This article analyses a fieldtrip studio course in Indonesia, reflecting on its value and benefits for urban planning. The original contribution of the article is twofold. First, we show how the course contributes to the development of the skills and knowledge required by planning graduates. Second, in relation to the course’s learning activities, we reflect on the significance and challenges involved in building partnerships between academia and industry from the perspective of the key partners involved in the course.
AllenAdrianaLambertRitaYapChristopher. 2017. “Co-learning the City. Towards a Pedagogy of Poly-Learning and Planning Praxis.” In The Routledge Companion to Planning in the Global South, edited by BhanGautanSrinivasSmitaWatsonVanessa, 355–67. London: Routledge.
2.
ArnsteinSherry. 1969, “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of American Institute of Planners35 (4): 216–24.
3.
BorjaJordiCastellsManuel. 1997. Local y global. La gestión de las ciudades en la era de la información [Local and global. The management of cities in the era of information]. Madrid: Taurus and UN-Habitat.
4.
CunninghamTonyGannonJulieKavanaghMary B.GreeneJohnReddyLouiseWhitsonLaurence. 2007. “Theories of Learning and Curriculum Design. Key Positionalities and Their Relationships.” Working Paper, Dublin Institute of Technology, Technology University of Dublin, Dublin. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=beschrecart.
5.
FeistauerDanielaRichterTobias. 2017. “How Reliable Are Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Quality? A Variance Components Approach.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education42 (8): 1263–79. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1261083.
6.
ForesterJohn. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
FrankAndrea I.SilverChristopher. 2018. “Conclusions.” In Urban Planning Education. Beginnings, Global Movement and Future Prospect, edited by FrankAndrea I.SilverChristopher, 337–45. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
8.
FriedmannJohn. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
FriedmannJohn. 1992. Empowerment. The Politics of Alternative Development. Cambridge: Blackwell.
10.
GeddesPatrick. 1915. Cities in Evolution: An Introduction to the Town Planning Movement and to the Study of Civics. London: Williams & Norgate.
11.
GoebelZane. 2021. “Reimagining Rapport.” In Reimagining Rapport, edited by GoebelZane, 1–18. New York: Oxford University Press.
HealeyPatsy. 2010. Making Better Places. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
HigginsMarilynAitken-RoseElizabethDixonJennifer. 2009. “The Pedagogy of the Planning Studio: A View from Down Under.” Journal for Education on the Built Environment4 (1): 8–30. doi:10.11120/jebe.2009.04010008.
15.
HolstonJames. 1998. Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16.
IfeJim. 2016. Community Development in an Uncertain World. Vision, Analysis & Practice. 2nd ed.Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
17.
InnesJudith E.BooherDavid E.1999. “Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems.” Journal of the American Planning Association65 (4): 412–23. doi:10.1080/01944369908976071.
18.
IswantoSita RahmaniRoitmanSonia. 2018. “Sukunan Village, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Environmental Sustainability through Community-Based Waste Management and Eco-Tourism.” In Global Planning Innovations for Urban Sustainability, edited by DarchenSebastienSearleGlenn, 90–105. Abingdon: Routledge.
19.
JonesPaul. 2019. “The Case for Inclusion of International Planning Studios in Contemporary Urban Planning Pedagogy.” Sustainability MDPI11:1–17.
20.
LongJudith Grant. 2012. “State of the Studio: Revisiting the Potential of Studio Pedagogy in U.S.-Based Planning Programs.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (4): 431–48.
21.
McLennanSaronStoreyDonovanLeslieHelen. 2014. “Entering the Field.” In Development Fieldwork. A Practical Guide, edited by ScheyvensRegina, 2nd ed., 143–59. London: SAGE.
22.
MinneryJohn. 2007. “Stars and Their Supporting Cast: State, Market and Community as Actors in Urban Governance.” Urban Policy and Research25 (3): 325–45.
23.
MiraftabFaranak. 2018. “Insurgent Practices and Decolonization of Future(s).” In The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, edited by GunderMichaelMadanipourAliWatsonVanessa, 276–88. New York: Routledge.
24.
OdendaalNancyWatsonVanessa. 2018. “Partnerships in Planning Education: The Association of African Planning Schools (AAPS).” In Urban Planning Education. Beginnings, Global Movement and Future Prospect, edited by FrankAndrea I.SilverChristopher, 147–60. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
25.
OzawaConnie P.SeltzerEthan P.1999. “Taking Our Bearings: Mapping a Relationship among Planning Practice, Theory and Education.” Journal of Planning Education and Research18:257–66.
26.
PatrickCarol-JoyPeachDeborahPockneeCatherineWebbFleurFletcherMartyPrettoGabriella. 2008. “The WIL [Work Integrated Learning] Report: A National Scoping Study.” Australian Learning and Teaching Council Final Report, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
27.
PieterseEdgar. 2008. City Futures. Confronting the Crisis of Urban Development. Cape Town: Zed Books.
28.
Planning Institute of Australia. 2019. Policy for the Accreditation of Australian Planning Qualifications. Kingston: Planning Institute of Australia.
29.
RobinsonJennifer. 2002. “Global and World Cities: A View from off the Map.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26 (3): 531–54.
30.
RoitmanSonia. 2019a. “Slum Dwellers Strategies and Tactics in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.” In The Routledge Handbook on Informal Urbanisation, edited by RoccoRobertovan BallegoijenJan, 281–92. Abingdon: Routledge.
31.
RoitmanSonia. 2019b. “Urban Poverty Alleviation Strategies in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Contrasting Opportunities for Community Development.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint60 (3): 386–401.
32.
SandercockLeonnie. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis. Chichester: John Wiley.
33.
SatterthwaiteDavidMitlinDiana. 2014. Reducing Urban Policy in the Global South. London: Routledge.
34.
SchönDonald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
35.
ThompsonSusanMaginnPaul. 2012. “What Is Planning?” In Planning Australia. An Overview of Urban and Regional Planning, edited by ThompsonSusanMaginnPaul, 2nd ed., 17–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
UN-Habitat. 2009. Planning Sustainable Cities. Global Report on Human Settlements 2009. London: Earthscan.
37.
United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. New York: United Nations.
38.
United Nations Development Programme. 2019. Beyond Income, beyond Averages, beyond Today: Inequalities in Human Development in the 21st Century. Human Development Report 2019. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
39.
WatsonElizabeth E.2004. “‘What a Dolt One Is’: Language Learning and Fieldwork in Geography.” Area36 (1): 59–68.
40.
WatsonVanessa. 2009. “Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues.” Urban Studies46 (11): 2259–75.
41.
WatsonVanessa. 2014. “Co-production and Collaboration in Planning: The Difference.” Planning Theory & Research15 (1): 62–76.
42.
WengerEtienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
WinklerTanja. 2013. “At the Coalface: Community-University Engagements and Planning Education.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (2): 215–27. doi:10.1177/0739456X12474312.
44.
The University of Queensland. 2018a. Partner Engagement Strategy 2018-2021. St Lucia: The University of Queensland.
45.
The University of Queensland. 2018b. Strategic Plan 2018-2021. St Lucia: The University of Queensland.
