Critical infrastructure such as hazardous liquid and natural gas transmission pipelines has received little attention by planning scholars even though local development management decisions have far-reaching consequences for homeland security, environmental damage, and human exposure. Using a survey of planning directors in North Carolina, the article identifies frequently used tools for mitigating pipeline hazards and examines factors associated with tool adoption. Despite the risks associated with pipeline rupture, most localities use few mitigation tools, and adoption of regulatory and informational tools appear associated with divergent factors. Whereas stakeholder participation, commitment, capacity, and community context were associated with total tool and information tool use, only stakeholder participation and capacity factors were associated with regulatory tool use.
AndrewsR.1987. “Local Planners and Hazardous Materials.” Journal of the American Planning Association53 (1): 3–5.
5.
BaldassareM.HoeneC.2002. “Coping with Homeland Security: Perceptions of City Officials in California and the United States.” Paper read at Congress of Cities and Exposition, December 6, 2002, at Salt Lake City, UT.
6.
BengstonD.FletcherJ.NelsonK.2004. “Public Policies for Managing Urban Growth and Protecting Open Space: Policy Instruments and Lessons Learned in the United States.” Landscape and Urban Planning69 (2–3): 271–86.
7.
BerkeP. R.BeatleyT.WilhiteS.1989. “Influences on Local Adoption of Planning Measures for Earthquake Hazard Mitigation.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters7 (1): 33–56.
8.
BerkeP. R.CrawfordJ.DixonJ.EricksenN.1999. “Do Cooperative Environmental Planning Mandates Produce Good Plans? Empirical Results from the New Zealand Experience.” Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design26 (5): 643–64.
9.
BerkeP. R.FrenchS. P.1994. “The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local-Plan Quality.” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13 (4): 237–50.
10.
BerkeP. R.MacdonaldJ.WhiteN.HolmesM.LineD.OuryK.RyznarR.2003. “Greening Development to Protect Watersheds: Does New Urbanism Make a Difference?”Journal of the American Planning Association69 (4): 397–414.
11.
BerkeP. R.RoenigkD. J.KaiserE. J.BurbyR. J.1996. “Enhancing Plan Quality: Evaluating the Role of State Planning Mandates for Natural Hazard Mitigation.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management39 (1): 79–96.
12.
BinneyS.MasonR.MartsolfS.DetweilerJ.1996. “Credibility, Public Trust, and the Transport of Radioactive Waste through Local Communities.” Environment and Behavior28 (3): 283–301.
13.
BirklandT.1998. “Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting.” Journal of Public Policy18 (1): 53–74.
14.
BooneC. G.ModarresA.1999. “Creating a Toxic Neighborhood in Los Angeles County: A Historical Examination of Environmental Inequity.” Urban Affairs Review35 (2): 163–87.
15.
BrodyS.2003. “Are We Learning to Make Better Plans? A Longitudinal Analysis of Plan Quality Associated with Natural Hazards.” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23 (2): 191–201.
16.
BrodyS.CarrascoV.HighfieldW.2006. “Measuring the Adoption of Local Sprawl: Reduction Planning Policies in Florida.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (3): 294–310.
17.
BrodyS.HighfieldW.CarrascoV.2003. “Measuring the Collective Planning Capabilities of Local Jurisdictions to Manage Ecological Systems in Southern Florida.” Landscape and Urban Planning69 (1): 33–50.
18.
BrodyS.KangJ.BernhardtS.2010. “Identifying Factors Influencing Flood Mitigation at the Local Level in Texas and Florida: The Role of Organizational Capacity.” Natural Hazards52 (1): 1–18.
19.
BurbyR. J.1998. “Policies for Sustainable Land Use.” In Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, edited by BurbyR. J., 263–91. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
20.
BurbyR. J.2003. “Making Plans That Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action.” Journal of the American Planning Association69 (1): 33–49.
21.
BurbyR. J.2006. “Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing about Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604 (1): 171–91.
22.
BurbyR. J.DaltonL. C.1994. “Plans Can Matter: The Role of Land-Use Plans and State Planning Mandates in Limiting the Development of Hazardous Areas.” Public Administration Review54 (3): 229–38.
23.
BurbyR. J.MayP. J.1997. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
BurbyR. J.MayP. J.1998. “Intergovernmental Environmental Planning: Addressing the Commitment Conundrum.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management41 (1): 95–110.
25.
BurbyR. J.OkunD.1983. “Land Use Planning and Health.” Annual Review of Public Health4 (1): 47–67.
26.
ClarkR.DeiningerR.2000. “Protecting the Nation’s Critical Infrastructure: The Vulnerability of U. S. Water Supply Systems.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management8 (2): 73–80.
27.
