This article examines the differences in diversity between a new urbanist subdivision and a standard suburban subdivision. We examine diversity at the macro level in terms of demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and income. We then examine diversity at the micro level, using a network sample to analyze diversity at the level of the social interaction. We find at the macro level that the new urbanist community is more diverse in a number of factors including education, income, and especially age. However, we find this increased diversity does not translate to diverse social interactions at the micro level.
AudiracI.1999. “Stated Preference for Pedestrian Proximity: An Assessment of New Urbanist Sense of Community.” Journal of Planning Education and Research19:53-66.
2.
BondS.Thompson-FawcettM.2007. “Public Participation and New Urbanism: A Conflicting Agenda?” Planning Theory and Practice8 (4): 449–72.
3.
BressiT.1994. “Planning the American Dream.” In The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, edited by KatzPeter, xxv–xlii. New York: McGraw Hill.
4.
BrophyPSmithR.1997. “Mixed-Income Housing: Factors for Success.” Cityscape3 (2): 3–31.
5.
BurtonL.PopkinS.LevyD.HarrisL.KhadduriJ.2002. The HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study: A Snapshot of the Current Living Situation of Original Residents from Eight Sites. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
6.
CabreraJ. F.2013. “New Urbanism and Selection Bias in the Formation of Social Capital.” Housing Policy Debate23 (2): 376–94.
7.
CalthorpeP.1994. “The Region.” In The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, edited by KatzPeter, xi–xvi. New York: McGraw Hill.
8.
Congress for the New Urbanism. 2000. Charter of the New Urbanism, edited by LecceseM.McCormickK.New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
DayK.2003. “New Urbanism and the Challenges of Designing for Diversity.” Journal of Planning Education and Research23:83–95.
10.
DuanyA.Platter-ZyberkE.1994. “The Neighborhood and the District.” In The New Urbanism, edited by KatzP.New York: McGraw Hill.
11.
DuanyA.Platter-ZyberkE.SpeckJ.2000. Suburban Nation: The Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Park Press.
12.
GrantJ. L.PerrottK.2009. “Producing Diversity in a New Urbanism Community: Policy and Practice.” Town Planning Review80 (3): 267–89.
13.
HanrattyM.McLanahanS.PettitB.2003. “Los Angeles Site Findings.” In Choosing a Better Life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity Social Experiment, edited by GoeringJohnFeinsJudith, 245–74. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
14.
JacobsJ.1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
15.
KatzP.1994. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
KimJ.KaplanR.2004. “Physical and Psychological Factors in Sense of Community: New Urbanist Kentlands and Nearby Orchard Village.” Environment and Behavior36 (3): 313–40.
17.
KleitR.2005. “HOPE VI New Communities: Neighborhood Relationships in Mixed Income Housing.” Environment and Planning37: 1413–41.
18.
KushnerJ. A. 2002–2003. “Smart Growth, New Urbanism and Diversity: Progressive Planning Movements in America and Their Impact on Poor Minority Ethnic Populations. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy45 (1): 45–74.
19.
LundH.2002. Pedestrian Environments and Sense of Community. Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (3): 301–12.
20.
LundH.2003. “Testing the Claims of New Urbanism: Local Access, Pedestrian Travel and Neighboring Behaviors.” Journal of the American Planning Association69 (4):414–29.
21.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
22.
MouleE.PolyzoidesS.1994. “The Street, the Block, and the Building.” The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, edited by KatzPeter, xxi–xxiv. New York: McGraw Hill.
23.
NydenP.MalyM.LukehartJ.1997. “The Emergence of Stable Racially and Ethnically Diverse Urban Communities: A Case Study of Nine U.S. Cities.” Housing Policy Debate8 (2): 491–534.
24.
PlasJ.M.LewisS. E.1996. ”Environmental Factors and Sense of Community in a Planned Town.” American Journal of Community Psychology24 (1): 109–43.
25.
PodobnikB.2002. “New Urbanism and the Generation of Social Capital: Evidence from Orenco Station.” National Civic Review91 (3): 245–55.
26.
PutnamR.2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century: the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies30 (3): 137–74.
27.
RosenbaumJ. E.StrohL. K.FlynnC. A.1998. “La Parc Place: A Study of Mixed-Income Housing.” Housing Policy Debate9 (4): 703–40.
28.
RosenbaumJ. E.HarrisL.DentonN.2003. “New Places, New Faces: An Analysis of Neighborhoods and Social Ties among MTO Movers in Chicago.” In Choosing a Better Life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity Social Experiment, edited by GoeringJohnFeinsJudith, 275–310. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
29.
SchaeferD. R.2010. “A Configurational Approach to Homophily Using Lattice Visualization.” Connections31:21–39.
30.
SongY.KnaapG. J.2003. “New Urbanism and Housing Values: A Disaggregate Assessment.” Journal of Urban Economics54:218–38.
31.
SongY.KnaapG. J.2004. “Measuring the Effects of Mixed Land Uses on Housing Values.” Regional Science and Urban Economics34:663–80.
32.
TalenE.1999. “Sense of Community and Neighbourhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism.” Urban Studies36 (8): 1361–79.
33.
TalenE.2005. “Land Use Zoning and Human Diversity: Exploring the Connection.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development131 (4): 214–32.
34.
TalenE.2010. “Affordability in New Urbanist Development: Principle, Practice, and Strategy.” Journal of Urban Affairs32 (4): 489–510.
35.
TuC. C.EppliM. J.1999. “Valuing New Urbanism: The Case of Kentlands.” Real Estate Economics27 (3): 425–51.
36.
TuC. C.EppliM. J.2001. “An Empirical Examination of Traditional Neighborhood Development.” Real Estate Economics29 (3): 485–501.
37.
TurnerM.RawlingsL.2009. “Promoting Neighborhood Diversity: Benefits, Barriers, and Strategies.” The Urban Institute, August.
