Given the pace of land conservation in North America, the increasing complexity of land protection transactions, the charged social and political scenarios that often attend restriction of development rights, and the impacts of land conservation on local taxation, it is clear that municipal planners should be conversant about methods for and implications of voluntary land conservation planning and practice. To evaluate the nature of teaching on these issues, we conducted a survey of accredited planning degree programs. Results suggest that among accredited planning education degree programs, there is significant room for improvement in quality and quantity of teaching about voluntary land conservation. Recommendations include making some currently elective courses required and introducing more varied and participatory teaching methods in current and new courses that cover these topic areas.
Ahern, J., R. France, M. Hough, J. Burley, W. Turner, S. Schmidt, D. Hulse, J. Badenhope, and G. Jones.2002. Integrating ecology “across” the curriculum of landscape architecture. In Ecology and Design , edited by B. R. Johnson and K. Hill, 397-414. Washington, DC: Island Press.
2.
American Farmland Trust.2004. Cost of community services studies: Making the case for conservation. Washington, DC: American Farmland Trust.
3.
Berke, P.R.2000. Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning?Journal of Planning Literature17 (1): 21-35.
4.
Bourassa, S.C.1990. Land value taxation and housing development: Effects of property tax reform in three types of cities. American Journal of Economics and Sociology49:101-11.
5.
Caine, R.N., and G. Caine.1994. Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Lebanon, IN: Pearson Learning Group.
6.
Chicago Region Biodiversity Council.1999. Biodiversity recovery plan. Chicago Region Biodiversity Council. http://www.chicagowilderness.org/pubprod/brp/index.cfm (accessed July 15, 2004).
7.
Daniels, T.L.1991. The purchase of development rights: Preserving agricultural land and open space. Journal of the American Planning Association57:421-31.
8.
Daniels, T.L., and D. Bowers.1997. Holding our ground: Protecting America's farms and farmlands. Washington, DC: Island Press.
9.
Daniels, T.L., and K. Daniels.2004. The environmental planning handbook for sustainable communities and regions. 2nd ed. Chicago: American Planning Association .
10.
Daniels, T., and M. Lapping.2005. Land preservation: An essential ingredient in smart growth. Journal of Planning Literature19:316-29.
11.
Endicott, E.1993. Land conservation through public-private partnerships . Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
England, R.W.2002a. Current-use property assessment and land development: A review of development penalties. State Tax Notes2002, 793-6.
13.
———. 2002b. Land value taxation and local economic development: Results of a simulation study. State Tax Notes2002 , 323-7.
14.
England, R.W., and Mohr, R.D.2003. Property taxation and current use assessment: A theoretical note. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review April.
15.
Freyfogle, E.2003. The land we share: Private property and the common good . Washington, DC: Island Press.
16.
Jacobs, H.M.2000.The ambiguous role of private voluntary methods in public land use policy: A comment. Journal of the American Planning Association19:424-5.
17.
Jepson, E.J.2001. Sustainability and planning: Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of Planning Literature15 (4): 499-510.
18.
Land Trust Alliance.2004. National land trust census. Washington DC: Land Trust Alliance: http://www.lota.org/census/index.shtml (accessed June 15, 2005).
19.
Maryland Legacy Open Space.2005. Legacy open space: A partnership for open space conservation. Montgomery County, MD. http://www.mc-mncppc.org/legacy_open_space/index.shtm (accessed June 15, 2005).
20.
Ndubisi, F.2002. Ecological planning: A historical and comparative synthesis . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
Newburn, D., S. Reed, P. Berck, and A. Merenlender.2004. Economics and land-use change in prioritizing private land conservation. Conservation Biology19:1411-20.
22.
Nelson, A.C.2002. Comment on voluntary methods of land use control in planning . Journal of Planning Education and Research19:426.
23.
Oates, W.E., and R.M. Schwab.1997. The impact of urban land taxation: The Pittsburgh experience. National Tax Journal50:1-21.
24.
Peck, S.1998. Planning for biodiversity: Issues and examples. Washington, DC: Island Press.
25.
Pidot, J.2005. Reinventing conservation easements: A critical examination and ideas for reform. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Policy Focus Report PF013.
26.
Poole, K., S. Galatowitsch, R. Grese, D. Johnston, J.T. Keller, D. Richey, L.R. Skabelund, C. Steinitz, and J.Woodward. 2002. Building ecological understandings in design studio: A repertoire for a well-crafted learning experience. In Ecology and design, edited by B. R. Johnson and K. Hill, 415-72. Washington, DC : Island Press.
27.
Randolph, J.2004. Environmental land use planning and management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28.
Tamminga, K., L. Mozingo, D. Erickson, and J. Harrington.2002. Interweaving ecology and design in planning curricula. In Ecology and design, edited by B. R. Johnson and K. Hill , 357-96. Washington, DC: Island Press.
29.
Whittaker, M.1999. Preserving open space on the rural-urban fringe: The role of land trusts. In Contested countryside: The rural-urban fringe in North America, edited by M. Furseth and M. Lapping, 263-87. Aldershot , UK: Ashgate.
30.
Wright, J.B.1993. Conservation easements: An analysis of donated development rights. Journal of the American Planning Association59:487-93.
31.
Wright, J.B., and R.J. Czerniak.2000. The rising importance of voluntary methods of land use control in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research19:419-23.
