This research explores how residents perceive the relationships between residential development patterns and the natural environment. Based on a fall 2004 survey of 283 residents from urban, suburban, exurban, and conservation neighborhoods in Michigan’s Washtenaw and Livingston Counties, this research indicates that residents may not have a clear understanding of the environmental impacts of residential development. The results suggest a need for environmental education especially with regard to the land development and water quality relationship and the impacts of large-lot, automobile-dependent developments. The study also suggests that further research is needed on the relationship between land development and the environment.
Alberti, M.1999. Urban patterns and environmental performance: What do we know? Journal of Planning Education and Research19 (2): 151-63.
2.
Alberti, M.2000. Urban form and ecosystem dynamics: Empirical evidence and practical implications. In Achieving sustainable urban form, ed. K. Williams, E. Burton, and M. Jenks.London: E & FN Spon.
3.
Arendt, R.G.1996. Conservation design for subdivisions: A practical guide to creating open space networks. Washington, DC: Island Press.
4.
Arendt, R.G.1999. Growing greener: Putting conservation into local plans and ordinances. Washington, DC: Island Press.
5.
Arnold, C.L., Jr., and J.C. Gibbons.1996. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association62 (2): 243-58.
6.
Beatley, T.1994. Reconciling urban growth and endangered species: The Coachella Valley habitat conservation plan. In The ecological city, ed. R. H. Platt, R. A. Rowntree, and P. C. Muick.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
7.
Brabec, E., S. Shulte, and P.L. Richards.2002. Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning . Journal of Planning Literature16 (4): 499-514.
8.
Breheny, M.J.1992. The contradictions of the compact city: A review . In Sustainable development and urban form, ed. Michael J. Breheny.London: Pion.
9.
Congress for the New Urbanism.2000. Charter for the New Urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Crump, J.R.2003. Finding a place in the country: Exurban and suburban development in Sonoma County, California. Environment and Behavior35 (2): 187-202.
11.
Danielsen, K.A., R.E. Lang, and W. Fulton.1999. Retracting suburbia: Smart growth and the future of housing. Housing Policy Debate10 (3): 513-40.
12.
Davis, J.S., A.C. Nelson, and K.J. Dueker.1994. The new burbs: The exurbs and their implications for planning policy. Journal of the American Planning Association60 (1): 45-59.
13.
Diamond, H.L., and P.F. Noonan.1996. Land use in America. Washington, DC: Island Press.
14.
Donnelly, R., and J.M. Marzluff.2004. Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conservation Biology18 (3): 733-45.
15.
Downs, A.2004. Still stuck in traffic: Coping with peak-hour traffic congestion. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16.
Ewing, R.H.1997. Is Los Angeles style sprawl desirable? Journal of American Planning Association63 (1): 107-25.
17.
Göçmen, Z.A., and R.W. Marans.2003. Conflicting views: Growth attitudes and residential preferences. Paper presented at Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries in the Urban and Regional Context Symposium , Ann Arbor, MI.
18.
Hough, M.2004. Cities and natural process: A basis for sustainability . 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
19.
Johnson, M.P.2001. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A33:717-35.
20.
Kaplan, R., M.E. Austin, and S. Kaplan.2004. Open space communities: Resident perceptions, nature benefits, and problems with terminology. Journal of the American Planning Association70 (3): 300-312.
21.
King, R.S., M.E. Baker, D.F. Whigham, D.E. Weller, T.E. Jordan, P.F. Kazyak, and M.K. Hurd.2005. Spatial considerations for linking watershed land cover to ecological indicators in streams. Ecological Applications15 (1): 137-53.
22.
Krizek, K.2001. Relationships between neighborhood-scale urban form, travel behavior, and residential location: Implications for land use and transportation planning and policy. PhD diss., University of Washington , Seattle.
23.