Code Federal Regulations. 2006. “Title 49: Transportation.” Chaps. 100–199. Accessed April 21, 2006. www.ecfr.gov.
28.
Common Ground Alliance. 2003. Best Practices, Version 1.0. Washington, DC: CGA.
29.
CooperB. S.2003. “Policy Issues in Encroachment and Pipeline Rights of Way.” In National Academies Transportation Research Board Committee for Pipelines and Public Safety. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute and Association for Oil Pipe Lines.
30.
CutterS. L.SoleckiW. D.1996. “Setting Environmental Justice in Space and Place: Acute and Chronic Airborne Toxic Releases in the Southeastern United States.” Urban Geography17 (5): 380–99.
31.
DaltonL. C.1989. “The Limits of Regulation: Evidence from Local Plan Implementation in California.” Journal of the American Planning Association55 (2): 151–68.
32.
DaltonL. C.BurbyR. J.1994. “Mandates, Plans, and Planners: Building Local Commitment to Development Management.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 60 (4): 444–61.
33.
DashN.PeacockW.MorrowB. H.2001. “And the Poor Get Poorer.” In Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, edited by PeacockW. G.MorrowB. H.GladwinH., 206–25. Miami: International Hurricane Center, Laboratory for Social and Behavioral Research.
34.
DeyleR. E.ChapinT. S.BakerE. J.2008. “The Proof of the Planning Is in the Platting: An Evaluation of Florida’s Hurricane Exposure Mitigation Planning Mandate.” Journal of the American Planning Association74 (3): 349–70.
35.
DeyleR. E.FrenchS. P.OlshanskyR.PatersonR. G.1998. “Hazard Assessment: The Factual Basis for Planning and Mitigation.” In Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-use Planning for Sustainable Communities, edited by BurbyR. J., 119–66. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
36.
DillmanD. A.2000. Mail and Internet Surveys, the Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley.
37.
DownsA.2005. “Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More Than We Do It.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (4): 367–78.
38.
FeiockR.TavaresA.LubellM.2008. “Policy Instrument Choices for Growth Management and Land Use Regulation.” Policy Studies Journal36 (3): 461–80.
39.
FeiockR. C.2004. “Politics, Institutions and Local Land-Use Regulation.” Urban Studies41 (2): 363–75.
40.
FrankL.KavageS.2008. “Urban Planning and Public Health: A Story of Separation and Reconnection.” Journal of Public Health Management and Practice14 (3): 214–20.
41.
FultonW.PendellR.NguyenM.HarrisonA.2001. Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
42.
GerberB. J.CohenD. B.CannonB.PattersonD.StewartK.2005. “On the Front Line: American Cities and the Challenge of Homeland Security Preparedness.” Urban Affairs Review41 (2): 182–210.
GodschalkD. R.BrodyS.BurbyR. J.2003. “Public Participation in Natural Hazard Mitigation Policy Formation: Challenges for Comprehensive Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management46 (5): 733–54.
45.
GodschalkD. R.KaiserE. J.BerkeP. R.1998. “Integrating Hazard Mitigation and Local Land Use Planning.” In Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, edited by BurbyR. J., 85–118. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
46.
HandmerJ.1996. “Policy Design and Local Attributes for Flood hazard Management.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management4 (4): 189–97.
47.
HaynesK.BarclayJ.PidgeonN.2007. “Volcanic Hazard Communication Using Maps: An Evaluation of Their Effectiveness.” Bulletin of Volcanology70 (2): 123–38.
48.
HolwayJ. M.BurbyR. J.1990. “The Effects of Floodplain Development Controls on Residential Land Values.” Land Economics66 (3): 259–71.
49.
InnesJ. E.1996. “Planning through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal.” Journal of the American Planning Association62 (4): 460–72.
50.
JacobsH.1999. “Fighting over Land.” Journal of the American Planning Association65 (2): 141–49.
51.
JuergensmeyerJ. C.RobertsT. E.2003. Land Use Planning and Development Regulation Law. St. Paul, MN: West Group.
52.
KaplanR.KaplanS.AustinM.2008. “Factors Shaping Local land Use Decisions: Citizen Planners’ Perceptions and Challenges.” Environment and Behavior40 (1): 46–71.
53.
LaurianL.DayM.BackhurstM.BerkeP. R.EricksenN.CrawfordJ.DixonJ.ChapmanS.2004. “What Drives Plan Implementation? Plans, Planning Agencies and Developers.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management47 (4): 555–77.
54.
LeachW.2006. “Collaborative Public Management and Democracy: Evidence from Western Watershed Partnerships.” Public Administration Review 66 (Suppl 1): 100–10.
55.
LindellM. K.MeierM. J.1994. “Planning Effectiveness: Effectiveness of Community Planning for Toxic Chemical Emergencies.” Journal of the American Planning Association60 (2): 222–34.
