 86–103. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
National Council on Schoolhouse Construction. 1964. Guide for Planning School Plants. Planning school plants. East Lansing: National Council on Schoolhouse Construction.
22.
New Hampshire Department of Education. 2006. Manual for Planning and Construction of School Buildings. Concord: New Hampshire Department of Education.
23.
NortonR. K.2007. “Planning for School Facilities: School Board Decision Making and Local Coordination in Michigan.” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (4): 478.
24.
SalvesenD.HerveyP.2003. Good Schools—Good Neighborhoods. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
25.
South Carolina Department of Education. n.d. Best Practices for Site Selection and Planning. Columbia: South Carolina Department of Education.
26.
SouthworthM.Ben-JosephE.2003. Streets and the Shaping of Towns and Cities. Washington DC: Island Press.
27.
StrayerG. D.EngelhardtN. L.1929. “Public Education and School Building Facilities.” In Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs, Volume VII. New York: Committee on Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs.
28.
TaylorJ. L.1958. School Sites: Selection, Development, and Utilization. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
29.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. School Siting Guidelines. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
30.
U.S. Green Building Council. 2011. LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Development. Washington, DC: U.S. Green Building Council.
31.
VincentJ. M.2006. “Public Schools as Public Infrastructure: Roles for Planning Researchers.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (4): 433–37.
32.
VincentJ. M.MonkkonenP.2010. “The Impact of State Regulations on the Costs of Public School Construction.” Journal of Education Finance35 (4): 313–30.
33.
WickershamJ. P.1871. School Economy: A Treatise on the Preparation, Organization, Employments, Government, and Authorities of Schools. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
34.
WyckoffM.AdelajaA.GibsonM. A.2011. “The Implications of School Location Change for Healthy Communities in a Slow-Growth State: A Case Study of Michigan.” In School Siting and Healthy Communities: Why Where We Invest in School Facilities Matters, edited by MilesR.AdelajaA.WyckoffM., 65–107. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