Laiela, I., G. Tomasky, J. Hauxwell, M.I. Cole, J. Cebrian, and K.D. Kroeger.2000. Operationalizing sustainability: Management and risk assessment of land-derived nitrogen loads to estuaries. Ecological Applications10 (4): 1006-23.
24.
Levine, J., A. Inam, and G. Torng.2005. A choice-based rationale for land use and transportation alternatives: Evidence from Boston and Atlanta. Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (3): 317-30.
25.
Liu, X., and J. Rogers.1999. Land use and land development in southeast Michigan. Detroit: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.
26.
Maestas, J.D., R.L. Knight, and W.C. Gilbert.2003. Biodiversity across a rural land-use gradient. Conservation Biology17 (5): 1425-34.
27.
Marcouiller, D.W., J.G. Clendenning, and R. Kedzior.2002. Natural amenity-led development and rural planning. Journal of Planning Literature16 (4): 515-42.
28.
Marsh, W.M., and J. Grossa Jr.1996. Environmental geography: Science, land use, and earth systems. Toronto, Canada: John Wiley.
29.
McNemar, Q.1947. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika12 (2): 153-57.
30.
Nassauer, J.I., J.D. Allan, T. Johengen, S.E. Kosek, and D. Infante.2004. Exurban residential subdivision development: Effects on water quality and public perception. Urban Ecosystems7 (3): 267-81.
31.
National Association of Home Builders.2005 . Housing facts. www.nahb.org/publication_details.aspX?SectionID=702&publicationID=2028 (accessed April 2005).
32.
Odell, E.A., and R.L. Knight.2001. Songbird and medium-sized mammal communities associated with exurban development in Pitkin County, Colorado. Conservation Biology15 (4): 1143-50.
33.
Odell, E.A., D. Theobald, and R.L. Knight.2003. Incorporating ecology into land use planning: The songbirds case for clustered development. Journal of the American Planning Association69 (1): 72-82.
34.
Orrskog, L., and F. Snickars.1992. On the sustainability of urban and regional structures. In Sustainable development and urban form , ed. M. J. Breheny.London: Pion.
35.
Owens, S.1986. Energy, planning and urban form. London : Pion.
36.
Radeloff, V.C., R.B. Hammer, and S.I. Stewart.2005. Rural and suburban sprawl in the U.S. Midwest from 1940 and 2000 and its relation to forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology19 (3): 793-805.
37.
Rickaby, P.A.1987. Six settlement patterns compared. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design14:193-223.
38.
Rogers, J., E. Limoges, J. Jones, J. Nutting, and G. Rowe.1998. The past and future growth of southeast Michigan: Population, households, jobs and land use. Detroit : Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.
39.
Schueler, T.1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques1 (3): 100-111.
40.
Song, Y., and G. Knaap.2004. Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl?Journal of the American Planning Association70 (2): 210-25.
41.
Talen, E.2001. Traditional urbanism meets residential affluence: An analysis of the variability of suburban preference. Journal of the American Planning Association67 (2): 199-216.
42.
Thompson, R.H.2004. Overcoming barriers to ecologically sensitive land management: Conservation subdivisions, green developments, and the development of a land ethic. Journal of Planning Education and Research24:141-53.
43.
Todd, D.A., P.B. Bedient, J.F. Haasbeck, and J. Noell.1989. Impact of land use and NPS loads on lake quality. Journal of Environmental Engineering115 (3): 633-49.
44.
Torng, G.2001. Urban form and drivers’ behavior: Transportation safety implications of residence in urban, suburban and rural environments. PhD diss., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
45.
Turner, M.G., R.H. Gardner, and R.V. O’Neill .2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process. New York: Springer-Verlag.
46.
Vogt, C.A., and R.W. Marans.2004. Natural resources and open space in the residential decision process: A study of recent movers to fringe counties in Southeast Michigan. Landscape and Urban Planning69:255-69.
47.
Youngentob, K., and M.E. Hostetler.2005. Is a new urban development model building greener communities? Environment and Behavior37 (6): 731-59.