56.
LindellM. K.PerryR. W.1992. Behavioral Foundations of Community Emergency Planning. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
57.
LindellM. K.PerryR. W.1996. “Identifying and Managing Conjoint Threats: Earthquake-Induced Hazardous Materials Releases in the US.” Journal of Hazardous Materials50 (1): 31–46.
58.
LindellM. K.PerryR. W.2001. “Community Innovation in Hazardous Materials Management: Progress in Implementing SARA Title III in the United States.” Journal of Hazardous Materials88 (2–3): 169–94.
59.
LongJ. S.1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
LovettA. A.ParfittJ. P.BrainardJ. S.1997. “Using GIS in Risk Analysis: A Case Study of Hazardous Waste Transport.” Risk Analysis17 (5): 625–33.
61.
MaantayJ.2001. “Zoning, Equity, and Public Health.” American Journal of Public Health91 (7): 1033–41.
62.
MayP.1991a. “Addressing Public Risks: Federal Earthquake Policy Design.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management10 (2): 263–85.
63.
MayP.1991b. “Reconsidering Policy Design: Policies and Publics.” Journal of Public Policy11 (2): 187–206.
64.
MayP.BirklandT.1994. “Earthquake Risk Reduction: An Examination of Local Regulatory Efforts.” Environmental Management18 (6): 923–37.
65.
McGuireM.2006. “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It.” Public Administration Review66 (Suppl 1): 33–43.
66.
MeadK.2004. Action Taken and Actions Needed to Improve Pipeline Safety, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Railroads of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Department of Transportation, 107th Congress (1st session, June 16):1–22.
67.
MerkhoferM.ConwayR.AndersonR.1997. “Multiattribute Utility Analysis as a Framework for Public Participation in Siting a Hazardous Waste Management Facility.” Environmental Management21 (6): 831–39.
68.
MorrowB. H.1999. “Identifying and Mapping Community Vulnerability.” Disasters23 (1): 1–18.
69.
MoteffJ.ParfomakP.2004. Critical Infrastructure and Key Assets: Definition and Identification (RL32631). Library of Congress. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/index.html (accessed December 2, 2009).
70.
NelsonA. C.FrenchS. P.2002. “Plan Quality and Mitigating Damage from Natural Disasters—A Case Study of the Northridge Earthquake with Planning Policy Considerations.” Journal of the American Planning Association68 (2): 194–207.
71.
NollG. G.HildebrandM. S.2004. Pipeline Emergencies. Chester: Red Hat.
72.
NortonR.2005. “Local Commitment to State-Mandated Planning in Coastal North Carolina.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (2): 149–71.
73.
NTSB. 2002. Pipeline Rupture and Subsequent Fire in Bellingham, Washington, June10, 1999, NTSB/PAR-02/02. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board.
NTSB. 2009. Rupture of Hazardous Liquid Pipeline with Release and Ignition of Propane Carmichael, Mississippi, November1, 2007, NTSB/PAR-09/01. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board.
76.
NunnS.2003. “Public Infrastructure, Private Built Investment, and Local Planning Capacity: An Examination of Linkages in the Central Indiana Region, 1990-2000.” Public Works Management & Policy8 (1): 48–61.
77.
O’ConnellL.2009. “The Impact of Local Supporters on Smart Growth Policy Adoption.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (3): 281–91.
78.
OlshanskyR.KartezJ.1998. “Managing Land Use to Build Resistance.” In Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, edited by BurbyR. J., 167–201. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
79.
OlshanskyR. B.2001. “Land Use Planning for Seismic Safety: The Los Angeles County experience, 1971-1994.” Journal of the American Planning Association67 (2): 173–85.
80.
OslandA.2011. “An Analysis of Land Use Planning and Equity Issues Surrounding Hazardous Liquid and Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines in North Carolina.” Dissertation, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
81.
ParfomakP.2006. Pipeline Safety and Security: Federal Programs. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress: Library of Congress, April (RL33347):1–14.
82.
PatesJ.1996a. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: What Every Local Government Should Know about Pipeline Safety.” Paper read at International Municipal Attorneys Association, October 8, 1996, at Little Rock, Arkansas.
83.
PatesJ.1996b. “Reducing the Risk of Oil Pipeline Accidents: The Virginia Experience.” Paper read at Environment Virginia 1996 Symposium, April 11-12, 1996, at Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, Virginia.
84.
PearceL.2003. “Disaster Management and Community Planning, and Public Participation: How to Achieve Sustainable Hazard Mitigation.” Natural Hazards28 (2–3): 211–28.
85.
