This study analyzes consensus-building efforts in environmental review. It provides evidence of the effectiveness of consensus building by assessing changes in participants' perceptions before and after their involvement in a stakeholder advisory panel. In contrast to qualitative case study investigations of consensus building, this study uses quantitative analysis based on a quasi-experimental research design.
Arnstein, S.R.1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (4): 216—24.
2.
Bentrup, G.2001. Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study analysis of watershed planning in the intermountain west. Environmental Management27 (5): 739—48.
3.
Brody, S.D., D.R. Godschalk, and R.J. Burby.2003. Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association69 (3): 245—64.
4.
Burby, R.J.2003. Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association69 (1): 33—49.
5.
Carr, D.S., S.W. Selin, and M.A. Schuett.2004. Managing public forests: Understanding the role of collaborative planning. EnvironmentalManagement22 (5): 767—76.
6.
City of Lino Lakes, MN2005. I-35E corridor final alternative urban areawide review (AUAR). Lino Lakes, MN: Author.
7.
Conover, W.J.1980. Practical nonparametric statistics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
8.
Cook, T.D., and D.T. Campbell.1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
Daniels, S.E., and G.B. Walker.1996. Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review16 (2): 71—102.
10.
Dillman, D.A.2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method . New York: John Wiley and Sons .
11.
Forester, J.1998. Rationality, dialogue and learning: What community and environmental mediators can teach us about the practice of civil society . In Cities for citizens: Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age, edited by M. Douglass and J. Friedmann, 212—25. New York : John Wiley.
12.
———. 1999. The deliberative practitioner. Cambridge : Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press .
13.
Friedmann, J.1987. Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Gibbons, J.D.1993. Nonparametric statistics: An introduction. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series No. 90. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Helling, A.1998. Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution! Results from evaluating Atlanta's Vision 2020 project. Journal of the American Planning Association64 (3): 335—50.
16.
Innes, J.E.1992. Group processes and the social construction of growth management: Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey. Journal of the American Planning Association58 (4): 440—53.
17.
———. 1996. Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association62 (4): 461—72.
18.
Innes, J.E., and Booher, D.E.1999a. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association65 (4): 412—23.
19.
———. 1999b. Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research65 (1): 9—26.
20.
Innes, J.E., and J. Gruber.2005. Planning styles in conflict: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 177—88.
21.
Innes, J.E., J. Gruber, R. Thompson, and M. Neuman.1994. Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus building. Berkeley: California Policy Seminar, University of California.
22.
Jain, R.K., L.V. Urban, and G.S. Stacey.1993. Environmental assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Klosterman, R.E.1999. The what if? Collaborative planning support system . Environment and Planning B 26 (3): 292—408.
24.
Lauria, M., and J.A. Wagner.2006. What can we learn from empirical studies of planning theory? A comparative case analysis of extant literature. Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (4): 364—81.
25.
Lowry, K., P. Adler, and N. Milner.1997. Participating the public: Group process, politics, and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (2): 177—87.
26.
Mansfield, C., G. Van Houtven, and J. Huber.2001. The efficiency of political mechanisms for siting nuisance facilities: Are opponents more likely to participate than supporters. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics22 (2): 141—61.
27.
Margerum, R.D.1999. Integrated environmental management: The foundations for successful practice. EnvironmentalManagement24 (2): 151—66.
28.
_______. 2002a. Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (3): 237—53.
29.
_______. 2002b. Evaluating collaborative planning: Implications from an empirical analysis of growth management. Journal of the American Planning Association68 (2): 179—93.
_______. 2005. Recommended content and format alternative urban areawide review documents. St. Paul, MN: Author.
32.
O'Connor Center for the Rocky Mountain West.2000. Reclaiming NEPA's potential: Can collaborative process improve environmental decision-making? Missoula, MT: Author.
33.
Pisano, M.1995. Federal policy and community involvement. National Civic Review84 (1): 30—37.
34.
Propp, K.M.1997. Information utilization in small group decision making: A study of the evaluative interaction model. Small Group Research28 (3): 424—53.
35.
Reed, M.G.1999. Collaborative tourism planning as adaptive experiments in emergent tourism settings. Journal of Sustainable Tourism7 (3): 331—35.
36.
Spyke, N.P.1999. Public participation in environmental decision-making at the new millenium: Structuring new spheres of public influence. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review26 (2): 263—313.
37.
Stasser, G., D.D. Stewart, and G.M. Wittenbaum .1995. Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology31 (3): 244—65.
38.
Stasser, G., S.L. Vaughan, and D.D. Stewart.2000. Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes82 (1): 102—16.
39.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.2000. Decennial census. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
Webler, T., H. Kastenholz, and O. Renn.1995. Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review15 (5): 443—63.
41.
Wondolleck, J.M., and S.L. Yaffee.2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
