Teaching with the computer simulation game “SimCity” is one way faculty can achieve some of their decision-based learning objectives. The research on attainable (and not attainable) teaching outcomes with computer simulations is now fairly clear. SimCity provides a dynamic decision-making environment in which students can learn such teaching objectives as (1) systems thinking, (2) problem-solving skills, and (3) “craft” in the planning profession. However, SimCity has inherent weaknesses that prevent it from being a one-size-fits-all teaching tool for all students. The article concludes with a discussion on which type of students do better with SimCity.
Adams, Audrey.2004. Pedagogical underpinnings of computer-based learning. Journal of Advance Nursing46 (1): 5—12.
2.
Adams, Paul.1998. Teaching and learning with SimCity 2000. Journal of Geography97:47—55.
3.
Boud, David.1995. Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.
4.
Dewey, John.1938. Experience and Education. New York : Macmillan.
5.
Fishman, Robert.1982. Urban utopias in the twentieth century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, Le Corbusier. Boston, MA: MIT.
6.
Friedmann, John.1987. Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Garris, Rosemary, Robert Ahlers, and James Driskell.2002. Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming33 (4): 441—67.
8.
Gokhale, Anu.1996. Effectiveness of computer simulation for enhancing higher order thinking. Journal of IndustrialTeacher Education33 (4): 36—46.
9.
Hoch, Charles.1994. What planners do: Power, politics, and persuasion. Chicago: American Planning Association.
10.
Hung, David.2002. Situated cognition and problem-based learning: Implications for learning and instruction with technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research13 (Winter, i4): 393—415.
11.
Jacobs, Allan.1980. Making city planning work. Chicago : American Planning Association.
12.
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
13.
Kelly, Eric Damian, and Barbara Becker.2000. Community planning: An introduction to the comprehensive plan. Washington, DC: Island.
14.
Klabbers, Jan. 2006. The magic circle: Principles of gaming and simulations. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
15.
Kramer, Greg.2003. SimCity 4 deluxe edition: Prima's official strategy guide . Roseville, CA: Prima Games.
16.
Kolson, Kenneth.2001. Plans: The allure and folly of urban design. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lobo, Daniel.2005. A city is not a toy: How SimCity plays with urbanism. Presented at the Discussion Paper Series, Cities Program, Architecture and Engineering, Creative Commons. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Maxis.1989. SimCity: The city simulator. User documentation. Walnut Creek, CA.
21.
———. 2003. SimCity 4. Reference manual. San Mateo, CA: EA Games.
22.
McKinney, William.1997. The educational use of computer based science simulations: Some lessons from the philosophy of science. Science and Education6:591—603.
23.
Miller, Donald.1986. The Lewis Mumford reader. New York : Pantheon.
24.
Nantais, Kristin, and GlennSchellenberg. 1999. The Mozart effect: An artifact or preference. American Psychological Society10 (4): 370—73.
25.
Nathan, Mitchell, and Cecil Robinson.2001. Considerations of learning and learning research: Revisiting the “media effects” debate. Journal of Interactive Learning Research12 (1): 69—88.
26.
Pas, Eric.1995. The urban transportation planning process. In 2nd ed. of The geography of urban transportation, ed. Susan Hanson, 53—80. New York: Guilford.
27.
Plainsman, Auburn.2003. Professor uses SimCity in urban-planning class. Auburn University student newspaper June 12, A5.
28.
Rauscher, Frances, Gordon Shaw, and Katherine Ky .1993. Music and spatial task performance . Nature365:611.
29.
Rothfeder, Jeffrey.2004. Terror games. Popular Science (March): 83—91, 115.
30.
Schon, Donald.1973. Beyond the stable state. New York: Norton.
31.
Simon, Herbert.1985. The sciences of the artificial. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Starr, Paul.1994. Seductions of Sim: Policy as simulation game. The American Prospect5 (March): 17.
33.
Swaak, J., and T. de Jong.2001. Discovery simulations and the assessment of intuitive knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning17:284—94.
34.
Tompkins, Patricia.1998. Role playing/simulation. The Internet TESL JournalIV (8).
35.
Wilson, Johnny.1990. The SimCity planning commission handbook. Berkeley, CA: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Zacharia, Zacharias, and O. Roger Anderson .2003. The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students' conceptual understanding of physics. American Association of Physics Teachers71 (6): 618—29.