PejcharL.MorganP.CaldwellM.PalmerC.DailyG.2007. “Evaluating the Potential for Conservation Development: Biophysical, Economic, and Institutional Perspectives.” Conservation Biology21 (1): 69–78.
86.
PendallR.2000. “Local Land Use Regulation and the Chain of Exclusion.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (2): 125–42.
87.
PHMSA Office of Pipeline Safety. 2005. FOIA On-line Library: Distribution, Transmission, and Liquid Accident and Incident Data. http://ops.dot.gov/stats/IA98.htm (accessed June 18, 2007).
PraterC.LindellM.2000. “Politics of Hazard Mitigation.” Natural Hazards Review1 (2): 73–82.
92.
ProtashW.BaldassareM.1983. “Growth Policies and Community Status: A Test and Modification of Logan’s Theory.” Urban Affairs Review18 (3): 397–412.
93.
QianZ.2010. “Without Zoning: Urban Development and Land Use Controls in Houston.” Cities27 (1): 31–41.
94.
ReddickC.2007. “Homeland Security Preparedness and Planning in US City Governments: A Survey of City Managers.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management15 (3): 157–67.
95.
ReddickC.2008. “Collaboration and Homeland Security Preparedness: A Survey of US City Managers.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management5 (1): 1–19.
96.
RogersG.SorensenJ.1989. “Warning and Response in Two Hazardous Materials Transportation Accidents in the U.S.” Journal of Hazardous Materials22 (1): 57–74.
97.
RusinM.Savvides-GellersonE.1987. The Safety of Interstate Liquid Pipelines: An Evaluation of Present Levels and Proposals for Change. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.
98.
ScanlonJ.1999. “Emergent Groups in Established Frameworks: Ottawa Carleton’s Response to the 1998 Ice Disaster.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management7 (1): 30–37.
99.
SchwabJ.1998. Planning for Post-disaster Recovery and Reconstruction. Chicago: American Planning Association.
100.
SchwabJ., ed. 2010. Hazard Mitigation: Integrating Best Practices into Planning. Chicago: American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service.
101.
SimonoffJ.RestrepoC.ZimmermanR.NaphtaliZ.2008. “Analysis of Electrical Power and Oil and Gas Pipeline Failures.” In Critical Infrastructure Protection, edited byGoetzE.ShenoiS., 381–94. Boston: Springer.
102.
SlovicP.2000. “Informing and Educating the Public about Risk.” In The Perception of Risk, edited by SlovicP., 182–98. London: Earthscan.
103.
SquiresG. D.KubrinC. E.2005. “Privileged Places: Race, Uneven Development and the Geography of Opportunity in Urban America.” Urban Studies42 (1): 47–68.
104.
State Energy Office, North Carolina Department of Administration, and Appalachian State University Energy Center. 2005. North Carolina State Energy Plan, June 2003. Revised January 2005 ed. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Administration.
105.
SteelB.LovrichN.2000. “Growth Management Policy and County Government: Correlates of Policy Adoption across the United States.” State & Local Government Review32 (1): 7–19.
106.
StevensM.2010. “Implementing Natural Hazard Mitigation Provisions: Exploring the Role That Individual Land Use Planners Can Play.” Journal of Planning Literature24 (4): 362–71.
107.
StevensM. R.SongY.BerkeP. R.2009. “New Urbanist Developments in Flood-Prone Areas: Safe Development, or Safe Development Paradox?”Natural Hazards53 (3): 605–29.
108.
StrongA.MandelkerD.KellyE.1996. “Property Rights and Takings.” Journal of the American Planning Association62 (1): 5–16.
109.
TarlockA.2002. “The Potential Role of Local Governments in Watershed Management.” Pace Environmental Law Review20 (1): 149–76.
110.
Transportation Research Board. 1988. Pipelines and Public Safety: Damage Prevention, Land Use and Emergency Preparedness, Special Report 219. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
111.
Transportation Research Board. 2004. Transmission Pipelines and Land Use: A Risk Informed Approach, Special Report 281. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
112.
TroyA.RommJ.2004. “Assessing the Price Effects of Flood Hazard Disclosure under the California Natural Hazard Disclosure Law (AB 1195).” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management47 (1): 137–62.
113.
U.S. Department of Transportation. 1999. National Pipeline Mapping System, Metadata Identification Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety.
114.
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot Act) Act of 2001. 107th United States Congress, October26, 2001.
115.
VedungE.1998. “Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories.” In Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, edited by Bemelmans-VidecM.RistR.VedungE., 21–58. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
116.
WisnerB.BlaikieP.CannonT.Davis.I.2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
117.
WoodN. J.GoodJ. W.2004. “Vulnerability of Port and Harbor Communities to Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards: The Use of GIS in Community Hazard Planning.” Coastal Management32: 243–69.
