The need to internationalize planning education is increasingly apparent, but planning programs in the United States have varying capabilities and resources to incorporate an international dimension in their curriculum. Offering a multiuniversity studio and study abroad course in Mexico, in conjunction with the World Congress in 2006, provided an opportunity to collaboratively address this need. The synergies that accrued are worth considering. An argument is made for adopting similar studio efforts as an integral component of future World Planning Congresses.
Abramson, D.B.2005. The "studio" abroad as a model of transcultural engagement in urban planning education: A reflection of ten years of Sino-Canadian collaboration . Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (1): 89-102.
2.
Clark, G., and H. Dandekar.1991. Bringing the real world to the classroom . Planning, October, 16-17.
3.
Cleeland, N.1999. Many day laborers prefer their work to regular jobs. Los Angeles Times, June 19, Home edition, A1.
4.
Dandekar, H., C. Balsas, J. Fisher, J. Skay, and N. Labadie.2005. A plan for planning the west Phoenix revitalization area. http://design.asu.edu/hcdr/documents/WestPhoenixReportSept12Fin.pdf (accessed September 10, 2008).
5.
Dandekar, H., and G. Clark.1992. Integrating communication skills and planning techniques. Journal of Planning Education and Research11 (2): 141-50.
6.
Dandekar, H., F. Lara-Valencia, and Carlos Balsas.2006. A multiuniversity planning studio in Mexico City, summer of 2006: A successful experiment in the 2nd World Planning Congress. GPEIG Voice, November, p. 9. http://www.gpeig.org/archives/gpeig_newsletter(Fall06).pdf (accessed May 26, 2008).
7.
Dandekar, H., and F. Lara-Valencia .2009. At the Corazon: Five heartland cities in Mexico revitalize their historic city cores-both for tourists and residents. Planning, February.
8.
Friedman, T.L.2005. The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
9.
Goldstein, H., S. Bollens, E. Feser, and C. Silver.2006. An experiment in the internationalization of planning education: The NEURUS program. Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (4): 349-63.
10.
Hou, J., and I. Kinoshita.2007. Bridging community differences through informal processes, reexamining participatory planning in Seattle and Matsudo . Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26 (3): 301-14.
11.
Sanyal, B.1990. Breaking the boundaries: A one world approach to planning education. New York: Plenum.
12.
Stoll, D.1997. In focus: The immigration debate. U.S. Policy in Focus2 (31). http://www.theodorea.com/debate.html (accessed December 30, 2007).
13.
Storper, M., and R. Salais.1997. Worlds of production: The action frameworks of the economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Zuniga, V., and R. Hernandez-Leon. eds. 2005. New destinations: Mexican immigrants in the United States. New York: Russell Sage.
